Intraoperative patellar tracking assessment during image-based robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: technical note and reliability study.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
SICOT-J Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1051/sicotj/2024037
Cécile Batailler, Salomé Greiner, Hanna-Lisa Rekik, Flora Olivier, Elvire Servien, Sébastien Lustig
{"title":"Intraoperative patellar tracking assessment during image-based robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: technical note and reliability study.","authors":"Cécile Batailler, Salomé Greiner, Hanna-Lisa Rekik, Flora Olivier, Elvire Servien, Sébastien Lustig","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2024037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Restoration of the anterior knee compartment is increasingly studied with the development of personalized surgery. However, evaluating the patellar tracking during the surgery is still subjective and at the surgeon's discretion. This study aimed 1) to describe the assessment of the patellar tracking during robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA), 2) to describe a new measurement technique for evaluating the evolution of this patellar tracking, and 3) to assess its reliability and repeatability.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This monocentric study assessed the evolution of patellar tracking for 20 robotic-assisted TKA. The sharp probe was used to perform patellar tracking in all the arcs of knee flexion before and after the bone cuts. The patella positioning was recorded every 10° of flexion between the full extension and 90° knee flexion and was assessed in the coronal and sagittal planes. For the measurements of the patellar tracking, we used a sagittal view and a coronal view of the knee on the MAKO software. From these two views, the difference between the patellar tracking before and after the bone cuts with the definitive implants was measured. Two independent reviewers performed the measurements to assess their reliability. To determine intraobserver variability, the first observer performed the measurements twice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 68.7 years old ± 5.2 [61; 75], the mean body mass index was 28.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup> ± 4.2 [21.4; 36.2], the mean HKA angle was 176.3° ± 3.7° [174.1.4; 179.7]. The radiographic measurements showed very good to excellent intra-observer and inter-observer agreements (0.60 to 1.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This new measurement technique assessed the evolution of patellar tracking after TKA with good inter and intra-observer reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":"10 ","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523864/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SICOT-J","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2024037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Restoration of the anterior knee compartment is increasingly studied with the development of personalized surgery. However, evaluating the patellar tracking during the surgery is still subjective and at the surgeon's discretion. This study aimed 1) to describe the assessment of the patellar tracking during robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA), 2) to describe a new measurement technique for evaluating the evolution of this patellar tracking, and 3) to assess its reliability and repeatability.

Method: This monocentric study assessed the evolution of patellar tracking for 20 robotic-assisted TKA. The sharp probe was used to perform patellar tracking in all the arcs of knee flexion before and after the bone cuts. The patella positioning was recorded every 10° of flexion between the full extension and 90° knee flexion and was assessed in the coronal and sagittal planes. For the measurements of the patellar tracking, we used a sagittal view and a coronal view of the knee on the MAKO software. From these two views, the difference between the patellar tracking before and after the bone cuts with the definitive implants was measured. Two independent reviewers performed the measurements to assess their reliability. To determine intraobserver variability, the first observer performed the measurements twice.

Results: The mean age was 68.7 years old ± 5.2 [61; 75], the mean body mass index was 28.8 kg/m2 ± 4.2 [21.4; 36.2], the mean HKA angle was 176.3° ± 3.7° [174.1.4; 179.7]. The radiographic measurements showed very good to excellent intra-observer and inter-observer agreements (0.60 to 1.0).

Conclusion: This new measurement technique assessed the evolution of patellar tracking after TKA with good inter and intra-observer reliability.

基于图像的机器人辅助全膝关节置换术中的术中髌骨跟踪评估:技术说明和可靠性研究。
简介随着个性化手术的发展,对膝关节前束恢复的研究越来越多。然而,手术中对髌骨跟踪的评估仍是主观的,由外科医生决定。本研究旨在:1)描述机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(TKA)期间髌骨追踪的评估;2)描述评估髌骨追踪演变的新测量技术;3)评估其可靠性和可重复性:这项单中心研究评估了 20 例机器人辅助 TKA 的髌骨跟踪演变情况。在切骨前后的所有膝关节屈曲弧线上,使用锋利的探针进行髌骨跟踪。在膝关节完全伸直和屈曲90°之间,每屈曲10°记录一次髌骨定位,并在冠状面和矢状面进行评估。为了测量髌骨跟踪,我们在 MAKO 软件上使用了膝关节的矢状面和冠状面。通过这两个视图,我们测量了使用最终植入物切骨前后髌骨轨迹的差异。由两名独立审查员进行测量以评估其可靠性。为了确定观察者内部的变异性,第一位观察者进行了两次测量:平均年龄为 68.7 岁 ± 5.2 [61; 75],平均体重指数为 28.8 kg/m2 ± 4.2 [21.4; 36.2],平均 HKA 角度为 176.3° ± 3.7° [174.1.4; 179.7]。影像学测量结果表明,观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性非常好,甚至非常好(0.60 至 1.0):结论:这一新的测量技术可评估TKA术后髌骨追踪的演变情况,其观察者之间和观察者内部的可靠性都很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SICOT-J
SICOT-J ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信