Decoding the Influence of eHealth on Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness in Older Adults: Qualitative Analysis of Self-Determination Through the Motivational Technology Model.

IF 5 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.2196/56923
Lynne M Cotter, Dhavan Shah, Kaitlyn Brown, Marie-Louise Mares, Gina Landucci, Sydney Saunders, Darcie C Johnston, Klaren Pe-Romashko, David Gustafson, Adam Maus, Kasey Thompson, David H Gustafson
{"title":"Decoding the Influence of eHealth on Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness in Older Adults: Qualitative Analysis of Self-Determination Through the Motivational Technology Model.","authors":"Lynne M Cotter, Dhavan Shah, Kaitlyn Brown, Marie-Louise Mares, Gina Landucci, Sydney Saunders, Darcie C Johnston, Klaren Pe-Romashko, David Gustafson, Adam Maus, Kasey Thompson, David H Gustafson","doi":"10.2196/56923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults adopt and use eHealth systems to build autonomy, competence, and relatedness and engage in healthy behaviors. The motivational technology model posits that technology features, such as those on websites, smart displays, and mobile phones, must allow for navigability, interactivity, and customizability, which spur feelings of self-determination and intrinsic motivation. We studied ElderTree, an online system for older adults that provides on-demand videos of healthy living content, self-monitoring, and weekly researcher-hosted video meetings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to understand the theoretical crossover between the motivational technology model and self-determination theory using features of ElderTree to understand the usability of the technology and how it may support older adults' autonomy, competence, and relatedness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Drawing participants from a randomized controlled trial of a mobile health app for older adults with multiple chronic conditions, we conducted qualitative interviews with 22 older adults about their use of the app; the interviews were coded using qualitative thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Older adults did find that features within ElderTree such as content available on demand, good navigation, and weekly researcher-led video calls supported feelings of autonomy, competence, and relatedness, respectively. Individual differences such as a background using computers also influenced participants' experiences with the smart displays.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants confirmed the features that increased internal motivation, such as interactivity correlating with feelings of relatedness, but they also found other ways to support autonomous health behavior change beyond narrow views of navigability, interactivity, and customization.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"7 ","pages":"e56923"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/56923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Older adults adopt and use eHealth systems to build autonomy, competence, and relatedness and engage in healthy behaviors. The motivational technology model posits that technology features, such as those on websites, smart displays, and mobile phones, must allow for navigability, interactivity, and customizability, which spur feelings of self-determination and intrinsic motivation. We studied ElderTree, an online system for older adults that provides on-demand videos of healthy living content, self-monitoring, and weekly researcher-hosted video meetings.

Objective: We aimed to understand the theoretical crossover between the motivational technology model and self-determination theory using features of ElderTree to understand the usability of the technology and how it may support older adults' autonomy, competence, and relatedness.

Methods: Drawing participants from a randomized controlled trial of a mobile health app for older adults with multiple chronic conditions, we conducted qualitative interviews with 22 older adults about their use of the app; the interviews were coded using qualitative thematic analysis.

Results: Older adults did find that features within ElderTree such as content available on demand, good navigation, and weekly researcher-led video calls supported feelings of autonomy, competence, and relatedness, respectively. Individual differences such as a background using computers also influenced participants' experiences with the smart displays.

Conclusions: Participants confirmed the features that increased internal motivation, such as interactivity correlating with feelings of relatedness, but they also found other ways to support autonomous health behavior change beyond narrow views of navigability, interactivity, and customization.

解码电子健康对老年人自主性、能力和相关性的影响:通过动机技术模型对自我决定的定性分析。
背景:老年人采用和使用电子健康系统是为了建立自主性、能力和相关性,并参与健康行为。激励性技术模型认为,网站、智能显示屏和手机等技术功能必须具有可浏览性、互动性和可定制性,从而激发自我决定感和内在动力。我们对 ElderTree 进行了研究,这是一个面向老年人的在线系统,提供健康生活内容的点播视频、自我监控以及每周由研究人员主持的视频会议:我们旨在利用 ElderTree 的特点了解激励技术模型和自我决定理论之间的理论交叉,从而了解该技术的可用性以及它如何支持老年人的自主性、能力和相关性:我们从一项针对患有多种慢性疾病的老年人的移动健康应用程序随机对照试验中抽取参与者,对 22 位老年人进行了定性访谈,了解他们对该应用程序的使用情况;访谈内容采用定性主题分析法进行编码:结果:老年人确实发现 ElderTree 的功能,如按需提供的内容、良好的导航和每周由研究人员引导的视频通话,分别支持了自主感、能力感和相关感。电脑使用背景等个体差异也影响了参与者对智能显示器的体验:参与者确认了能增强内在动力的功能,如互动性与相关感的关联,但他们也发现了除导航性、互动性和定制化等狭隘观点之外的其他支持自主健康行为改变的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信