A new instrument for the screening of psoriatic arthritis among psoriatic patients.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Gabriele De Marco, Antonio Marchesoni, Maria Manara, Paolo Gisondi, Luca Idolazzi, Roberta Ramonda, Stefano Piaserico, Alberto Cauli, Marco Amedeo Cimmino, Veronica Tomatis, Carlo Salvarani, Rossana Scrivo, Anna Zanetti, Greta Carrara, Carlo Alberto Scirè, Angelo Cattaneo
{"title":"A new instrument for the screening of psoriatic arthritis among psoriatic patients.","authors":"Gabriele De Marco, Antonio Marchesoni, Maria Manara, Paolo Gisondi, Luca Idolazzi, Roberta Ramonda, Stefano Piaserico, Alberto Cauli, Marco Amedeo Cimmino, Veronica Tomatis, Carlo Salvarani, Rossana Scrivo, Anna Zanetti, Greta Carrara, Carlo Alberto Scirè, Angelo Cattaneo","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/ug6vti","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a dermatologist-filled-in 7-item questionnaire (called HERACLES) as a screening tool for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with psoriasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was performed in Italy in seven dermatology centres cooperating with rheumatology centres. Adults with psoriasis were consecutively recruited up to a calculated number of 750. They were invited to fill in the following questionnaires used for PsA screening: ToPAS, PASE, PEST, and EARP. The dermatologists, in addition to standard demographic and clinical data, scored each participant using a new 7-item questionnaire. All participants were later evaluated by the rheumatologists for a diagnosis of PsA. The performance of the various questionnaires was compared using receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) area-under-the-curve (AUC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 759 enrolled psoriatic patients, 524 (280 males and 244 females) were suitable for data analysis. PsA was diagnosed in 73 (13.9%) participants. PsA and non-PsA patient characteristics were comparable, except for arthritis-related features which were often more prevalent in the PsA group. The ROC AUC of the HERACLES instrument was 0.775 (CI: 0.722-0.828), similar to that of the other questionnaires (ToPAS 0.757; PASE 0.730; PEST 0.741; and EARP 0.739). For the HERACLES instrument, a score value of 2 yielded a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 47%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, a dermatologist-filled-in questionnaire proved to be not inferior to patient-administered PsA screening tools and to be feasible. It might be an alternative (or additional) tool to screen psoriatic patients for rheumatology referral.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/ug6vti","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a dermatologist-filled-in 7-item questionnaire (called HERACLES) as a screening tool for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with psoriasis.

Methods: This study was performed in Italy in seven dermatology centres cooperating with rheumatology centres. Adults with psoriasis were consecutively recruited up to a calculated number of 750. They were invited to fill in the following questionnaires used for PsA screening: ToPAS, PASE, PEST, and EARP. The dermatologists, in addition to standard demographic and clinical data, scored each participant using a new 7-item questionnaire. All participants were later evaluated by the rheumatologists for a diagnosis of PsA. The performance of the various questionnaires was compared using receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) area-under-the-curve (AUC) analysis.

Results: Of the 759 enrolled psoriatic patients, 524 (280 males and 244 females) were suitable for data analysis. PsA was diagnosed in 73 (13.9%) participants. PsA and non-PsA patient characteristics were comparable, except for arthritis-related features which were often more prevalent in the PsA group. The ROC AUC of the HERACLES instrument was 0.775 (CI: 0.722-0.828), similar to that of the other questionnaires (ToPAS 0.757; PASE 0.730; PEST 0.741; and EARP 0.739). For the HERACLES instrument, a score value of 2 yielded a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 47%.

Conclusions: In this study, a dermatologist-filled-in questionnaire proved to be not inferior to patient-administered PsA screening tools and to be feasible. It might be an alternative (or additional) tool to screen psoriatic patients for rheumatology referral.

用于筛查银屑病患者银屑病关节炎的新工具。
研究目的本研究旨在评估由皮肤科医生填写的 7 项调查问卷(称为 HERACLES)作为银屑病患者银屑病关节炎(PsA)筛查工具的性能:这项研究是在意大利与风湿病中心合作的七个皮肤病中心进行的。连续招募了750名成人银屑病患者。他们被邀请填写以下用于 PsA 筛查的问卷:ToPAS、PASE、PEST 和 EARP。除了标准的人口统计学和临床数据外,皮肤科医生还使用新的 7 项问卷对每位参与者进行评分。随后,风湿病专家对所有参与者进行了评估,以确诊他们是否患有 PsA。使用受体运算特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)分析比较了各种问卷的性能:在 759 名登记的银屑病患者中,有 524 人(280 名男性和 244 名女性)适合进行数据分析。73人(13.9%)确诊为PsA。PsA和非PsA患者的特征具有可比性,但与关节炎相关的特征在PsA组中通常更为普遍。HERACLES 工具的 ROC AUC 为 0.775(CI:0.722-0.828),与其他问卷(ToPAS 0.757;PASE 0.730;PEST 0.741;EARP 0.739)相似。对于 HERACLES 工具,2 分的灵敏度为 92%,特异性为 47%:在这项研究中,由皮肤科医生填写的问卷被证明并不比患者自制的 PsA 筛查工具差,而且是可行的。它可以作为筛查银屑病患者的替代(或附加)工具,以便风湿免疫科进行转诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.90%
发文量
377
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信