Investigating the possible advantages of using different concentrations of transuranic elements with thorium-uranium dioxide as a fuel for PBMR-400

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Mohamed Y.M. Mohsen , Shlash A. Luhaib , Nassar Alnassar , Omer A. Magzoub , Mohamed A.E. Abdel-Rahman , Mohammed Sallah , A. Abdelghafar Galahom
{"title":"Investigating the possible advantages of using different concentrations of transuranic elements with thorium-uranium dioxide as a fuel for PBMR-400","authors":"Mohamed Y.M. Mohsen ,&nbsp;Shlash A. Luhaib ,&nbsp;Nassar Alnassar ,&nbsp;Omer A. Magzoub ,&nbsp;Mohamed A.E. Abdel-Rahman ,&nbsp;Mohammed Sallah ,&nbsp;A. Abdelghafar Galahom","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reactor reactivity control materials play a crucial role in managing the stability and efficiency of nuclear reactors by regulating neutron flux and maintaining the desired reactivity levels throughout the reactor's operational cycle. This study explores the feasibility of using transuranic dioxide (TRUO₂) as reactivity control materials in pebble bed modular reactor 400 (PBMR-400) with thorium-based fuel. The TRU elements (Np, Pu, Am, and Cm) were extracted from spent uranium dioxide (UO₂) with a discharge burnup of 45 MWD/kgHM, following 30 years of cooling. The investigation covered four Th<sup>233</sup>UO<sub>2</sub>/TRUO<sub>2</sub> mixtures, with ThO<sub>2</sub> concentrations ranging from 75% to 95% and TRUO<sub>2</sub> from 5% to 25%. This aims to determine the optimal composition that maximizes the TRUO<sub>2</sub> concentration and minimizes ThO<sub>2</sub> while preserving reactor performance in order to achieve the longest fuel cycle length with lower k<sub>eff</sub> at the beginning of the fuel cycle (BOC) to avoid excess reactivity issues. Comprehensive neutronic analyses were conducted on these fuel mixtures, including burn-up, safety parameters, and flux and power distributions. The findings showed significant improvements in the PBMR-400's neutronic performance with the proposed fuel materials. From a safety, and economic standpoint, the optimal configuration was found to be 85% ThO<sub>2</sub> and 15% TRUO<sub>2</sub>, as it provided the longest fuel cycle length with less excess reactivity at BOC and lower PPF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 105512"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197024004621","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reactor reactivity control materials play a crucial role in managing the stability and efficiency of nuclear reactors by regulating neutron flux and maintaining the desired reactivity levels throughout the reactor's operational cycle. This study explores the feasibility of using transuranic dioxide (TRUO₂) as reactivity control materials in pebble bed modular reactor 400 (PBMR-400) with thorium-based fuel. The TRU elements (Np, Pu, Am, and Cm) were extracted from spent uranium dioxide (UO₂) with a discharge burnup of 45 MWD/kgHM, following 30 years of cooling. The investigation covered four Th233UO2/TRUO2 mixtures, with ThO2 concentrations ranging from 75% to 95% and TRUO2 from 5% to 25%. This aims to determine the optimal composition that maximizes the TRUO2 concentration and minimizes ThO2 while preserving reactor performance in order to achieve the longest fuel cycle length with lower keff at the beginning of the fuel cycle (BOC) to avoid excess reactivity issues. Comprehensive neutronic analyses were conducted on these fuel mixtures, including burn-up, safety parameters, and flux and power distributions. The findings showed significant improvements in the PBMR-400's neutronic performance with the proposed fuel materials. From a safety, and economic standpoint, the optimal configuration was found to be 85% ThO2 and 15% TRUO2, as it provided the longest fuel cycle length with less excess reactivity at BOC and lower PPF.
研究使用不同浓度的超铀元素和二氧化钍-铀作为 PBMR-400 燃料的可能优势
反应堆反应性控制材料通过调节中子通量和在反应堆整个运行周期内保持所需的反应性水平,在管理核反应堆的稳定性和效率方面发挥着至关重要的作用。本研究探讨了在使用钍基燃料的鹅卵石床模块化反应堆 400(PBMR-400)中使用超铀二氧化物(TRUO₂)作为反应控制材料的可行性。TRU 元素(Np、Pu、Am 和 Cm)是从经过 30 年冷却、排出燃烧度为 45 MWD/kgHM 的乏二氧化铀 (UO₂) 中提取的。调查涵盖了四种二氧化硫(Th233UO2)/三氧化铀(TRUO2)混合物,二氧化硫浓度范围为 75% 至 95%,三氧化铀浓度范围为 5% 至 25%。这样做的目的是确定最佳成分,使 TRUO2 浓度最大化,ThO2 最小化,同时保持反应堆性能,以实现最长的燃料循环长度,在燃料循环(BOC)开始时降低 keff,避免过剩反应性问题。对这些燃料混合物进行了全面的中子分析,包括燃耗、安全参数以及通量和功率分布。研究结果表明,使用建议的燃料材料,PBMR-400 的中子性能有了明显改善。从安全和经济的角度来看,最佳配置是 85% 的二氧化硫和 15% 的三氟二苯醚,因为这种配置的燃料循环时间最长,在 BOC 时过剩反应性较低,PPF 较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in Nuclear Energy
Progress in Nuclear Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.80%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field. Please note the following: 1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy. 2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc. 3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信