Misinformation About Climate Change and Related Environmental Events on Social Media: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Maryline Vivion, Valérie Trottier, Ève Bouhêlier, Isabelle Goupil-Sormany, Thierno Diallo
{"title":"Misinformation About Climate Change and Related Environmental Events on Social Media: Protocol for a Scoping Review.","authors":"Maryline Vivion, Valérie Trottier, Ève Bouhêlier, Isabelle Goupil-Sormany, Thierno Diallo","doi":"10.2196/59345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Climate change and related environmental events represent major global challenges and are often accompanied by the spread of misinformation on social media. According to previous reviews, the dissemination of this misinformation on various social media platforms requires deeper exploration. Moreover, the findings reported applied mainly to the context of the United States, limiting the possibility of extending the results to other settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the current state of knowledge about misinformation concerning climate change and related environmental events that are circulating on social media. More specifically, we will explore past and current themes, actors, and sources, and the dissemination of this misinformation within the Canadian context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review protocol follows the methodological approach developed by Arksey and O'Malley and advanced by Levac, complemented by the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and the best practice guidance for the development of scoping review protocols. Following the identification of the research questions and assisted by a specialized librarian, we developed search strategies for selected bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and GreenFILE) and for gray literature (Google and pertinent databases) searches. Bibliographic and gray literature will be searched to identify relevant publications. In total, 2 members of our team will use the review software Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation) to independently select publications to include in the review. Publications specifically addressing our research questions, peer-reviewed, evidence-based, and published from January 1, 2000, in the full-text version in English or French will be included. Data will be extracted from the included publications to chart, among other items, the years of publication, geographic areas, themes, actors, and sources of the climate change-related misinformation and conclusions reported. Our team will then synthesize the extracted data to articulate the current state of knowledge relating to our research inquiries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The research questions were identified in January 2024. The search strategies were developed from January to March 2024 for MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science and in July 2024 for GreenFILE and gray literature. MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science searches were launched on March 26, 2024. The first of 2 rounds of selection of publications identified through these databases was achieved in April 2024.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This protocol will enable us to identify the evolution of themes, actors, and sources of misinformation regarding climate change and related environmental events on social media, including the latest platforms, and to potentially identify a context particular to Canada. As misinformation is known to undermine actions and public support in the fight against climate change, we intend to facilitate the targeting of efforts to combat misinformation related to climate change in an up-to-date and contextualized manner.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>DERR1-10.2196/59345.</p>","PeriodicalId":14755,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Research Protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Research Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/59345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Climate change and related environmental events represent major global challenges and are often accompanied by the spread of misinformation on social media. According to previous reviews, the dissemination of this misinformation on various social media platforms requires deeper exploration. Moreover, the findings reported applied mainly to the context of the United States, limiting the possibility of extending the results to other settings.

Objective: This study aims to assess the current state of knowledge about misinformation concerning climate change and related environmental events that are circulating on social media. More specifically, we will explore past and current themes, actors, and sources, and the dissemination of this misinformation within the Canadian context.

Methods: This scoping review protocol follows the methodological approach developed by Arksey and O'Malley and advanced by Levac, complemented by the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and the best practice guidance for the development of scoping review protocols. Following the identification of the research questions and assisted by a specialized librarian, we developed search strategies for selected bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and GreenFILE) and for gray literature (Google and pertinent databases) searches. Bibliographic and gray literature will be searched to identify relevant publications. In total, 2 members of our team will use the review software Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation) to independently select publications to include in the review. Publications specifically addressing our research questions, peer-reviewed, evidence-based, and published from January 1, 2000, in the full-text version in English or French will be included. Data will be extracted from the included publications to chart, among other items, the years of publication, geographic areas, themes, actors, and sources of the climate change-related misinformation and conclusions reported. Our team will then synthesize the extracted data to articulate the current state of knowledge relating to our research inquiries.

Results: The research questions were identified in January 2024. The search strategies were developed from January to March 2024 for MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science and in July 2024 for GreenFILE and gray literature. MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science searches were launched on March 26, 2024. The first of 2 rounds of selection of publications identified through these databases was achieved in April 2024.

Conclusions: This protocol will enable us to identify the evolution of themes, actors, and sources of misinformation regarding climate change and related environmental events on social media, including the latest platforms, and to potentially identify a context particular to Canada. As misinformation is known to undermine actions and public support in the fight against climate change, we intend to facilitate the targeting of efforts to combat misinformation related to climate change in an up-to-date and contextualized manner.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/59345.

社交媒体上关于气候变化和相关环境事件的错误信息:范围界定审查议定书》。
背景:气候变化和相关环境事件是全球性的重大挑战,往往伴随着错误信息在社交媒体上的传播。根据以往的评论,需要对这些错误信息在各种社交媒体平台上的传播进行更深入的探讨。此外,报告的研究结果主要适用于美国的情况,限制了将结果推广到其他环境的可能性:本研究旨在评估社交媒体上流传的有关气候变化和相关环境事件的错误信息的知识现状。更具体地说,我们将探讨过去和当前的主题、参与者和来源,以及这些错误信息在加拿大范围内的传播情况:本范围界定综述协议遵循 Arksey 和 O'Malley 开发的、由 Levac 推进的方法论方法,并辅以 PRISMA-ScR(范围界定综述的系统综述和 Meta 分析扩展首选报告项目)核对表和范围界定综述协议开发最佳实践指南。确定研究问题后,在专业图书管理员的协助下,我们为选定的书目数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science 和 GreenFILE)和灰色文献(Google 和相关数据库)制定了检索策略。我们将对书目文献和灰色文献进行检索,以确定相关出版物。我们团队的两名成员将使用审稿软件 Covidence(Veritas Health Innovation)独立选择要纳入审稿的出版物。我们将收录专门针对我们的研究问题、经过同行评审、以证据为基础、自 2000 年 1 月 1 日起出版的英文或法文全文出版物。我们将从收录的出版物中提取数据,除其他项目外,绘制出与气候变化相关的错误信息和结论的出版年份、地理区域、主题、参与者和来源图表。然后,我们的团队将对提取的数据进行综合,以阐明与我们的研究调查相关的知识现状:研究问题于 2024 年 1 月确定。2024 年 1 月至 3 月制定了 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Web of Science 的检索策略,2024 年 7 月制定了 GreenFILE 和灰色文献的检索策略。MEDLINE、Embase 和 Web of Science 的检索于 2024 年 3 月 26 日启动。2024 年 4 月,对通过这些数据库确定的出版物进行了两轮筛选,并完成了第一轮筛选:该协议将使我们能够确定社交媒体(包括最新平台)上有关气候变化和相关环境事件的错误信息的主题、参与者和来源的演变,并有可能确定加拿大的特殊背景。众所周知,错误信息会破坏应对气候变化的行动和公众支持,因此,我们希望以最新的方式,根据具体情况,有针对性地打击与气候变化有关的错误信息:DERR1-10.2196/59345。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
414
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信