The impact of urban-rural residents’ life quality gap on the cultivated land transfer

IF 6 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Weiwen Wang , Yang Shen , Jiajun Qiao , Ying Wang , Lochan Kumar Batala , Jie Xiao
{"title":"The impact of urban-rural residents’ life quality gap on the cultivated land transfer","authors":"Weiwen Wang ,&nbsp;Yang Shen ,&nbsp;Jiajun Qiao ,&nbsp;Ying Wang ,&nbsp;Lochan Kumar Batala ,&nbsp;Jie Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cultivated land transfer serves as an efficient way to mitigate the escalating issue of cultivated land abandonment due to labor migration driven by the urban-rural gap, while also ensuring national food security. Nevertheless, the impact of how urban-rural resident’ life quality gap (RLQG) affect cultivated land transfer decision-making remains unclear. This study developed a theoretical framework that links urban-rural RLQG and cultivated land transfer and empirically investigated the causal relationships between these variables using a nationally representative dataset from China and employing the Random Forest method. Additionally, the heterogeneity of the impact across different geomorphic regions was also explored. The results indicate that disparities in economic conditions (e.g., cash deposits, durable goods, consumer expenditure, etc.) between urban and rural areas significantly impact cultivated land transfer decision-making, particularly in plain regions. To promote cultivated land transfer, the hilly regions should prioritize the reduction of the employment service gap, while the disparity in education and health levels in the mountain regions plays a leading role. Furthermore, the cultivated land transfer can be facilitated when the urban-rural residents’ life quality equalizes or RLQG widens sufficiently. Therefore, this study emphasizes the importance of considering the regional socio-economic environment difference caused by geomorphic variations when formulating policies aimed at narrowing the urban-rural RLQG and promoting cultivated land transfer. Furthermore, policy-makers may redirect focus towards alternative indicators for balancing urban-rural RLQG and cultivated land transfers in cases where a particular indicator proves ineffective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 107402"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837724003557","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cultivated land transfer serves as an efficient way to mitigate the escalating issue of cultivated land abandonment due to labor migration driven by the urban-rural gap, while also ensuring national food security. Nevertheless, the impact of how urban-rural resident’ life quality gap (RLQG) affect cultivated land transfer decision-making remains unclear. This study developed a theoretical framework that links urban-rural RLQG and cultivated land transfer and empirically investigated the causal relationships between these variables using a nationally representative dataset from China and employing the Random Forest method. Additionally, the heterogeneity of the impact across different geomorphic regions was also explored. The results indicate that disparities in economic conditions (e.g., cash deposits, durable goods, consumer expenditure, etc.) between urban and rural areas significantly impact cultivated land transfer decision-making, particularly in plain regions. To promote cultivated land transfer, the hilly regions should prioritize the reduction of the employment service gap, while the disparity in education and health levels in the mountain regions plays a leading role. Furthermore, the cultivated land transfer can be facilitated when the urban-rural residents’ life quality equalizes or RLQG widens sufficiently. Therefore, this study emphasizes the importance of considering the regional socio-economic environment difference caused by geomorphic variations when formulating policies aimed at narrowing the urban-rural RLQG and promoting cultivated land transfer. Furthermore, policy-makers may redirect focus towards alternative indicators for balancing urban-rural RLQG and cultivated land transfers in cases where a particular indicator proves ineffective.
城乡居民生活质量差距对耕地流转的影响
耕地流转是缓解因城乡差距导致劳动力迁移而造成的耕地撂荒问题的有效途径,同时也能确保国家粮食安全。然而,城乡居民生活质量差距(RLQG)对耕地流转决策的影响仍不明确。本研究建立了一个将城乡居民生活质量差距与耕地流转联系起来的理论框架,并利用具有全国代表性的中国数据集,采用随机森林法对这些变量之间的因果关系进行了实证研究。此外,还探讨了不同地貌区域之间影响的异质性。结果表明,城乡经济条件(如现金存款、耐用品、消费支出等)的差异对耕地流转决策产生了显著影响,尤其是在平原地区。为促进耕地流转,丘陵地区应优先缩小就业服务差距,而山区的教育和卫生水平差距则起着主导作用。此外,当城乡居民生活质量趋于均等或 RLQG 充分扩大时,也可促进耕地流转。因此,本研究强调,在制定旨在缩小城乡 RLQG 并促进耕地流转的政策时,必须考虑地貌变化导致的区域社会经济环境差异。此外,在某一指标证明无效的情况下,政策制定者可将重点转向其他指标,以平衡城乡 RLQG 和耕地流转。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信