Risk model for predicting failure to rescue after hepatectomy: Cohort study of 1371 consecutive patients.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jiro Kimura, Kosei Takagi, Yuzo Umeda, Tomokazu Fuji, Kazuya Yasui, Motohiko Yamada, Takeyoshi Nishiyama, Yasuo Nagai, Noriyuki Kanehira, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
{"title":"Risk model for predicting failure to rescue after hepatectomy: Cohort study of 1371 consecutive patients.","authors":"Jiro Kimura, Kosei Takagi, Yuzo Umeda, Tomokazu Fuji, Kazuya Yasui, Motohiko Yamada, Takeyoshi Nishiyama, Yasuo Nagai, Noriyuki Kanehira, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara","doi":"10.1111/hepr.14134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Although hepatectomy is a complex surgical procedure, its incidence among older patients has increased due to global aging. However, few studies have focused on the association between age and failure to rescue (FTR) posthepatectomy. This study aimed to investigate the association between age and FTR and develop a risk model for FTR following hepatectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed a total of 1371 consecutive patients who underwent primary hepatectomy between July 2003 and September 2022. The patients were divided into three groups according to their age: young-old (<65 years), pre-old (65-74 years), and old group (≥75 years). Additionally, the associations among age, FTR, and risk factors for FTR were investigated. Subsequently, a risk model was developed to predict the FTR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1371 patients, 373 (27.2%) experienced major complications, and FTR occurred in 15 patients. The older group showed a higher FTR rate (8.4%) than the young-old (1.3%) and pre-old (4.3%) groups (p = 0.03). Multivariate analyses indicated that older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.15; p = 0.045) and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status score ≥3 (OR 4.35; 95% CI 1.24-15.2; p = 0.02) were independent predictive factors for FTR. The risk model exhibited an accuracy with an area under the curve of 0.80 (95% CI 0.69-0.92). Calibration plots of the model revealed a concordance index of 0.73.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified an association between age, FTR, and risk factors for FTR posthepatectomy. Together, our risk model is a clinically relevant, internally validated, and useful tool for predicting FTR posthepatectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12987,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.14134","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Although hepatectomy is a complex surgical procedure, its incidence among older patients has increased due to global aging. However, few studies have focused on the association between age and failure to rescue (FTR) posthepatectomy. This study aimed to investigate the association between age and FTR and develop a risk model for FTR following hepatectomy.

Methods: We analyzed a total of 1371 consecutive patients who underwent primary hepatectomy between July 2003 and September 2022. The patients were divided into three groups according to their age: young-old (<65 years), pre-old (65-74 years), and old group (≥75 years). Additionally, the associations among age, FTR, and risk factors for FTR were investigated. Subsequently, a risk model was developed to predict the FTR.

Results: Of the 1371 patients, 373 (27.2%) experienced major complications, and FTR occurred in 15 patients. The older group showed a higher FTR rate (8.4%) than the young-old (1.3%) and pre-old (4.3%) groups (p = 0.03). Multivariate analyses indicated that older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.15; p = 0.045) and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status score ≥3 (OR 4.35; 95% CI 1.24-15.2; p = 0.02) were independent predictive factors for FTR. The risk model exhibited an accuracy with an area under the curve of 0.80 (95% CI 0.69-0.92). Calibration plots of the model revealed a concordance index of 0.73.

Conclusions: This study identified an association between age, FTR, and risk factors for FTR posthepatectomy. Together, our risk model is a clinically relevant, internally validated, and useful tool for predicting FTR posthepatectomy.

预测肝切除术后抢救失败的风险模型:1371 例连续患者的队列研究。
目的:虽然肝切除术是一种复杂的外科手术,但由于全球老龄化,老年患者的肝切除术发病率也在增加。然而,很少有研究关注年龄与肝切除术后抢救失败(FTR)之间的关系。本研究旨在探讨年龄与 FTR 之间的关系,并建立肝切除术后 FTR 的风险模型:我们分析了 2003 年 7 月至 2022 年 9 月间接受原发性肝切除术的 1371 例连续患者。根据年龄将患者分为三组:年轻组--老年组--青年组:在 1371 例患者中,373 例(27.2%)出现了主要并发症,15 例患者出现了 FTR。老年组的 FTR 发生率(8.4%)高于年轻组(1.3%)和未老年组(4.3%)(P = 0.03)。多变量分析表明,年龄较大(几率比 [OR] 1.07;95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.00-1.15;P = 0.045)和美国麻醉医师协会体能状态评分≥3(OR 4.35;95% CI 1.24-15.2;P = 0.02)是 FTR 的独立预测因素。该风险模型的准确度为曲线下面积 0.80 (95% CI 0.69-0.92)。该模型的校准图显示一致性指数为 0.73:这项研究发现了年龄、FTR 和肝切除术后 FTR 风险因素之间的关联。总之,我们的风险模型是一个与临床相关、经过内部验证的预测肝切除术后 FTR 的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hepatology Research
Hepatology Research 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
124
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Hepatology Research (formerly International Hepatology Communications) is the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology, and publishes original articles, reviews and short comunications dealing with hepatology. Reviews or mini-reviews are especially welcomed from those areas within hepatology undergoing rapid changes. Short communications should contain concise definitive information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信