Geriatric education for pharmacy students: A scoping review.

Louise Papillon-Ferland, Lilia Ben Abdelkader, Noémie Maurice, Andréa Choinière, Yara Awwad, Razmig Aredjian, Jean-François Huon, Cheryl A Sadowski
{"title":"Geriatric education for pharmacy students: A scoping review.","authors":"Louise Papillon-Ferland, Lilia Ben Abdelkader, Noémie Maurice, Andréa Choinière, Yara Awwad, Razmig Aredjian, Jean-François Huon, Cheryl A Sadowski","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Comprehensive medication management for older adults requires specific knowledge and skills. Therefore, pharmacy curricula should include appropriate strategies to prepare students for care of this population. This scoping review aimed to identify how geriatric concepts, such as geriatric topics and competencies, are included in pharmacy curricula, and to map current literature on preferred teaching and assessment methods related to geriatric pharmacy education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases were searched to identify papers involving pharmacy learners, education, and geriatrics. Selection process was a two-step approach, involving independent title/abstract screening by two reviewers, then full-text retrieval for eligibility assessment. All types of articles were considered except opinion papers. Data extraction included details on methodology, participants, setting, educational activity, teaching method, and outcomes assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2537 articles were identified from which 189 met the inclusion criteria: 221 documents after citation and gray literature searching. Articles were grouped for analysis as education-related intervention articles (studies, n = 100 or descriptive articles/case reports, n = 49), studies not including an education-related intervention (n = 49), and others (e.g., reviews, position papers/statements, n = 23). Various teaching methods were reported including experiential, didactic, interprofessional, or simulation. Most articles reported positive outcomes on skills, knowledge, or attitudes, but few articles used a validated assessment tool. Curricula and student's surveys were consistent with suboptimal geriatric education, with few programs offering mandatory dedicated geriatric courses or rotations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gaps remain regarding geriatric inclusion in pharmacy curricula despite decades of evidence, advocacy, and frameworks to guide its development. A wide diversity of teaching methods has been described and their combination may be considered for skills and competency development. There is a need for the scholarship of teaching and learning to be applied to pharmacy programs in order to prepare future pharmacists for an aging society.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive medication management for older adults requires specific knowledge and skills. Therefore, pharmacy curricula should include appropriate strategies to prepare students for care of this population. This scoping review aimed to identify how geriatric concepts, such as geriatric topics and competencies, are included in pharmacy curricula, and to map current literature on preferred teaching and assessment methods related to geriatric pharmacy education.

Methods: Four databases were searched to identify papers involving pharmacy learners, education, and geriatrics. Selection process was a two-step approach, involving independent title/abstract screening by two reviewers, then full-text retrieval for eligibility assessment. All types of articles were considered except opinion papers. Data extraction included details on methodology, participants, setting, educational activity, teaching method, and outcomes assessed.

Results: A total of 2537 articles were identified from which 189 met the inclusion criteria: 221 documents after citation and gray literature searching. Articles were grouped for analysis as education-related intervention articles (studies, n = 100 or descriptive articles/case reports, n = 49), studies not including an education-related intervention (n = 49), and others (e.g., reviews, position papers/statements, n = 23). Various teaching methods were reported including experiential, didactic, interprofessional, or simulation. Most articles reported positive outcomes on skills, knowledge, or attitudes, but few articles used a validated assessment tool. Curricula and student's surveys were consistent with suboptimal geriatric education, with few programs offering mandatory dedicated geriatric courses or rotations.

Conclusions: Gaps remain regarding geriatric inclusion in pharmacy curricula despite decades of evidence, advocacy, and frameworks to guide its development. A wide diversity of teaching methods has been described and their combination may be considered for skills and competency development. There is a need for the scholarship of teaching and learning to be applied to pharmacy programs in order to prepare future pharmacists for an aging society.

药学专业学生的老年医学教育:范围审查。
背景:老年人的综合用药管理需要特殊的知识和技能。因此,药学课程应包括适当的策略,使学生为护理这一人群做好准备。本范围综述旨在确定如何将老年病学概念(如老年病学主题和能力)纳入药学课程,并绘制与老年病学药学教育相关的首选教学和评估方法的现有文献:搜索了四个数据库,以确定涉及药学学习者、教育和老年病学的论文。筛选过程分为两步,首先由两名审稿人对标题/摘要进行独立筛选,然后检索全文进行资格评估。除观点性论文外,所有类型的文章均在考虑之列。数据提取包括方法、参与者、环境、教育活动、教学方法和评估结果等方面的详细信息:共找到 2537 篇文章,其中 189 篇符合纳入标准:经过引文和灰色文献检索,共找到 221 篇文献。文章被分为与教育相关的干预文章(研究,n = 100 或描述性文章/案例报告,n = 49)、不包括教育相关干预的研究(n = 49)和其他(如综述、立场文件/声明,n = 23)进行分析。报道的教学方法多种多样,包括体验式教学、说教式教学、跨专业教学或模拟教学。大多数文章都报道了技能、知识或态度方面的积极成果,但很少有文章使用有效的评估工具。课程设置和学生调查显示,老年医学教育并不理想,很少有项目提供强制性的专门老年医学课程或轮转:结论:尽管已有数十年的证据、宣传和框架来指导老年医学的发展,但老年医学纳入药学课程的差距依然存在。教学方法多种多样,可以考虑将这些方法结合起来,以培养学生的技能和能力。有必要将教学学术研究应用于药剂学课程,以便为老龄化社会培养未来的药剂师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信