Children’s arithmetic strategy use trajectories: Exploring the roles of executive functions and sociodemographic characteristics

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Kimia Akhavein , Caron A.C. Clark , Jennifer Mize Nelson , Kimberly Andrews Espy , Jenna E. Finch
{"title":"Children’s arithmetic strategy use trajectories: Exploring the roles of executive functions and sociodemographic characteristics","authors":"Kimia Akhavein ,&nbsp;Caron A.C. Clark ,&nbsp;Jennifer Mize Nelson ,&nbsp;Kimberly Andrews Espy ,&nbsp;Jenna E. Finch","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although young children often use counting to solve arithmetic problems, over time they move toward more efficient strategies such as direct retrieval and decomposition. Strategy selection has longitudinal associations with children’s math achievement. Existing research indicates that children’s executive functions (EFs) support inhibiting unnecessary strategies and adaptively switching between strategies. Moreover, research has documented gender differences in strategy use, but prior literature does not account for the contributions of socioeconomic factors in children’s strategy trajectories. The current study examined the unique roles of preschoolers’ EFs, gender, household income, and maternal education for the trajectories of strategy use on arithmetic problems across early elementary school. Preschoolers’ EFs were assessed at 5 years 3 months of age, and children completed addition and subtraction problems in first, second, and third grades. Children’s strategies were categorized as retrieval, counting, decomposition, and sign flipping. Results indicated that children with higher EFs were more likely to use retrieval and sign flipping in first grade compared with children with lower EFs, and this advantage was maintained into third grade. Boys used more retrieval and decomposition, whereas girls used more counting strategies, in first grade, and this pattern held longitudinally. Finally, children whose mothers had more years of education were likely to use decomposition and sign flipping in first grade, with an advantage through third grade. Overall, the current study sheds light on how cognitive and sociodemographic factors differentially contribute to children’s accurate strategy use, with implications for how to best target early interventions to support children’s math achievement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524002492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although young children often use counting to solve arithmetic problems, over time they move toward more efficient strategies such as direct retrieval and decomposition. Strategy selection has longitudinal associations with children’s math achievement. Existing research indicates that children’s executive functions (EFs) support inhibiting unnecessary strategies and adaptively switching between strategies. Moreover, research has documented gender differences in strategy use, but prior literature does not account for the contributions of socioeconomic factors in children’s strategy trajectories. The current study examined the unique roles of preschoolers’ EFs, gender, household income, and maternal education for the trajectories of strategy use on arithmetic problems across early elementary school. Preschoolers’ EFs were assessed at 5 years 3 months of age, and children completed addition and subtraction problems in first, second, and third grades. Children’s strategies were categorized as retrieval, counting, decomposition, and sign flipping. Results indicated that children with higher EFs were more likely to use retrieval and sign flipping in first grade compared with children with lower EFs, and this advantage was maintained into third grade. Boys used more retrieval and decomposition, whereas girls used more counting strategies, in first grade, and this pattern held longitudinally. Finally, children whose mothers had more years of education were likely to use decomposition and sign flipping in first grade, with an advantage through third grade. Overall, the current study sheds light on how cognitive and sociodemographic factors differentially contribute to children’s accurate strategy use, with implications for how to best target early interventions to support children’s math achievement.
儿童运算策略的使用轨迹:探索执行功能和社会人口特征的作用。
尽管幼儿经常使用计算来解决算术问题,但随着时间的推移,他们会逐渐采用直接检索和分解等更有效的策略。策略选择与儿童的数学成绩有着纵向联系。现有研究表明,儿童的执行功能(EFs)支持抑制不必要的策略和在策略之间进行适应性转换。此外,研究还记录了策略使用中的性别差异,但之前的文献并未考虑社会经济因素对儿童策略轨迹的影响。本研究考察了学龄前儿童的情商、性别、家庭收入和母亲教育程度对小学低年级算术问题策略使用轨迹的独特作用。研究在学龄前儿童 5 岁 3 个月时对他们的幼儿学习能力进行了评估,并让他们完成了一年级、二年级和三年级的加减法问题。儿童的策略分为检索、计算、分解和符号翻转。结果表明,与情商较低的儿童相比,情商较高的儿童在一年级时更倾向于使用检索和符号翻转,这种优势一直保持到三年级。男孩在一年级时更多地使用检索和分解策略,而女孩则更多地使用计数策略,这种模式纵向保持不变。最后,母亲受教育年限较长的儿童在一年级时可能会使用分解和符号翻转策略,这种优势一直保持到三年级。总之,本研究揭示了认知和社会人口因素如何对儿童准确使用策略产生不同的影响,并对如何最有针对性地采取早期干预措施以提高儿童的数学成绩产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信