Kyung Sook Hong, Jae Gil Lee, Tae Yoon Kim, Jae-Myeong Lee, Hoonsung Park, Hanyoung Lee, Na Rae Yang, Seung Min Baik
{"title":"Utility of arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide gradient as a severity index in critical care.","authors":"Kyung Sook Hong, Jae Gil Lee, Tae Yoon Kim, Jae-Myeong Lee, Hoonsung Park, Hanyoung Lee, Na Rae Yang, Seung Min Baik","doi":"10.1016/j.amjms.2024.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide gradient (P [a-Et] CO<sub>2</sub>) reveals the ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) status of critically ill patients. V/Q mismatch has several causes and affects the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients. We investigated the relationship between P (a-Et) CO<sub>2</sub> and the clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Critically ill patients (n = 1,978) on mechanical ventilation and capnography in the intensive care units of two institutions were enrolled and categorized into three groups: P (a-Et) CO<sub>2</sub> ≤10 mmHg (low group), 10 mmHg < P (a-Et) CO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 20 mmHg (medium group), and 20 mmHg < P (a-Et) CO<sub>2</sub> (high group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 29.5 ± 8.1, 31.3 ± 8.2, and 33.3 ± 8.7 in the low, medium, and high groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Overall mortality rates were 25.5 %, 35.6 %, and 52.8 % in the low, medium, and high groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The odds ratio was 1.456 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.117-1.897, p = 0.002) and 2.320 (95 % CI: 1.635-3.293, p < 0.001) for the medium and high groups, respectively, with the low group as a reference. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of P (a-Et) CO<sub>2</sub> for overall mortality was 0.604 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>P (a-Et) CO<sub>2</sub> is a simple, easily accessible indicator that potentially impacts patient care and outcomes as an independent marker for assessing disease severity and predicting mortality, especially in non-respiratory critical care scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":94223,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of the medical sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of the medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2024.10.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide gradient (P [a-Et] CO2) reveals the ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) status of critically ill patients. V/Q mismatch has several causes and affects the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients. We investigated the relationship between P (a-Et) CO2 and the clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.
Methods: Critically ill patients (n = 1,978) on mechanical ventilation and capnography in the intensive care units of two institutions were enrolled and categorized into three groups: P (a-Et) CO2 ≤10 mmHg (low group), 10 mmHg < P (a-Et) CO2 ≤ 20 mmHg (medium group), and 20 mmHg < P (a-Et) CO2 (high group).
Results: The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 29.5 ± 8.1, 31.3 ± 8.2, and 33.3 ± 8.7 in the low, medium, and high groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Overall mortality rates were 25.5 %, 35.6 %, and 52.8 % in the low, medium, and high groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The odds ratio was 1.456 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.117-1.897, p = 0.002) and 2.320 (95 % CI: 1.635-3.293, p < 0.001) for the medium and high groups, respectively, with the low group as a reference. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of P (a-Et) CO2 for overall mortality was 0.604 (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: P (a-Et) CO2 is a simple, easily accessible indicator that potentially impacts patient care and outcomes as an independent marker for assessing disease severity and predicting mortality, especially in non-respiratory critical care scenarios.