Variation in attendance at emergency departments in England across local areas: A system under unequal pressure

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nikita Jacob , Martin Chalkley , Rita Santos , Luigi Siciliani
{"title":"Variation in attendance at emergency departments in England across local areas: A system under unequal pressure","authors":"Nikita Jacob ,&nbsp;Martin Chalkley ,&nbsp;Rita Santos ,&nbsp;Luigi Siciliani","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Crowding in Accident and Emergency Departments (AEDs) and long waiting times are critical issues contributing to adverse patient outcomes and system inefficiencies. These challenges are exacerbated by varying levels of AED attendance across different local areas, which may reflect underlying disparities in primary care provision and population characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We used regression analysis to determine how much variation across local areas in England of attendance at emergency departments remained after controlling for population risk factors and alternative urgent care provision.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>There is substantial residual variation of the order of 3 to 1 (highest to lowest) in per person attendance rate across different areas. This is not related to in-hospital capacity as proxied by the per person number of hospital emergency doctors in an area.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Some areas in England have emergency departments that are under much greater pressure than others, and this cannot be explained in terms of their population characteristics or the availability of alternative treatment options. It is imperative to better understand the drivers of this variation so that effective interventions to address utilisation can be designed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 105186"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024001969","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Crowding in Accident and Emergency Departments (AEDs) and long waiting times are critical issues contributing to adverse patient outcomes and system inefficiencies. These challenges are exacerbated by varying levels of AED attendance across different local areas, which may reflect underlying disparities in primary care provision and population characteristics.

Method

We used regression analysis to determine how much variation across local areas in England of attendance at emergency departments remained after controlling for population risk factors and alternative urgent care provision.

Findings

There is substantial residual variation of the order of 3 to 1 (highest to lowest) in per person attendance rate across different areas. This is not related to in-hospital capacity as proxied by the per person number of hospital emergency doctors in an area.

Conclusion

Some areas in England have emergency departments that are under much greater pressure than others, and this cannot be explained in terms of their population characteristics or the availability of alternative treatment options. It is imperative to better understand the drivers of this variation so that effective interventions to address utilisation can be designed.
英格兰各地区急诊室就诊人数的差异:压力不均的系统
背景急诊室(AED)的拥挤和漫长的等待时间是导致患者不良后果和系统效率低下的关键问题。这些挑战因不同地区的急诊室就诊率不同而加剧,这可能反映了初级医疗服务和人口特征的潜在差异。方法我们使用回归分析法来确定在控制了人口风险因素和其他紧急医疗服务后,英格兰不同地区急诊室就诊率的差异程度。结论英格兰一些地区的急诊科所承受的压力比其他地区大得多,这无法用人口特征或替代治疗方案的可用性来解释。当务之急是更好地了解造成这种差异的原因,从而设计出有效的干预措施来解决利用率问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信