Disability, Pity, and the Workplace.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Jonathon S Breen, Viviana J Shiffman, Susan J Forwell
{"title":"Disability, Pity, and the Workplace.","authors":"Jonathon S Breen, Viviana J Shiffman, Susan J Forwell","doi":"10.1007/s10926-024-10247-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose is to examine perceptions of pity directed toward people with disabilities to gain a deeper understanding of the effect of these perceptions on the employment success of people with disabilities and to provide direction to disability-related training and strategic planning in the workplace.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two studies were developed to explore these relationships. The first measured the characteristics most frequently associated with people with disabilities in the workplace. Survey respondents rated the degree to which they believed the average person would assign these several characteristics to people with disabilities. The second measured the degree to which perceptions of pity, as directed toward people with disabilities, were correlated with the apparent complexity of those disabilities. Respondents determined the relative amount of money that passers-by would likely donate to panhandlers who used various mobility equipment (i.e., wheelchair, walker, cane).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from these studies indicated that people with disabilities were more likely to be assigned a preponderance of negative characteristics, including those described as unfortunate, limited, and tragic. In addition, people with disabilities whose disabilities were perceived as more complex were seen as being more in need of financial assistance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By providing an empirically driven starting point for organizational planners, including human resource professionals, managers, and recruiters, these two studies provide a basis upon which to develop strategies that account for these affect-based responses to disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-024-10247-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose is to examine perceptions of pity directed toward people with disabilities to gain a deeper understanding of the effect of these perceptions on the employment success of people with disabilities and to provide direction to disability-related training and strategic planning in the workplace.

Methods: Two studies were developed to explore these relationships. The first measured the characteristics most frequently associated with people with disabilities in the workplace. Survey respondents rated the degree to which they believed the average person would assign these several characteristics to people with disabilities. The second measured the degree to which perceptions of pity, as directed toward people with disabilities, were correlated with the apparent complexity of those disabilities. Respondents determined the relative amount of money that passers-by would likely donate to panhandlers who used various mobility equipment (i.e., wheelchair, walker, cane).

Results: Results from these studies indicated that people with disabilities were more likely to be assigned a preponderance of negative characteristics, including those described as unfortunate, limited, and tragic. In addition, people with disabilities whose disabilities were perceived as more complex were seen as being more in need of financial assistance.

Conclusion: By providing an empirically driven starting point for organizational planners, including human resource professionals, managers, and recruiters, these two studies provide a basis upon which to develop strategies that account for these affect-based responses to disability.

残疾、怜悯和工作场所。
目的:本研究旨在考察人们对残疾人的怜悯感,以深入了解这些怜悯感对残疾人成功就业的影响,并为工作场所中与残疾人相关的培训和战略规划提供指导:为探索这些关系,我们开展了两项研究。第一项研究测量了工作场所中最常见的与残疾人相关的特征。调查对象对他们认为普通人在多大程度上会将这几个特征归于残疾人进行评分。第二项调查衡量了人们对残疾人的怜悯感在多大程度上与这些残疾的明显复杂性相关。受访者确定了路人可能会捐给使用各种行动设备(如轮椅、助行器、拐杖)的乞丐的相对金额:这些研究结果表明,残疾人更有可能被赋予大量负面特征,包括那些被描述为不幸、受限和悲惨的特征。此外,被认为残疾情况更为复杂的残疾人更需要经济援助:这两项研究为组织规划者(包括人力资源专业人员、经理和招聘人员)提供了一个经验驱动的起点,为制定战略以考虑这些基于情感的残疾反应提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on the rehabilitation, reintegration, and prevention of disability in workers. The journal offers investigations involving original data collection and research synthesis (i.e., scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses). Papers derive from a broad array of fields including rehabilitation medicine, physical and occupational therapy, health psychology and psychiatry, orthopedics, oncology, occupational and insurance medicine, neurology, social work, ergonomics, biomedical engineering, health economics, rehabilitation engineering, business administration and management, and law.  A single interdisciplinary source for information on work disability rehabilitation, the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation helps to advance the scientific understanding, management, and prevention of work disability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信