Right Information, Right Care, Right Patient, Right Time: Community Preferences to Inform a Self-Management Support Tool for Upper Respiratory Symptoms.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Damara Gutnick, Carlo L Lutz, Kyle Mani, Christine Weldon, Julia Trosman, Bruce Rapkin, Kimberly Jinnett, Judes Fleurimont, Savneet Kaur, Sunit Jariwala
{"title":"Right Information, Right Care, Right Patient, Right Time: Community Preferences to Inform a Self-Management Support Tool for Upper Respiratory Symptoms.","authors":"Damara Gutnick, Carlo L Lutz, Kyle Mani, Christine Weldon, Julia Trosman, Bruce Rapkin, Kimberly Jinnett, Judes Fleurimont, Savneet Kaur, Sunit Jariwala","doi":"10.1055/a-2441-6016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During and after the COVID-19 pandemic, communities must cope with several conditions that cause similar upper-respiratory symptoms but are managed differently. We describe community reactions to a self-management toolkit for patients with upper respiratory symptoms to inform mobile e-health app development. The toolkit is based on the '4R' (Right Information, Right Care, Right Patient, Right Time) care planning and management model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 4R Cold, Flu and COVID-19 Information Tool (4R-Toolkit) along with a brief evaluation survey were distributed in three ways: through a Bronx NY Allergy/Asthma clinic, through the Bronx Borough President's Office listserv, and through peer recruitment. The survey assessed respondents' perceptions of the 4R-Toolkit's accessibility, preferences for sharing symptoms with clinicians, social media use, and e-health literacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We obtained a diverse sample of 106 Bronx residents, with 83% reporting personal or a social contact with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19. Respondents varied in the information sources they preferred: computer (39%); smart phone (28%); paper (11%) and no preference (22%). Most (67%) reported that social media had at least some impact on their healthcare decisions. Regardless of media preferences, respondents were positive about the 4R-Toolkit. Out of 106 respondents, 91% believed the 4R-Toolkit would help people self-manage upper respiratory symptoms and 85% found it easy to understand. Respondents strongly endorsed retention of all 4R-Toolkit content domains with 81% indicating that they would be willing to share symptoms with providers using a 4R-Toolkit smartphone app.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 4R-Toolkit can offer patients and community members accurate and up-to-date information on COVID-19, the common cold, and the flu. The user-friendly tool is accessible to diverse individuals, including those with limited e-health literacy. It has potential to support self-management of upper respiratory symptoms and promote patient engagement with providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2441-6016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: During and after the COVID-19 pandemic, communities must cope with several conditions that cause similar upper-respiratory symptoms but are managed differently. We describe community reactions to a self-management toolkit for patients with upper respiratory symptoms to inform mobile e-health app development. The toolkit is based on the '4R' (Right Information, Right Care, Right Patient, Right Time) care planning and management model.

Methods: The 4R Cold, Flu and COVID-19 Information Tool (4R-Toolkit) along with a brief evaluation survey were distributed in three ways: through a Bronx NY Allergy/Asthma clinic, through the Bronx Borough President's Office listserv, and through peer recruitment. The survey assessed respondents' perceptions of the 4R-Toolkit's accessibility, preferences for sharing symptoms with clinicians, social media use, and e-health literacy.

Results: We obtained a diverse sample of 106 Bronx residents, with 83% reporting personal or a social contact with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19. Respondents varied in the information sources they preferred: computer (39%); smart phone (28%); paper (11%) and no preference (22%). Most (67%) reported that social media had at least some impact on their healthcare decisions. Regardless of media preferences, respondents were positive about the 4R-Toolkit. Out of 106 respondents, 91% believed the 4R-Toolkit would help people self-manage upper respiratory symptoms and 85% found it easy to understand. Respondents strongly endorsed retention of all 4R-Toolkit content domains with 81% indicating that they would be willing to share symptoms with providers using a 4R-Toolkit smartphone app.

Conclusion: The 4R-Toolkit can offer patients and community members accurate and up-to-date information on COVID-19, the common cold, and the flu. The user-friendly tool is accessible to diverse individuals, including those with limited e-health literacy. It has potential to support self-management of upper respiratory symptoms and promote patient engagement with providers.

正确的信息、正确的护理、正确的病人、正确的时间:为上呼吸道症状自我管理支持工具提供信息的社区偏好。
导言:在 COVID-19 大流行期间和之后,社区必须应对几种引起类似上呼吸道症状但管理方式不同的疾病。我们描述了社区对上呼吸道症状患者自我管理工具包的反应,为移动电子健康应用的开发提供参考。该工具包基于 "4R"(正确的信息、正确的护理、正确的患者、正确的时间)护理规划和管理模式:方法:4R 感冒、流感和 COVID-19 信息工具(4R-工具包)以及简短的评估调查通过三种方式分发:通过纽约布朗克斯过敏/哮喘诊所、布朗克斯区区长办公室列表服务器以及同行招募。调查评估了受访者对 4R 工具包可访问性的看法、与临床医生分享症状的偏好、社交媒体的使用以及电子健康知识:我们获得了由 106 名布朗克斯居民组成的不同样本,其中 83% 的受访者表示个人或社会接触中出现了 COVID-19 的症状。受访者对信息来源的偏好各不相同:电脑(39%)、智能手机(28%)、纸质(11%)和无偏好(22%)。大多数受访者(67%)表示,社交媒体至少对他们的医疗决策有一定影响。无论媒体偏好如何,受访者对 4R 工具包都持肯定态度。在 106 位受访者中,91% 的人认为 4R 工具包有助于人们自我管理上呼吸道症状,85% 的人认为它通俗易懂。81%的受访者表示愿意使用 4R-Toolkit 智能手机应用程序与医疗服务提供者分享症状:4R-工具包可为患者和社区成员提供有关 COVID-19、普通感冒和流感的最新准确信息。这种用户友好型工具可供不同人群使用,包括电子健康知识有限的人群。它具有支持上呼吸道症状自我管理和促进患者与医疗服务提供者接触的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信