Dexamethasone regime and clinical outcomes in children hospitalized with croup: A cohort study.

David D'Arienzo, Muhammadhasan Nasser, Peter J Gill, Cornelia M Borkhoff, Patricia C Parkin, Sanjay Mahant
{"title":"Dexamethasone regime and clinical outcomes in children hospitalized with croup: A cohort study.","authors":"David D'Arienzo, Muhammadhasan Nasser, Peter J Gill, Cornelia M Borkhoff, Patricia C Parkin, Sanjay Mahant","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-quality trial evidence supports the use of one dose of dexamethasone in the outpatient management of croup; however, there are no inpatient trials, and the optimal treatment regimen for the inpatient management of croup remains uncertain. Significant practice variability exists in the corticosteroid treatment of children hospitalized for croup.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association of dexamethasone treatment regimen (1 vs. >1 dose) with hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30-day return to emergency department (ED) visits among children hospitalized for croup.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort study of children hospitalized for croup at a children's hospital between 2010 and 2022. Children less than 10 years old, without known airway anomalies and who received dexamethasone for croup treatment were included. Children who received 1 dose versus >1 dose of dexamethasone were compared. Propensity score analyses, using inverse probability of treatment weighting, were conducted to estimate the treatment effects of dexamethasone regimen on hospital LOS and all-cause 30-day return to ED visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 471 children hospitalized for croup, 229 (49%) received 1 dose of dexamethasone; 242 (51%) received >1 dose. In the propensity-weighted analyses, children receiving >1 dose of dexamethasone had a longer mean LOS by 59.6 h (95% CI 44.8-74.5, p < .001) compared with those receiving >1 dose. There was no statistically significant difference in the odds of all-cause 30-day return to ED visit; OR 1.30, (95% CI 0.76-2.22, p = .33).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among children hospitalized for croup, children who received >1 dose of dexamethasone had a longer LOS compared with children who received 1 dose of dexamethasone; however, there was no statistically significant difference in the 30-day return to ED visits. Randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the optimal dexamethasone treatment regimen for children hospitalized with croup.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High-quality trial evidence supports the use of one dose of dexamethasone in the outpatient management of croup; however, there are no inpatient trials, and the optimal treatment regimen for the inpatient management of croup remains uncertain. Significant practice variability exists in the corticosteroid treatment of children hospitalized for croup.

Objective: To evaluate the association of dexamethasone treatment regimen (1 vs. >1 dose) with hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30-day return to emergency department (ED) visits among children hospitalized for croup.

Methods: A cohort study of children hospitalized for croup at a children's hospital between 2010 and 2022. Children less than 10 years old, without known airway anomalies and who received dexamethasone for croup treatment were included. Children who received 1 dose versus >1 dose of dexamethasone were compared. Propensity score analyses, using inverse probability of treatment weighting, were conducted to estimate the treatment effects of dexamethasone regimen on hospital LOS and all-cause 30-day return to ED visit.

Results: Of 471 children hospitalized for croup, 229 (49%) received 1 dose of dexamethasone; 242 (51%) received >1 dose. In the propensity-weighted analyses, children receiving >1 dose of dexamethasone had a longer mean LOS by 59.6 h (95% CI 44.8-74.5, p < .001) compared with those receiving >1 dose. There was no statistically significant difference in the odds of all-cause 30-day return to ED visit; OR 1.30, (95% CI 0.76-2.22, p = .33).

Conclusions: Among children hospitalized for croup, children who received >1 dose of dexamethasone had a longer LOS compared with children who received 1 dose of dexamethasone; however, there was no statistically significant difference in the 30-day return to ED visits. Randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the optimal dexamethasone treatment regimen for children hospitalized with croup.

地塞米松疗法与因哮吼而住院的儿童的临床疗效:一项队列研究。
背景:高质量的试验证据支持在门诊治疗气团病时使用一剂地塞米松;但目前还没有住院试验,因此住院治疗气团病的最佳治疗方案仍不确定。在对因哮吼而住院的儿童进行皮质类固醇治疗时,存在着很大的实践差异:目的:评估地塞米松治疗方案(1 次与 1 次以上)与患儿住院时间(LOS)和 30 天急诊室复诊率(ED)的关系:方法:对 2010 年至 2022 年期间在一家儿童医院住院治疗的患儿进行队列研究。研究对象包括年龄小于 10 岁、无已知气道异常且接受地塞米松治疗的儿童。比较了使用 1 次地塞米松和使用 1 次以上地塞米松的儿童。采用反概率治疗加权法进行倾向评分分析,以估计地塞米松治疗方案对住院时间和全因30天急诊室复诊的治疗效果:结果:在471名因咳嗽住院的儿童中,229名(49%)接受了1次地塞米松治疗;242名(51%)接受了1次以上地塞米松治疗。在倾向加权分析中,接受 1 次以上地塞米松治疗的患儿平均住院时间延长了 59.6 小时(95% CI 44.8-74.5,P 1)。30天内因各种原因再次到急诊室就诊的几率无统计学差异;OR 1.30,(95% CI 0.76-2.22,p = .33):结论:在因气管痉挛住院的儿童中,与接受1次地塞米松治疗的儿童相比,接受1次以上地塞米松治疗的儿童的住院时间更长;但是,30天内再次去急诊室就诊的儿童与接受1次地塞米松治疗的儿童相比,在统计学上没有明显差异。需要进行随机临床试验,以确定对因哮吼而住院的儿童进行地塞米松治疗的最佳方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信