{"title":"Evidence for a general cognitive structure in pigeons (Columba livia)","authors":"Mary Flaim, Aaron P. Blaisdell","doi":"10.1007/s10071-024-01912-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A well replicated result in humans is that performance, whether good or bad, is consistent across a wide variety of cognitive tasks. Factor analysis extracts one factor that can account for approximately half of the variance in performance. This factor is termed <i>g</i> and almost all cognitive tasks positively load onto this factor. While some neurobiological correlates of <i>g</i> have been identified in humans, causal experiments are only feasible in animals. When mice and some avian species are assessed with cognitive test batteries, performance positively correlates, and the first component extracted has similar properties to <i>g</i>. There are some limitations to the species tested thus far, including comparability in the cognitive domains assessed. The pigeon is an ideal subject to overcome these issues since pigeons, humans, and other primates are frequently given similar tasks and many neural correlates of performance have been identified in the pigeon. We created a test battery that assessed different domains, including associative learning, memory, cognitive flexibility, and reaction time. When all tasks were included, there was evidence for a two-component structure that was influenced by subjects’ age. When the reaction time task was excluded, there was a <i>g-like</i> component. The implications for these results when constructing future test batteries and comparing across species are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7879,"journal":{"name":"Animal Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10071-024-01912-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10071-024-01912-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A well replicated result in humans is that performance, whether good or bad, is consistent across a wide variety of cognitive tasks. Factor analysis extracts one factor that can account for approximately half of the variance in performance. This factor is termed g and almost all cognitive tasks positively load onto this factor. While some neurobiological correlates of g have been identified in humans, causal experiments are only feasible in animals. When mice and some avian species are assessed with cognitive test batteries, performance positively correlates, and the first component extracted has similar properties to g. There are some limitations to the species tested thus far, including comparability in the cognitive domains assessed. The pigeon is an ideal subject to overcome these issues since pigeons, humans, and other primates are frequently given similar tasks and many neural correlates of performance have been identified in the pigeon. We created a test battery that assessed different domains, including associative learning, memory, cognitive flexibility, and reaction time. When all tasks were included, there was evidence for a two-component structure that was influenced by subjects’ age. When the reaction time task was excluded, there was a g-like component. The implications for these results when constructing future test batteries and comparing across species are discussed.
一个在人类身上得到充分验证的结果是,在各种各样的认知任务中,无论成绩好坏,都是一致的。因子分析提取出的一个因子可以解释大约一半的成绩差异。这个因子被称为 g,几乎所有的认知任务都会对这个因子产生正负荷。虽然 g 的一些神经生物学相关因素已在人类身上找到,但因果实验只能在动物身上进行。在对小鼠和一些鸟类物种进行认知测试评估时,它们的表现呈正相关,提取的第一个成分与 g 具有相似的特性。鸽子是克服这些问题的理想对象,因为鸽子、人类和其他灵长类动物经常被赋予类似的任务,而且在鸽子身上已经发现了许多表现的神经相关性。我们设计了一套测试,评估不同的领域,包括联想学习、记忆、认知灵活性和反应时间。当所有任务都包括在内时,有证据表明存在受试者年龄影响的双成分结构。如果不包括反应时间任务,则存在类似 g 的成分。本文讨论了这些结果对今后构建测试库和进行跨物种比较的影响。
期刊介绍:
Animal Cognition is an interdisciplinary journal offering current research from many disciplines (ethology, behavioral ecology, animal behavior and learning, cognitive sciences, comparative psychology and evolutionary psychology) on all aspects of animal (and human) cognition in an evolutionary framework.
Animal Cognition publishes original empirical and theoretical work, reviews, methods papers, short communications and correspondence on the mechanisms and evolution of biologically rooted cognitive-intellectual structures.
The journal explores animal time perception and use; causality detection; innate reaction patterns and innate bases of learning; numerical competence and frequency expectancies; symbol use; communication; problem solving, animal thinking and use of tools, and the modularity of the mind.