Outcomes of pediatric heart transplantation in children with selected genetic syndromes

Abstract

Objective

Genetic syndromes (GSs) are often linked to congenital heart disease (CHD) and cardiomyopathy (CM). The effect of GSs on survival following pediatric heart transplant (HT) has not been well described. We aimed to compare outcomes following HT between children with a GS and those without a GS.

Methods

The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) transplantation database was merged with the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) administrative database to identify children with GS who underwent HT between 2009 and 2019. Characteristics and outcomes were compared between children with a GS (GS group) and those without a GS (no GS group).

Results

GSs were present in 225 of 2429 HT recipients (9%). The most common GSs were DiGeorge syndrome (n = 28), muscular dystrophy (n = 27), Down syndrome (n = 26), and Turner syndrome (n = 14). The incidence of CHD was higher in the GS group compared to the no GS group (54% vs 38%; P < .1); however, patient demographics, hemodynamics, renal and hepatic dysfunction, and requirements for dialysis, mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and mechanical circulatory support were not different between the 2 groups. Time on the waitlist was not significantly different between the GS and no GS groups (55 days vs 53 days; P = .4). There also was no between-group difference in the incidence of post-transplantation complications, including dialysis (8% vs 5%; P = .38), stroke (3% vs 4%; P = .34), primary graft dysfunction (2% vs 2%; P = .75), need for pacemaker (1% vs 1%; P = .84) and rejection (3.4% vs 3.4%; P = .96). Survival at 10 years post-HT was 75% for the no GS group and 72% for the GS group (P = .59). The survival curves also did not differ between patients with CM and those with CHD.

Conclusions

Children with certain GSs and end-stage heart failure can be expected to have similar post-transplantation outcomes to those without a GS. Although early and late post-transplantation care is individualized to each patient, the presence of a GS should not influence the decision to list for HT.