Effect of increased systemic oxygen delivery on postoperative outcomes and quality of life in elderly undergoing major abdominal surgery: A randomised controlled trial.

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY
Kishore Kumar Madhangopal, Ajay Kumar Jha, Sandeep Kumar Mishra, Suman Lata, Sri Ram Anant Nagabhushnam Padala
{"title":"Effect of increased systemic oxygen delivery on postoperative outcomes and quality of life in elderly undergoing major abdominal surgery: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Kishore Kumar Madhangopal, Ajay Kumar Jha, Sandeep Kumar Mishra, Suman Lata, Sri Ram Anant Nagabhushnam Padala","doi":"10.1177/17504589241287661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies comparing the intentional increase in oxygen delivery and normal oxygen delivery during general anaesthesia in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery are limited and have reported contradictory findings. Therefore, the study aimed to evaluate the effect of intraoperative increase in systemic oxygen delivery on postoperative outcomes and quality of life in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. This randomised, blinded, parallel-arm, pragmatic clinical trial included elderly patients of >60 years of age undergoing major abdominal surgery. The patients in the intervention arm received noradrenaline or increased fractional inspiration of oxygen to augment central venous oxygen saturation ⩾75%. The primary outcome measure was composite of in-hospital mortality and major organ complications. The secondary outcome measure included comparison of quality of life. A total of 160 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 146 were randomised in the study groups. The mean arterial and central venous oxygen saturation increased and were significantly higher in the intervention arm. The composite primary outcome occurred in 49.31% in the intervention arm and 57.53% in the usual care arm (relative risk; 95% confidence interval: 0.85; 0.63-1.16; absolute risk reduction; 8.22%; p = 0.32). Furthermore, quality of life at the end of three months was similar (0.658 ± 0.19 versus 0.647 ± 0.19; p = 0.771). In conclusion, central venous oxygen saturation-guided increase in systemic oxygen delivery during the intraoperative period of major abdominal surgery in elderly patients did not reduce predefined composite outcome of in-hospital mortality or organ-specific complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":35481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perioperative practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perioperative practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589241287661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies comparing the intentional increase in oxygen delivery and normal oxygen delivery during general anaesthesia in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery are limited and have reported contradictory findings. Therefore, the study aimed to evaluate the effect of intraoperative increase in systemic oxygen delivery on postoperative outcomes and quality of life in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. This randomised, blinded, parallel-arm, pragmatic clinical trial included elderly patients of >60 years of age undergoing major abdominal surgery. The patients in the intervention arm received noradrenaline or increased fractional inspiration of oxygen to augment central venous oxygen saturation ⩾75%. The primary outcome measure was composite of in-hospital mortality and major organ complications. The secondary outcome measure included comparison of quality of life. A total of 160 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 146 were randomised in the study groups. The mean arterial and central venous oxygen saturation increased and were significantly higher in the intervention arm. The composite primary outcome occurred in 49.31% in the intervention arm and 57.53% in the usual care arm (relative risk; 95% confidence interval: 0.85; 0.63-1.16; absolute risk reduction; 8.22%; p = 0.32). Furthermore, quality of life at the end of three months was similar (0.658 ± 0.19 versus 0.647 ± 0.19; p = 0.771). In conclusion, central venous oxygen saturation-guided increase in systemic oxygen delivery during the intraoperative period of major abdominal surgery in elderly patients did not reduce predefined composite outcome of in-hospital mortality or organ-specific complications.

增加全身供氧量对接受大型腹部手术的老年人术后效果和生活质量的影响:随机对照试验
对接受大型腹部手术的老年患者在全身麻醉期间有意增加供氧量和正常供氧量进行比较的研究非常有限,且报告的结果相互矛盾。因此,本研究旨在评估术中增加全身供氧量对接受腹部大手术的老年患者术后效果和生活质量的影响。这项随机、盲法、平行臂、实用性临床试验纳入了接受大型腹部手术的 60 岁以上老年患者。干预组患者接受去甲肾上腺素或增加吸氧分数,以提高中心静脉血氧饱和度⩾75%。主要结果指标是院内死亡率和主要器官并发症的复合指标。次要结果包括生活质量的比较。共有 160 名患者接受了资格评估,其中 146 人被随机分入研究组。干预组的平均动脉血氧饱和度和中心静脉血氧饱和度均有所上升,且明显高于干预组。干预组和常规护理组分别有 49.31% 和 57.53% 的患者出现综合主要结果(相对风险;95% 置信区间:0.85;0.63-1.16;绝对风险降低;8.22%;P = 0.32)。此外,三个月后的生活质量也相似(0.658 ± 0.19 对 0.647 ± 0.19;P = 0.771)。总之,在老年腹部大手术的术中阶段,通过中心静脉血氧饱和度引导增加全身供氧量并不能降低院内死亡率或器官特异性并发症的预定复合结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of perioperative practice
Journal of perioperative practice Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perioperative Practice (JPP) is the official journal of the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). It is an international, peer reviewed journal with a multidisciplinary ethos across all aspects of perioperative care. The overall aim of the journal is to improve patient safety through informing and developing practice. It is an informative professional journal which provides current evidence-based practice, clinical, management and educational developments for practitioners working in the perioperative environment. The journal promotes perioperative practice by publishing clinical research-based articles, literature reviews, topical discussions, advice on clinical issues, current news items and product information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信