Issues in the Adoption of Online Medical Care: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Survey.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yuka Sugawara, Yosuke Hirakawa, Masao Iwagami, Haruo Kuroki, Shuhei Mitani, Ataru Inagaki, Hiroki Ohashi, Mitsuru Kubota, Soichi Koike, Rie Wakimizu, Masaomi Nangaku
{"title":"Issues in the Adoption of Online Medical Care: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Survey.","authors":"Yuka Sugawara, Yosuke Hirakawa, Masao Iwagami, Haruo Kuroki, Shuhei Mitani, Ataru Inagaki, Hiroki Ohashi, Mitsuru Kubota, Soichi Koike, Rie Wakimizu, Masaomi Nangaku","doi":"10.2196/64159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telemedicine, or online medical care, has gained considerable attention worldwide. However, it has not been widely adopted in Japan, and the detailed status of received and provided online medical care and the reasons for its lack of popularity remain unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the current status of online medical care in Japan and the factors limiting its adoption from the perspective of both patients receiving and medical professionals providing online medical care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 2 nationwide questionnaire surveys were conducted. The first survey, targeting both patients and healthy individuals, screened approximately 40,000 participants among 13 million people. The participants were selected to match the age distribution of the Japanese population based on government data, and their online medical care experience and medical visit status were recorded. To further investigate online medical care use and satisfaction, a web-based survey was conducted with 15% (6000/40,000) of the screened participants. The second survey, targeting medical professionals, was administered to a physician, a nurse, and a member of the administrative staff in each of 4900 randomly selected medical facilities to inquire about their online medical care practices and impressions. In addition, both surveys investigated the factors limiting online medical care expansion in Japan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rates among patients and healthy individuals targeted for the screening and main surveys were 92.5% (36,998/40,000) and ˃80% (1312/1478, 88.77%; 1281/1522, 84.17%; 404/478, 84.5%; and 2226/2522, 88.26% in 4 survey groups), respectively. The survey of medical professionals yielded 1552 responses (n=618, 39.82% physicians; n=428, 27.58% nurses; n=506, 32.6% administrative staff). Although the facility-level response rate was low (794/4900, 16.2%), some facility categories had relatively high response rates. Only 5.29% (1956/36,998) of the patients and healthy individuals had online medical care experience. When there were more hospitals nearby and they felt it was more work to see a physician in person, they were more likely to use online medical care (more nearby hospitals: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.33, 95% CI 1.18-1.50; more work: aOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.35-1.63 per survey response point in the patient group). Similarly, these factors were substantially associated with satisfaction (more nearby hospitals: aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.14-1.73; more work: aOR 1.50, 95% CI 1.27-1.76 per survey response point in the patient group). In both surveys, the most frequently selected factor preventing the widespread use of online medical care was patients' need to switch to face-to-face medical care for mandatory tests and procedures. Inadequate awareness of and education on online medical care were also frequently selected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our nationwide surveys provided insights into the current status of online medical care in Japan and simultaneously identified several problems and issues related to it, which will be useful in promoting its wider adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"26 ","pages":"e64159"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568393/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/64159","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine, or online medical care, has gained considerable attention worldwide. However, it has not been widely adopted in Japan, and the detailed status of received and provided online medical care and the reasons for its lack of popularity remain unknown.

Objective: This study aims to investigate the current status of online medical care in Japan and the factors limiting its adoption from the perspective of both patients receiving and medical professionals providing online medical care.

Methods: In total, 2 nationwide questionnaire surveys were conducted. The first survey, targeting both patients and healthy individuals, screened approximately 40,000 participants among 13 million people. The participants were selected to match the age distribution of the Japanese population based on government data, and their online medical care experience and medical visit status were recorded. To further investigate online medical care use and satisfaction, a web-based survey was conducted with 15% (6000/40,000) of the screened participants. The second survey, targeting medical professionals, was administered to a physician, a nurse, and a member of the administrative staff in each of 4900 randomly selected medical facilities to inquire about their online medical care practices and impressions. In addition, both surveys investigated the factors limiting online medical care expansion in Japan.

