Civilian Ballistic Distal Femur Intraarticular Fracture Patterns.

Colin Cantrell, Gregory Versteeg, Haley Smith, Daniel Johnson, Erik Gerlach, Michael Stover, Bennet Butler
{"title":"Civilian Ballistic Distal Femur Intraarticular Fracture Patterns.","authors":"Colin Cantrell, Gregory Versteeg, Haley Smith, Daniel Johnson, Erik Gerlach, Michael Stover, Bennet Butler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to assess the rate and pattern of intraarticular extension of ballistic distal femur fractures. The authors examined all ballistic distal femur fractures that presented to their hospital between 2015 and 2019. The authors excluded direct condylar injuries and patients of whom a computed tomography (CT) scan was not obtained. The authors classified the rate of intraarticular extension and the pattern of that extension. Sixty-three fractures met inclusion in this study. Of these, 19 (30%) extended intraarticular, whereas the remaining 44 did not. Ninety-five percent of the fractures in the intraarticular group contained a sagittal fracture, whereas only 26% contained a fracture in the coronal plane. Ballistic distal femur fractures have a lower rate of intraarticular extension than blunt fractures. There are predictable patterns of joint involvement with ballistic injuries that warrant different treatment strategies. The authors propose a new classification system to further classify these unique fractures. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(3):178-180, 2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":516534,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the rate and pattern of intraarticular extension of ballistic distal femur fractures. The authors examined all ballistic distal femur fractures that presented to their hospital between 2015 and 2019. The authors excluded direct condylar injuries and patients of whom a computed tomography (CT) scan was not obtained. The authors classified the rate of intraarticular extension and the pattern of that extension. Sixty-three fractures met inclusion in this study. Of these, 19 (30%) extended intraarticular, whereas the remaining 44 did not. Ninety-five percent of the fractures in the intraarticular group contained a sagittal fracture, whereas only 26% contained a fracture in the coronal plane. Ballistic distal femur fractures have a lower rate of intraarticular extension than blunt fractures. There are predictable patterns of joint involvement with ballistic injuries that warrant different treatment strategies. The authors propose a new classification system to further classify these unique fractures. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(3):178-180, 2024).

平民弹道股骨远端关节内骨折模式。
本研究旨在评估弹道股骨远端骨折的关节内伸展率和模式。作者对2015年至2019年期间在其医院就诊的所有弹道股骨远端骨折进行了检查。作者排除了直接髁损伤和未进行计算机断层扫描(CT)的患者。作者对关节内伸展率和伸展模式进行了分类。有 63 例骨折符合本研究的要求。其中,19 例(30%)发生了关节内扩展,其余 44 例未发生关节内扩展。在关节内骨折组中,95%的骨折为矢状面骨折,而只有26%的骨折为冠状面骨折。与钝性骨折相比,弹道型股骨远端骨折的关节内伸展率较低。弹道损伤的关节受累模式是可以预测的,因此需要采取不同的治疗策略。作者提出了一种新的分类系统,以进一步对这些独特的骨折进行分类。(外科骨科进展杂志》33(3):178-180,2024)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信