Impact of Tourniquet Use During Intramedullary Tibial Nailing on Clinical Outcomes.

Lindsay Luce, William Barfield, Charles Cody White, Weston McDonald, Kristoff Reid, Langdon Hartsock
{"title":"Impact of Tourniquet Use During Intramedullary Tibial Nailing on Clinical Outcomes.","authors":"Lindsay Luce, William Barfield, Charles Cody White, Weston McDonald, Kristoff Reid, Langdon Hartsock","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the impact of tourniquet use during intramedullary tibial nailing on clinical outcomes at a regional Level I Trauma Center. One hundred ninety-four patients with intramedullary tibial fixation over a 5-year period at a single institution were studied following Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval. Patients were stratified into 81 polytrauma patients and 113 patients with isolated tibial shaft injuries. Patients were then stratified within these two groups according to whether or not a tourniquet was used intraoperatively (including during reaming). Postoperative narcotic use, length of stay, operating room (OR) time, tourniquet time, estimated blood loss, units of blood utilized, infection rate, and age were the outcome variables. No significant differences were found for any outcome measure (p ≥ 0.05), including age, narcotic use, OR time, postoperative inpatient days, estimated blood loss, and units of blood used between tourniquet and nontourniquet patients. Statistically significant differences were found between isolated and nonisolated fracture patients for postanesthesia care unit (PACU) morphine dose equivalents (MDEs), with isolated tibia fracture patients requiring more MDEs (13.80 vs. 9.92 units; p = 0.025). Nonisolated tibia patients had more inpatient days (14.88 vs. 3.16 days; p = 0.001), greater estimated blood loss (252.44 vs. 128.07 mL; p = 0.001), and more units of blood (5.07 vs. 2.29 units; p = 0.017). Thermal necrosis of the tibia was not seen in any patient within any group. Tourniquet use did not significantly affect clinical outcomes. This provides surgeons with updated data on the impact of tourniquet use on clinical outcomes given the modernization of techniques for tibial intramedullary nailing. There were statistically significant differences between isolated tibia fractures and polytrauma patients for postoperative length of stay, estimated blood loss, and units of blood; however, this was unrelated to tourniquet use and would be expected for polytraumatic patients who commonly have a longer postoperative recovery. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(3):181-183, 2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":516534,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","volume":"33 3","pages":"181-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the impact of tourniquet use during intramedullary tibial nailing on clinical outcomes at a regional Level I Trauma Center. One hundred ninety-four patients with intramedullary tibial fixation over a 5-year period at a single institution were studied following Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval. Patients were stratified into 81 polytrauma patients and 113 patients with isolated tibial shaft injuries. Patients were then stratified within these two groups according to whether or not a tourniquet was used intraoperatively (including during reaming). Postoperative narcotic use, length of stay, operating room (OR) time, tourniquet time, estimated blood loss, units of blood utilized, infection rate, and age were the outcome variables. No significant differences were found for any outcome measure (p ≥ 0.05), including age, narcotic use, OR time, postoperative inpatient days, estimated blood loss, and units of blood used between tourniquet and nontourniquet patients. Statistically significant differences were found between isolated and nonisolated fracture patients for postanesthesia care unit (PACU) morphine dose equivalents (MDEs), with isolated tibia fracture patients requiring more MDEs (13.80 vs. 9.92 units; p = 0.025). Nonisolated tibia patients had more inpatient days (14.88 vs. 3.16 days; p = 0.001), greater estimated blood loss (252.44 vs. 128.07 mL; p = 0.001), and more units of blood (5.07 vs. 2.29 units; p = 0.017). Thermal necrosis of the tibia was not seen in any patient within any group. Tourniquet use did not significantly affect clinical outcomes. This provides surgeons with updated data on the impact of tourniquet use on clinical outcomes given the modernization of techniques for tibial intramedullary nailing. There were statistically significant differences between isolated tibia fractures and polytrauma patients for postoperative length of stay, estimated blood loss, and units of blood; however, this was unrelated to tourniquet use and would be expected for polytraumatic patients who commonly have a longer postoperative recovery. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(3):181-183, 2024).

胫骨髓内钉术中使用止血带对临床结果的影响
这项回顾性研究旨在调查胫骨髓内钉固定过程中使用止血带对地区一级创伤中心临床疗效的影响。在获得机构审查委员会(IRB)批准后,研究人员对一家医疗机构在 5 年内接受胫骨髓内固定术的 194 名患者进行了研究。患者被分为81名多发性创伤患者和113名孤立胫骨轴损伤患者。然后根据术中是否使用止血带(包括扩孔时)对这两组患者进行分层。结果变量包括术后麻醉剂使用量、住院时间、手术室(OR)时间、止血带使用时间、估计失血量、用血单位、感染率和年龄。止血带患者与非止血带患者在年龄、麻醉剂使用量、手术室时间、术后住院天数、估计失血量和用血单位等任何结果指标方面均未发现明显差异(P≥0.05)。在麻醉后护理病房(PACU)吗啡剂量当量(MDEs)方面,孤立性和非孤立性骨折患者之间存在统计学意义上的显著差异,孤立性胫骨骨折患者需要更多的MDEs(13.80对9.92个单位;P = 0.025)。非孤立性胫骨骨折患者的住院天数更多(14.88 天 vs. 3.16 天;p = 0.001),估计失血量更大(252.44 mL vs. 128.07 mL;p = 0.001),用血单位更多(5.07 单位 vs. 2.29 单位;p = 0.017)。各组患者均未出现胫骨热坏死。止血带的使用对临床结果没有明显影响。随着胫骨髓内钉技术的现代化,这为外科医生提供了止血带使用对临床结果影响的最新数据。在术后住院时间、估计失血量和血液单位方面,孤立性胫骨骨折患者与多发性创伤患者之间存在统计学意义上的显著差异;但这与止血带的使用无关,多发性创伤患者术后恢复期通常较长,这也在意料之中。(外科骨科进展杂志》33(3):181-183,2024 年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信