Evaluation of comparative efficacy of Hijama bila shart (dry cupping) and Bukhoor (steam application) in the management of low back pain

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION
M.B. Naleem , Md Wasi Akhtar , Yasmeen Shamsi , Farkhunda Jabin , Mohd Maaz
{"title":"Evaluation of comparative efficacy of Hijama bila shart (dry cupping) and Bukhoor (steam application) in the management of low back pain","authors":"M.B. Naleem ,&nbsp;Md Wasi Akhtar ,&nbsp;Yasmeen Shamsi ,&nbsp;Farkhunda Jabin ,&nbsp;Mohd Maaz","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.10.056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Low back pain is an important cause of disability. The aim of treatment is to reduce the pain and minimize its consequences. Management includes counseling and reassurance, use of analgesics, non-pharmacological therapies, and regular review.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>An open-label, randomized, and parallel-group clinical trial was conducted in which Group A patients received <em>Hijama bila Shart</em> (dry cupping) while group B patients received <em>Bukhoor</em> (medicated steam application); both therapies were given for 5 min in 3 sittings (day 1, 4 and 8).</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>Oswestry LBP Total Scores in Group A decreased from 20.70 ± 0.49 to 6.77 ± 0.37, while in Group B it decreased from 20.07 ± 3.63 to 5.83 ± 2.36. The pain intensity also decreased from 3.10 ± 0.55 to 1.57 ± 0.57 in group A, while from 2.97 ± 0.61 to 1.30 ± 0.75 in group B. Improvement in disability was also found statistically significant. On comparing the improvement in disability between the group, the difference was significant (p &lt; 0.05), and improvement in group A was a little better as compared to group B.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The effect of dry cupping may be due to increased blood circulation; lymphatic channelization and dispersion of inflammatory chemicals from the site of pain. The effect of medicated steam application may be due to the anti-inflammatory and muscle relaxing effects of steam and heat of the steam itself; the drugs used for steam application are reported to reduce inflammation on local application.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dry cupping and Medicated Steam application both are beneficial, safe, and cost effective treatment modalities for the Low back pain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224004807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Low back pain is an important cause of disability. The aim of treatment is to reduce the pain and minimize its consequences. Management includes counseling and reassurance, use of analgesics, non-pharmacological therapies, and regular review.

Method

An open-label, randomized, and parallel-group clinical trial was conducted in which Group A patients received Hijama bila Shart (dry cupping) while group B patients received Bukhoor (medicated steam application); both therapies were given for 5 min in 3 sittings (day 1, 4 and 8).

Result

Oswestry LBP Total Scores in Group A decreased from 20.70 ± 0.49 to 6.77 ± 0.37, while in Group B it decreased from 20.07 ± 3.63 to 5.83 ± 2.36. The pain intensity also decreased from 3.10 ± 0.55 to 1.57 ± 0.57 in group A, while from 2.97 ± 0.61 to 1.30 ± 0.75 in group B. Improvement in disability was also found statistically significant. On comparing the improvement in disability between the group, the difference was significant (p < 0.05), and improvement in group A was a little better as compared to group B.

Discussion

The effect of dry cupping may be due to increased blood circulation; lymphatic channelization and dispersion of inflammatory chemicals from the site of pain. The effect of medicated steam application may be due to the anti-inflammatory and muscle relaxing effects of steam and heat of the steam itself; the drugs used for steam application are reported to reduce inflammation on local application.

Conclusion

Dry cupping and Medicated Steam application both are beneficial, safe, and cost effective treatment modalities for the Low back pain.
评估 Hijama bila shart(干拔罐)和 Bukhoor(蒸汽疗法)在治疗腰背痛方面的疗效比较
导言腰背痛是导致残疾的一个重要原因。治疗的目的是减轻疼痛并尽量减少其后果。方法进行了一项开放标签、随机和平行组临床试验,A 组患者接受 Hijama bila Shart(干拔罐),B 组患者接受 Bukhoor(药用蒸汽);两种疗法均在 3 次(第 1、4 和 8 天)中进行,每次 5 分钟。结果A组患者的腰背痛总分从20.70±0.49分降至6.77±0.37分,B组患者的总分从20.07±3.63分降至5.83±2.36分。A 组的疼痛强度也从 3.10 ± 0.55 降至 1.57 ± 0.57,而 B 组则从 2.97 ± 0.61 降至 1.30 ± 0.75。讨论干拔罐的效果可能是由于促进了血液循环、淋巴疏导和炎症化学物质从疼痛部位的分散。药物蒸汽疗法的效果可能是由于蒸汽的抗炎和肌肉放松作用以及蒸汽本身的热量;据报道,用于蒸汽疗法的药物在局部应用时可减轻炎症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信