Understanding and modeling human-AI interaction of artificial intelligence tool in radiation oncology clinic using deep neural network: a feasibility study using three year prospective data.
Dongrong Yang, Cameron Murr, Xinyi Li, Sua Yoo, Rachel Blitzblau, Susan McDuff, Sarah Stephens, Q Jackie Wu, Qiuwen Wu, Yang Sheng
{"title":"Understanding and modeling human-AI interaction of artificial intelligence tool in radiation oncology clinic using deep neural network: a feasibility study using three year prospective data.","authors":"Dongrong Yang, Cameron Murr, Xinyi Li, Sua Yoo, Rachel Blitzblau, Susan McDuff, Sarah Stephens, Q Jackie Wu, Qiuwen Wu, Yang Sheng","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ad8e29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Artificial intelligence (AI) based treatment planning tools are being implemented in clinic. However, human interactions with such AI tools are rarely analyzed. This study aims to comprehend human planner's interaction with the AI planning tool and incorporate the analysis to improve the existing AI tool.<i>Approach.</i>An in-house AI tool for whole breast radiation therapy planning was deployed in our institution since 2019, among which 522 patients were included in this study. The AI tool automatically generates fluence maps of the tangential beams to create an<i>AI plan</i>. Human planner makes fluence edits deemed necessary and after attending physician approval for treatment, it is recorded as<i>final plan</i>. Manual modification value maps were collected, which is the difference between the<i>AI-plan</i>and the<i>final plan</i>. Subsequently, a human-AI interaction (HAI) model using full scale connected U-Net was trained to learn such interactions and perform plan enhancements. The trained HAI model automatically modifies the<i>AI plan</i>to generate AI-modified plans (<i>AI-m plan</i>), simulating human editing. Its performance was evaluated against original<i>AI-plan</i>and<i>final plan. Main results. AI-m plan</i>showed statistically significant improvement in hotspot control over the<i>AI plan</i>, with an average of 25.2cc volume reduction in breast V105% (<i>p</i>= 0.011) and 0.805% decrease in Dmax (<i>p</i>< .001). It also maintained the same planning target volume (PTV) coverage as the<i>final plan</i>, demonstrating the model has captured the clinic focus of improving PTV hot spots without degrading coverage.<i>Significance.</i>The proposed HAI model has demonstrated capability of further enhancing the<i>AI plan</i>via modeling human-AI tool interactions. This study shows analysis of human interaction with the AI planning tool is a significant step to improve the AI tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad8e29","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective.Artificial intelligence (AI) based treatment planning tools are being implemented in clinic. However, human interactions with such AI tools are rarely analyzed. This study aims to comprehend human planner's interaction with the AI planning tool and incorporate the analysis to improve the existing AI tool.Approach.An in-house AI tool for whole breast radiation therapy planning was deployed in our institution since 2019, among which 522 patients were included in this study. The AI tool automatically generates fluence maps of the tangential beams to create anAI plan. Human planner makes fluence edits deemed necessary and after attending physician approval for treatment, it is recorded asfinal plan. Manual modification value maps were collected, which is the difference between theAI-planand thefinal plan. Subsequently, a human-AI interaction (HAI) model using full scale connected U-Net was trained to learn such interactions and perform plan enhancements. The trained HAI model automatically modifies theAI planto generate AI-modified plans (AI-m plan), simulating human editing. Its performance was evaluated against originalAI-planandfinal plan. Main results. AI-m planshowed statistically significant improvement in hotspot control over theAI plan, with an average of 25.2cc volume reduction in breast V105% (p= 0.011) and 0.805% decrease in Dmax (p< .001). It also maintained the same planning target volume (PTV) coverage as thefinal plan, demonstrating the model has captured the clinic focus of improving PTV hot spots without degrading coverage.Significance.The proposed HAI model has demonstrated capability of further enhancing theAI planvia modeling human-AI tool interactions. This study shows analysis of human interaction with the AI planning tool is a significant step to improve the AI tool.
期刊介绍:
The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry