Kota Kagawa, Koji Iida, Akira Hashizume, Go Seyama, Akitake Okamura, Rofat Askoro, Yasushi Orihashi, Tomoyuki Akita, Nobutaka Horie
{"title":"Risk factors for wound dehiscence after surgery for epilepsy.","authors":"Kota Kagawa, Koji Iida, Akira Hashizume, Go Seyama, Akitake Okamura, Rofat Askoro, Yasushi Orihashi, Tomoyuki Akita, Nobutaka Horie","doi":"10.3171/2024.7.JNS24961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Wound dehiscence following craniotomy is a complication for which patients are subjected to additional procedures to achieve wound closure. During surgery for epilepsy, a craniotomy is performed at various sites to cure or palliate seizures in patients with intractable epilepsy. Collaborations between medicine and engineering have provided many surgical devices and materials for various stages of craniotomy, from skin incision to wound closure. The risk factors for wound dehiscence remain undetermined. Here, the authors attempt to identify risk factors associated with wound dehiscence after surgery for epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>They retrospectively reviewed the clinical records and operative notes of consecutive patients with intractable epilepsy who had undergone craniotomy to allow resective or disconnective surgery between 2015 and 2023 in the Department of Neurosurgery, Hiroshima University Hospital, and had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The authors conducted a multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the risk factors for wound dehiscence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population comprised 174 patients who had undergone corpus callosotomy (70 patients), cortical resection (CR; 65 patients), or CR via intracranial video electroencephalography monitoring (IVEEG; 39 patients). Wound dehiscence occurred in 14 patients (8.0%). Univariate analysis showed that wound dehiscence was associated with CR via IVEEG (p = 0.0330), electrocautery scalpels (p = 0.0037), T-shaped skin incisions (p = 0.0216), dural closure (p = 0.0002), and longer operative duration (p = 0.0088). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that skin incision using an electrocautery scalpel (p = 0.0462, OR 9.38, 95% CI 1.04-84.74) and dural closure using nonabsorbable artificial dura (p = 0.0078, OR 6.29, 95% CI 1.63-24.31) were independent risk factors for wound dehiscence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical devices and materials contribute to wound dehiscence after epilepsy surgery. To avoid wound dehiscence, the use of an electrocautery scalpel is not recommended when performing skin incisions, nor is dural closure using a nonabsorbable artificial dura.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.7.JNS24961","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Wound dehiscence following craniotomy is a complication for which patients are subjected to additional procedures to achieve wound closure. During surgery for epilepsy, a craniotomy is performed at various sites to cure or palliate seizures in patients with intractable epilepsy. Collaborations between medicine and engineering have provided many surgical devices and materials for various stages of craniotomy, from skin incision to wound closure. The risk factors for wound dehiscence remain undetermined. Here, the authors attempt to identify risk factors associated with wound dehiscence after surgery for epilepsy.
Methods: They retrospectively reviewed the clinical records and operative notes of consecutive patients with intractable epilepsy who had undergone craniotomy to allow resective or disconnective surgery between 2015 and 2023 in the Department of Neurosurgery, Hiroshima University Hospital, and had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The authors conducted a multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the risk factors for wound dehiscence.
Results: The study population comprised 174 patients who had undergone corpus callosotomy (70 patients), cortical resection (CR; 65 patients), or CR via intracranial video electroencephalography monitoring (IVEEG; 39 patients). Wound dehiscence occurred in 14 patients (8.0%). Univariate analysis showed that wound dehiscence was associated with CR via IVEEG (p = 0.0330), electrocautery scalpels (p = 0.0037), T-shaped skin incisions (p = 0.0216), dural closure (p = 0.0002), and longer operative duration (p = 0.0088). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that skin incision using an electrocautery scalpel (p = 0.0462, OR 9.38, 95% CI 1.04-84.74) and dural closure using nonabsorbable artificial dura (p = 0.0078, OR 6.29, 95% CI 1.63-24.31) were independent risk factors for wound dehiscence.
Conclusions: Surgical devices and materials contribute to wound dehiscence after epilepsy surgery. To avoid wound dehiscence, the use of an electrocautery scalpel is not recommended when performing skin incisions, nor is dural closure using a nonabsorbable artificial dura.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.