Generational Differences in Sexual Health Education Experiences Among LGBTQ+ Adolescents and Adults: Findings from a U.S. National Probability Sample.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Dakota Brandenburg, Corey Tatz, Christopher Owens, Randolph D Hubach, Debby Herbenick
{"title":"Generational Differences in Sexual Health Education Experiences Among LGBTQ+ Adolescents and Adults: Findings from a U.S. National Probability Sample.","authors":"Dakota Brandenburg, Corey Tatz, Christopher Owens, Randolph D Hubach, Debby Herbenick","doi":"10.1080/00224499.2024.2420312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Few U.S. states require school-based sex education to be representative or inclusive of LGBTQ+ people. Data suggests that adolescents' receipt of necessary topics in sex education has declined in the past 25 years, yet the literature on LGBTQ+ people's sex education experiences in the United States is largely limited to non-probability samples. Data were from a national probability sample of adolescents and adults in the United States. Individuals identifying as LGBTQ+ (<i>N</i> = 818) were asked an open-ended item about the type of sex education they would have liked to have received. Participants were classified into four generational cohorts: Boomer+, Generation X, Millennials, and Generation Z. Inductive content analyses and chi-square tests of independence were used. Having sex education that normalized LGBTQ+ identities was the most reported topic, with Boomer+ being more likely to report this and Generation X being least likely. About one-quarter of respondents indicated they would have liked any type of sex education. Millennials were more likely to report wanting more information on sexual orientation and gender identity and safe sexual practices compared to other cohorts. Nearly one-fourth of respondents indicated their sex education did not need improvement/was unnecessary. Older generations wished their sex education normalized their identities, while Generation Z and Millennials reported wanting more information on safe sex and/or sexual violence prevention. Findings from this study can inform the development of tailored sexual health education programs for LGBTQ+ individuals, particularly considering that current programming may not be different compared to the sex education received by earlier generations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sex Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sex Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2024.2420312","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Few U.S. states require school-based sex education to be representative or inclusive of LGBTQ+ people. Data suggests that adolescents' receipt of necessary topics in sex education has declined in the past 25 years, yet the literature on LGBTQ+ people's sex education experiences in the United States is largely limited to non-probability samples. Data were from a national probability sample of adolescents and adults in the United States. Individuals identifying as LGBTQ+ (N = 818) were asked an open-ended item about the type of sex education they would have liked to have received. Participants were classified into four generational cohorts: Boomer+, Generation X, Millennials, and Generation Z. Inductive content analyses and chi-square tests of independence were used. Having sex education that normalized LGBTQ+ identities was the most reported topic, with Boomer+ being more likely to report this and Generation X being least likely. About one-quarter of respondents indicated they would have liked any type of sex education. Millennials were more likely to report wanting more information on sexual orientation and gender identity and safe sexual practices compared to other cohorts. Nearly one-fourth of respondents indicated their sex education did not need improvement/was unnecessary. Older generations wished their sex education normalized their identities, while Generation Z and Millennials reported wanting more information on safe sex and/or sexual violence prevention. Findings from this study can inform the development of tailored sexual health education programs for LGBTQ+ individuals, particularly considering that current programming may not be different compared to the sex education received by earlier generations.

LGBTQ+ 青少年和成年人在性健康教育方面的代际差异:美国全国概率抽样调查结果。
美国几乎没有哪个州要求学校的性教育必须具有代表性或包容 LGBTQ+ 人士。数据显示,在过去的 25 年中,青少年接受必要的性教育主题的比例有所下降,但有关美国 LGBTQ+ 人士性教育经历的文献大多局限于非概率样本。数据来自美国青少年和成年人的全国概率样本。我们向被认定为 LGBTQ+ 的个人(N = 818)提出了一个开放式问题,询问他们希望接受哪种类型的性教育。参与者被分为四代:采用归纳内容分析和卡方独立性检验。将 LGBTQ+ 身份正常化的性教育是受访者报告最多的话题,"潮一代+"更有可能报告这一话题,而 "X 代 "最不可能。约四分之一的受访者表示,他们喜欢任何类型的性教育。与其他群体相比,千禧一代更有可能表示希望获得更多有关性取向和性别认同以及安全性行为的信息。近四分之一的受访者表示他们的性教育不需要改进/没有必要。老一代人希望他们的性教育能使他们的身份正常化,而 Z 世代和千禧一代则表示希望获得更多有关安全性行为和/或性暴力预防的信息。这项研究的结果可以为制定针对 LGBTQ+ 个人的性健康教育计划提供参考,特别是考虑到目前的计划与上一代人接受的性教育相比可能并无不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sex Research (JSR) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of articles relevant to the variety of disciplines involved in the scientific study of sexuality. JSR is designed to stimulate research and promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary sexual science. JSR publishes empirical reports, theoretical essays, literature reviews, methodological articles, historical articles, teaching papers, book reviews, and letters to the editor. JSR actively seeks submissions from researchers outside of North America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信