Results: The response rates among patients and healthy individuals targeted for the screening and main surveys were 92.5% (36,998/40,000) and ˃80% (1312/1478, 88.77%; 1281/1522, 84.17%; 404/478, 84.5%; and 2226/2522, 88.26% in 4 survey groups), respectively. The survey of medical professionals yielded 1552 responses (n=618, 39.82% physicians; n=428, 27.58% nurses; n=506, 32.6% administrative staff). Although the facility-level response rate was low (794/4900, 16.2%), some facility categories had relatively high response rates. Only 5.29% (1956/36,998) of the patients and healthy individuals had online medical care experience. When there were more hospitals nearby and they felt it was more work to see a physician in person, they were more likely to use online medical care (more nearby hospitals: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.33, 95% CI 1.18-1.50; more work: aOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.35-1.63 per survey response point in the patient group). Similarly, these factors were substantially associated with satisfaction (more nearby hospitals: aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.14-1.73; more work: aOR 1.50, 95% CI 1.27-1.76 per survey response point in the patient group). In both surveys, the most frequently selected factor preventing the widespread use of online medical care was patients' need to switch to face-to-face medical care for mandatory tests and procedures. Inadequate awareness of and education on online medical care were also frequently selected.

Conclusions: Our nationwide surveys provided insights into the current status of online medical care in Japan and simultaneously identified several problems and issues related to it, which will be useful in promoting its wider adoption.

采用在线医疗的问题:跨部门问卷调查。
背景:远程医疗或在线医疗已在全球范围内受到广泛关注。然而,它在日本尚未被广泛采用,接受和提供在线医疗服务的详细情况及其不受欢迎的原因仍不得而知:本研究旨在从接受在线医疗服务的患者和提供在线医疗服务的医务人员的角度,调查日本在线医疗服务的现状以及限制其采用的因素:方法:总共进行了两次全国范围的问卷调查。第一项调查以患者和健康人为对象,从 1300 万人口中筛选出约 4 万名参与者。根据政府数据,按照日本人口的年龄分布选择参与者,并记录他们的在线医疗经验和就医状况。为了进一步调查在线医疗的使用情况和满意度,我们对筛选出的参与者中的 15%(6000/40000)进行了网络调查。第二项调查的对象是医疗专业人员,在随机抽取的 4900 家医疗机构中,每家医疗机构都有一名医生、一名护士和一名行政人员参与调查,以了解他们的在线医疗护理实践和印象。此外,这两项调查还调查了限制日本扩大在线医疗服务的因素:在筛选调查和主要调查中,患者和健康人的回复率分别为 92.5%(36998/40000)和 80%(4 个调查组分别为 1312/1478,88.77%;1281/1522,84.17%;404/478,84.5%;2226/2522,88.26%)。对医疗专业人员的调查共收到 1552 份回复(其中医生 618 份,占 39.82%;护士 428 份,占 27.58%;行政人员 506 份,占 32.6%)。虽然机构层面的回复率较低(794/4900,16.2%),但某些机构类别的回复率相对较高。只有 5.29%(1956/36998)的患者和健康人有过在线医疗护理经验。如果附近有更多的医院,并且他们认为亲自去看医生更费事,那么他们就更有可能使用在线医疗(附近有更多的医院:调整后的几率比 [aOR] 1.33,95% CI 1.18-1.50;更费事:患者组中每个调查回复点的几率比 1.48,95% CI 1.35-1.63)。同样,这些因素与满意度也有很大关系(附近医院较多:aOR 1.40,95% CI 1.14-1.73;工作较多:aOR 1.50,95% CI 1.27-1.76,患者组中每个调查回复点)。在这两项调查中,最常被选中的阻碍广泛使用在线医疗服务的因素是患者在进行强制性检查和程序时需要改用面对面的医疗服务。对在线医疗的认识和教育不足也是经常被选中的因素:我们在全国范围内开展的调查有助于了解日本在线医疗的现状,同时也发现了与之相关的一些问题,这些问题将有助于促进在线医疗的广泛应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
654
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades. As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor. Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信