Risk factors for wound dehiscence after surgery for epilepsy.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kota Kagawa, Koji Iida, Akira Hashizume, Go Seyama, Akitake Okamura, Rofat Askoro, Yasushi Orihashi, Tomoyuki Akita, Nobutaka Horie
{"title":"Risk factors for wound dehiscence after surgery for epilepsy.","authors":"Kota Kagawa, Koji Iida, Akira Hashizume, Go Seyama, Akitake Okamura, Rofat Askoro, Yasushi Orihashi, Tomoyuki Akita, Nobutaka Horie","doi":"10.3171/2024.7.JNS24961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Wound dehiscence following craniotomy is a complication for which patients are subjected to additional procedures to achieve wound closure. During surgery for epilepsy, a craniotomy is performed at various sites to cure or palliate seizures in patients with intractable epilepsy. Collaborations between medicine and engineering have provided many surgical devices and materials for various stages of craniotomy, from skin incision to wound closure. The risk factors for wound dehiscence remain undetermined. Here, the authors attempt to identify risk factors associated with wound dehiscence after surgery for epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>They retrospectively reviewed the clinical records and operative notes of consecutive patients with intractable epilepsy who had undergone craniotomy to allow resective or disconnective surgery between 2015 and 2023 in the Department of Neurosurgery, Hiroshima University Hospital, and had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The authors conducted a multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the risk factors for wound dehiscence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population comprised 174 patients who had undergone corpus callosotomy (70 patients), cortical resection (CR; 65 patients), or CR via intracranial video electroencephalography monitoring (IVEEG; 39 patients). Wound dehiscence occurred in 14 patients (8.0%). Univariate analysis showed that wound dehiscence was associated with CR via IVEEG (p = 0.0330), electrocautery scalpels (p = 0.0037), T-shaped skin incisions (p = 0.0216), dural closure (p = 0.0002), and longer operative duration (p = 0.0088). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that skin incision using an electrocautery scalpel (p = 0.0462, OR 9.38, 95% CI 1.04-84.74) and dural closure using nonabsorbable artificial dura (p = 0.0078, OR 6.29, 95% CI 1.63-24.31) were independent risk factors for wound dehiscence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical devices and materials contribute to wound dehiscence after epilepsy surgery. To avoid wound dehiscence, the use of an electrocautery scalpel is not recommended when performing skin incisions, nor is dural closure using a nonabsorbable artificial dura.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.7.JNS24961","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Wound dehiscence following craniotomy is a complication for which patients are subjected to additional procedures to achieve wound closure. During surgery for epilepsy, a craniotomy is performed at various sites to cure or palliate seizures in patients with intractable epilepsy. Collaborations between medicine and engineering have provided many surgical devices and materials for various stages of craniotomy, from skin incision to wound closure. The risk factors for wound dehiscence remain undetermined. Here, the authors attempt to identify risk factors associated with wound dehiscence after surgery for epilepsy.

Methods: They retrospectively reviewed the clinical records and operative notes of consecutive patients with intractable epilepsy who had undergone craniotomy to allow resective or disconnective surgery between 2015 and 2023 in the Department of Neurosurgery, Hiroshima University Hospital, and had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The authors conducted a multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the risk factors for wound dehiscence.

Results: The study population comprised 174 patients who had undergone corpus callosotomy (70 patients), cortical resection (CR; 65 patients), or CR via intracranial video electroencephalography monitoring (IVEEG; 39 patients). Wound dehiscence occurred in 14 patients (8.0%). Univariate analysis showed that wound dehiscence was associated with CR via IVEEG (p = 0.0330), electrocautery scalpels (p = 0.0037), T-shaped skin incisions (p = 0.0216), dural closure (p = 0.0002), and longer operative duration (p = 0.0088). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that skin incision using an electrocautery scalpel (p = 0.0462, OR 9.38, 95% CI 1.04-84.74) and dural closure using nonabsorbable artificial dura (p = 0.0078, OR 6.29, 95% CI 1.63-24.31) were independent risk factors for wound dehiscence.

Conclusions: Surgical devices and materials contribute to wound dehiscence after epilepsy surgery. To avoid wound dehiscence, the use of an electrocautery scalpel is not recommended when performing skin incisions, nor is dural closure using a nonabsorbable artificial dura.

癫痫手术后伤口开裂的风险因素。
目的:开颅手术后伤口开裂是一种并发症,患者需要接受额外的手术来实现伤口闭合。在癫痫手术过程中,会在不同部位进行开颅手术,以治愈或缓解难治性癫痫患者的癫痫发作。医学与工程学的合作为开颅手术的各个阶段(从皮肤切口到伤口闭合)提供了许多手术器械和材料。伤口开裂的风险因素仍未确定。在此,作者试图找出与癫痫手术后伤口开裂相关的风险因素:他们回顾性地查看了广岛大学医院神经外科在 2015 年至 2023 年间接受开颅手术切除或断开手术的连续顽固性癫痫患者的临床记录和手术记录,并进行了至少 1 年的随访。作者进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定伤口开裂的风险因素:研究对象包括174名患者,他们分别接受了胼胝体切开术(70名)、皮质切除术(65名)或通过颅内视频脑电图监测进行的皮质切除术(39名)。14名患者(8.0%)出现伤口裂开。单变量分析显示,伤口裂开与通过 IVEEG 进行 CR(p = 0.0330)、电烧手术刀(p = 0.0037)、T 形皮肤切口(p = 0.0216)、硬脑膜闭合(p = 0.0002)和手术时间较长(p = 0.0088)有关。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,使用电烧手术刀的皮肤切口(p = 0.0462,OR 9.38,95% CI 1.04-84.74)和使用不可吸收人工硬膜的硬膜闭合(p = 0.0078,OR 6.29,95% CI 1.63-24.31)是伤口开裂的独立风险因素:结论:手术器械和材料是导致癫痫手术后伤口开裂的原因之一。为避免伤口开裂,不建议在进行皮肤切口时使用电烧手术刀,也不建议使用不可吸收的人工硬脑膜进行硬脑膜闭合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信