Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus a Traditional Local Anesthetic in Periarticular Injections during Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Samantha Harrer, Michael Yayac, Gregory R Toci, Eric Levicoff, P Maxwell Courtney, Andrew M Star, Arjun Saxena
{"title":"Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus a Traditional Local Anesthetic in Periarticular Injections during Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Samantha Harrer, Michael Yayac, Gregory R Toci, Eric Levicoff, P Maxwell Courtney, Andrew M Star, Arjun Saxena","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Periarticular injections (PAI) are a common component to multimodal regimens in total hip arthroplasty (THA), although the efficacy of adding liposomal bupivacaine (LB) remains unclear. A meta-analysis of total knee arthroplasty did not find LB superior, but a similar study has not been performed in THA. The purpose of this study was to compare opioid consumption, pain scores, and length of stay between PAIs with LB and traditional PAIs in THA. Eleven included studies showed LB to have minor decreases in opioid consumption and length of stay. No clinically significant benefits were achieved in pain control based on minimal clinically important difference thresholds. There is not adequate evidence to suggest that the increased cost of LB merits its utilization over traditional PAI in THA. The variability in the study designs, as well as results, calls for more consistent randomized clinical trials to ascertain the true efficacy of LB. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(3):143-153, 2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":516534,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Periarticular injections (PAI) are a common component to multimodal regimens in total hip arthroplasty (THA), although the efficacy of adding liposomal bupivacaine (LB) remains unclear. A meta-analysis of total knee arthroplasty did not find LB superior, but a similar study has not been performed in THA. The purpose of this study was to compare opioid consumption, pain scores, and length of stay between PAIs with LB and traditional PAIs in THA. Eleven included studies showed LB to have minor decreases in opioid consumption and length of stay. No clinically significant benefits were achieved in pain control based on minimal clinically important difference thresholds. There is not adequate evidence to suggest that the increased cost of LB merits its utilization over traditional PAI in THA. The variability in the study designs, as well as results, calls for more consistent randomized clinical trials to ascertain the true efficacy of LB. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(3):143-153, 2024).

在全髋关节置换术中进行关节周围注射时,脂质体布比卡因与传统局麻药的疗效对比:系统回顾与元分析》。
关节周围注射(PAI)是全髋关节置换术(THA)中多模式疗法的常见组成部分,但加入脂质体布比卡因(LB)的疗效仍不明确。一项关于全膝关节置换术的荟萃分析并未发现 LB 的优越性,但在全髋关节置换术中尚未进行过类似的研究。本研究的目的是比较使用 LB 的 PAI 与传统 PAI 在 THA 中的阿片类药物消耗量、疼痛评分和住院时间。纳入的 11 项研究显示,LB 可略微减少阿片类药物的用量和住院时间。根据最小临床重要性差异阈值,在疼痛控制方面没有取得有临床意义的益处。没有足够的证据表明,在 THA 中使用 LB 比使用传统 PAI 成本增加。由于研究设计和结果存在差异,因此需要更多一致的随机临床试验来确定 LB 的真正疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信