Decoding algorithm fatigue: The role of algorithmic literacy, information cocoons, and algorithmic opacity

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Hui Yang, Dan Li, Peng Hu
{"title":"Decoding algorithm fatigue: The role of algorithmic literacy, information cocoons, and algorithmic opacity","authors":"Hui Yang,&nbsp;Dan Li,&nbsp;Peng Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Algorithmic technologies are dominating our online experiences, from content recommendations to personalized services. However, it also introduces a new challenge: algorithm fatigue. Algorithm fatigue describes the phenomenon where users experience mental and emotional exhaustion in prolonged interaction with algorithms. To decode this phenomenon, we explored personal and technical antecedents of algorithm fatigue and its impact on user behavior. Using data collected from 393 users of algorithm-driven applications, we identified three key drivers of algorithm fatigue: algorithmic literacy (understanding how algorithms work), information cocoons (being exposed to repetitive content), and algorithmic opacity (a lack of transparency in how algorithms make decisions). Interestingly, while greater algorithmic literacy is often thought to enhance user satisfaction, our findings suggest it actually exacerbates fatigue. Both information cocoons and algorithmic opacity also contribute to algorithm fatigue, highlighting the need for diverse content and transparent algorithm designs. Additionally, we found a strong link between algorithm fatigue and resistance behavior, with fatigued users more likely to resist algorithmic recommendations. Overall, this study suggests developers and policymakers design more user-centric algorithms that not only excel in personalization but also reduce potential fatigue and resistance in algorithmic interactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 102749"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24002975","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Algorithmic technologies are dominating our online experiences, from content recommendations to personalized services. However, it also introduces a new challenge: algorithm fatigue. Algorithm fatigue describes the phenomenon where users experience mental and emotional exhaustion in prolonged interaction with algorithms. To decode this phenomenon, we explored personal and technical antecedents of algorithm fatigue and its impact on user behavior. Using data collected from 393 users of algorithm-driven applications, we identified three key drivers of algorithm fatigue: algorithmic literacy (understanding how algorithms work), information cocoons (being exposed to repetitive content), and algorithmic opacity (a lack of transparency in how algorithms make decisions). Interestingly, while greater algorithmic literacy is often thought to enhance user satisfaction, our findings suggest it actually exacerbates fatigue. Both information cocoons and algorithmic opacity also contribute to algorithm fatigue, highlighting the need for diverse content and transparent algorithm designs. Additionally, we found a strong link between algorithm fatigue and resistance behavior, with fatigued users more likely to resist algorithmic recommendations. Overall, this study suggests developers and policymakers design more user-centric algorithms that not only excel in personalization but also reduce potential fatigue and resistance in algorithmic interactions.
解码算法疲劳:算法素养、信息茧和算法不透明的作用
从内容推荐到个性化服务,算法技术正在主导我们的在线体验。然而,它也带来了新的挑战:算法疲劳。算法疲劳是指用户在与算法的长时间互动中出现精神和情感疲惫的现象。为了解读这一现象,我们探讨了算法疲劳的个人和技术前因及其对用户行为的影响。利用从 393 名算法驱动应用程序用户那里收集到的数据,我们确定了算法疲劳的三个关键驱动因素:算法素养(了解算法如何工作)、信息茧(接触重复内容)和算法不透明(算法如何决策缺乏透明度)。有趣的是,虽然人们通常认为提高算法素养能提高用户满意度,但我们的研究结果表明,这实际上会加剧疲劳。信息茧房和算法不透明也是造成算法疲劳的原因之一,这凸显了多样化内容和透明算法设计的必要性。此外,我们还发现算法疲劳与抵制行为之间存在密切联系,疲劳的用户更有可能抵制算法推荐。总之,本研究建议开发人员和政策制定者设计出更多以用户为中心的算法,不仅要在个性化方面表现出色,还要减少算法交互中潜在的疲劳和抵制行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信