A Comparison Between Immunohistochemistry and mRNA Expression to Identify Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Breast Cancer.

Ximena Baez-Navarro, Mieke R van Bockstal, Angelique van der Made, Carolien H M van Deurzen
{"title":"A Comparison Between Immunohistochemistry and mRNA Expression to Identify Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Breast Cancer.","authors":"Ximena Baez-Navarro, Mieke R van Bockstal, Angelique van der Made, Carolien H M van Deurzen","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2024-0255-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Breast cancers (BCs) with low levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression (HER2-low) have become a targetable subset because of novel antibody-drug conjugates. HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the recommended assay for HER2 classification but is associated with limited interobserver agreement concerning HER2-low identification.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To investigate whether mRNA expression quantified via quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) could serve as a valuable complementary and more objective method to identify HER2-low BCs.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>We selected all cases from a previously published interobserver study, which included 105 needle biopsies from HER2 nonamplified BC cases. HER2 IHC was evaluated by 16 pathologists. For the current study, mRNA was extracted from microdissected invasive tumor cells. RT-qPCR was performed for quantitative evaluation of HER2, using the cutoff values of the MammaTyper assay. We compared the mRNA expression levels with the IHC scores of the majority agreement (IHC 0, IHC >0, <1+ [ultralow], 1+, 2+) and the following HER2 subcategories: HER2 0/ultralow and HER2-low (IHC 1+ and 2+/fluorescence in situ hybridization negative).</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>In total, 88 nonamplified HER2 cases could be analyzed. Based on IHC, 17 cases were HER2 0/ultralow and 71 were HER2-low. The mean rank HER2 mRNA level was significantly higher in HER2-low cases than in the HER2 0/ultralow group (P < .001). However, 10 of 17 HER2 0/ultralow cases by IHC (58.8%) were classified as HER2-low by MammaTyper, 2 of 71 cases (2.8%) were HER2-low by IHC and HER2 0/ultralow by MammaTyper, and 2 (2.8%) were HER2-low by IHC and HER2-positive by RP-qPCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Our findings indicate a strong agreement between mRNA expression quantified by RT-qPCR and HER2 IHC scores, although there was a substantial proportion of discordant HER2 results between both methods owing to overestimation of HER2 expression by MammaTyper compared to IHC. Future large-scale trials should determine which technique is best associated with clinical outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2024-0255-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: Breast cancers (BCs) with low levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression (HER2-low) have become a targetable subset because of novel antibody-drug conjugates. HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the recommended assay for HER2 classification but is associated with limited interobserver agreement concerning HER2-low identification.

Objective.—: To investigate whether mRNA expression quantified via quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) could serve as a valuable complementary and more objective method to identify HER2-low BCs.

Design.—: We selected all cases from a previously published interobserver study, which included 105 needle biopsies from HER2 nonamplified BC cases. HER2 IHC was evaluated by 16 pathologists. For the current study, mRNA was extracted from microdissected invasive tumor cells. RT-qPCR was performed for quantitative evaluation of HER2, using the cutoff values of the MammaTyper assay. We compared the mRNA expression levels with the IHC scores of the majority agreement (IHC 0, IHC >0, <1+ [ultralow], 1+, 2+) and the following HER2 subcategories: HER2 0/ultralow and HER2-low (IHC 1+ and 2+/fluorescence in situ hybridization negative).

Results.—: In total, 88 nonamplified HER2 cases could be analyzed. Based on IHC, 17 cases were HER2 0/ultralow and 71 were HER2-low. The mean rank HER2 mRNA level was significantly higher in HER2-low cases than in the HER2 0/ultralow group (P < .001). However, 10 of 17 HER2 0/ultralow cases by IHC (58.8%) were classified as HER2-low by MammaTyper, 2 of 71 cases (2.8%) were HER2-low by IHC and HER2 0/ultralow by MammaTyper, and 2 (2.8%) were HER2-low by IHC and HER2-positive by RP-qPCR.

Conclusions.—: Our findings indicate a strong agreement between mRNA expression quantified by RT-qPCR and HER2 IHC scores, although there was a substantial proportion of discordant HER2 results between both methods owing to overestimation of HER2 expression by MammaTyper compared to IHC. Future large-scale trials should determine which technique is best associated with clinical outcome.

免疫组织化学与 mRNA 表达的比较,以鉴别人类表皮生长因子受体 2 低水平乳腺癌。
背景由于新型抗体-药物共轭物的出现,人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)表达水平较低(HER2-low)的乳腺癌(BCs)已成为一个靶向亚群。HER2免疫组化(IHC)是HER2分类的推荐检测方法,但在HER2-low的识别方面,观察者之间的一致性有限:研究通过定量反转录聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)量化的 mRNA 表达是否可作为一种有价值的补充和更客观的方法来识别 HER2 低的 BC:我们从先前发表的一项观察者间研究中选取了所有病例,其中包括 105 例 HER2 非扩增 BC 的针刺活检。16 位病理学家对 HER2 IHC 进行了评估。在本次研究中,我们从显微解剖的浸润性肿瘤细胞中提取了 mRNA。使用 MammaTyper 检测法的临界值进行 RT-qPCR 检测,对 HER2 进行定量评估。我们将 mRNA 表达水平与多数人同意的 IHC 评分(IHC 0、IHC >0、Results.-)进行了比较:共分析了 88 例非扩增 HER2 病例。根据 IHC,17 例为 HER2 0/超低,71 例为 HER2 低。HER2 低水平病例的 HER2 mRNA 平均水平明显高于 HER2 0/ultralow 组(P < .001)。然而,通过 IHC 检测的 17 例 HER2 0/ultralow 病例中有 10 例(58.8%)通过 MammaTyper 被归类为 HER2-low,71 例病例中有 2 例(2.8%)通过 IHC 检测为 HER2-low,通过 MammaTyper 检测为 HER2 0/ultralow,2 例(2.8%)通过 IHC 检测为 HER2-low,通过 RP-qPCR 检测为 HER2 阳性:我们的研究结果表明,RT-qPCR 定量的 mRNA 表达与 HER2 IHC 评分之间存在很高的一致性,但由于 MammaTyper 与 IHC 相比高估了 HER2 的表达,因此两种方法的 HER2 结果有很大一部分不一致。未来的大规模试验应确定哪种技术与临床结果最相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信