Taylor Dowdy-Hazlett, Shamra Boel-Studt, Christopher Collins
{"title":"“We Do the Best We Can with What We Have”: Reflections from Residential Care Stakeholders on the Impacts of COVID-19","authors":"Taylor Dowdy-Hazlett, Shamra Boel-Studt, Christopher Collins","doi":"10.1007/s10560-024-00988-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>COVID-19 mandates required residential youth care providers to quickly adapt services while adhering to state and local mandates, impacting family visitation, stress, and potential disruption to reunification efforts. This mixed-methods study utilized data from a larger study of residential group homes in one southeastern state, utilizing the Quality Standards Assessment (QSA). First, utilizing open-ended responses on the QSA, a content analysis was used to explore residential care providers’ challenges and responses during COVID-19. Next, descriptive statistics and trend charts were utilized to explore quality differences in programs pre-, during, and post-COVID-19. The qualitative data reflected that COVID-19 presented significant challenges to residential care providers, including impacts on family and community engagement, programmatic procedures, education, and the residential care workforce. Responses to challenges included creating activities on-campus, conducting family visits virtually, shifting to on-campus schooling, and conducting re-licensing inspections virtually. The quantitative analysis showed mean quality rating trends dropping during the pandemic, with some quality ratings improving post-pandemic. Moreover, trends in mean incident reports increased during and post-pandemic years. Residential programs adapted to challenges, while some gaps remained. Issues with school and being isolated from family and community, as well as an increase in incident reports, were experienced among youth within residential care during COVID-19. Post-pandemic incident reports underscore the potential long-term impacts of COVID-19 on residential group care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51512,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-024-00988-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
COVID-19 mandates required residential youth care providers to quickly adapt services while adhering to state and local mandates, impacting family visitation, stress, and potential disruption to reunification efforts. This mixed-methods study utilized data from a larger study of residential group homes in one southeastern state, utilizing the Quality Standards Assessment (QSA). First, utilizing open-ended responses on the QSA, a content analysis was used to explore residential care providers’ challenges and responses during COVID-19. Next, descriptive statistics and trend charts were utilized to explore quality differences in programs pre-, during, and post-COVID-19. The qualitative data reflected that COVID-19 presented significant challenges to residential care providers, including impacts on family and community engagement, programmatic procedures, education, and the residential care workforce. Responses to challenges included creating activities on-campus, conducting family visits virtually, shifting to on-campus schooling, and conducting re-licensing inspections virtually. The quantitative analysis showed mean quality rating trends dropping during the pandemic, with some quality ratings improving post-pandemic. Moreover, trends in mean incident reports increased during and post-pandemic years. Residential programs adapted to challenges, while some gaps remained. Issues with school and being isolated from family and community, as well as an increase in incident reports, were experienced among youth within residential care during COVID-19. Post-pandemic incident reports underscore the potential long-term impacts of COVID-19 on residential group care.
期刊介绍:
The Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal (CASW) features original articles that focus on social work practice with children, adolescents, and their families. Topics include issues affecting a variety of specific populations in special settings. CASW welcomes a range of scholarly contributions focused on children and adolescents, including theoretical papers, narrative case studies, historical analyses, traditional reviews of the literature, descriptive studies, single-system research designs, correlational investigations, methodological works, pre-experimental, quasi-experimental and experimental evaluations, meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Manuscripts involving qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods are welcome to be submitted, as are papers grounded in one or more theoretical orientations, or those that are not based on any formal theory. CASW values different disciplines and interdisciplinary work that informs social work practice and policy. Authors from public health, nursing, psychology, sociology, and other disciplines are encouraged to submit manuscripts. All manuscripts should include specific implications for social work policy and practice with children and adolescents. Appropriate fields of practice include interpersonal practice, small groups, families, organizations, communities, policy practice, nationally-oriented work, and international studies. Authors considering publication in CASW should review the following editorial: Schelbe, L., & Thyer, B. A. (2019). Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Editorial Policy: Guidelines for Authors. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 36, 75-80.