Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke MD , Robert A. Huddart PhD , Mehmet A. Bilen MD , Arjun Balar MD , Daniel Castellano MD , Srikala S Sridhar MD , Ugo De Giorgi MD , Konstantin Penkov PhD , Aleksandr Vasiliev MD , Avivit Peer MD , Riikka Järvinen MD , Hakan Harputluoğlu PhD , Vadim S. Koshkin MD , Shermeen Poushnejad MBA , Tianhua Wang PhD , Anila Qureshi MD , Mary A. Tagliaferri MD , Jonathan Zalevsky PhD , Yohann Loriot PhD
{"title":"Bempegaldesleukin plus nivolumab in first-line advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma: Results from a phase II single-arm study (PIVOT-10)","authors":"Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke MD , Robert A. Huddart PhD , Mehmet A. Bilen MD , Arjun Balar MD , Daniel Castellano MD , Srikala S Sridhar MD , Ugo De Giorgi MD , Konstantin Penkov PhD , Aleksandr Vasiliev MD , Avivit Peer MD , Riikka Järvinen MD , Hakan Harputluoğlu PhD , Vadim S. Koshkin MD , Shermeen Poushnejad MBA , Tianhua Wang PhD , Anila Qureshi MD , Mary A. Tagliaferri MD , Jonathan Zalevsky PhD , Yohann Loriot PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.09.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In PIVOT-02, bempegaldesleukin (BEMPEG), a pegylated interleukin-2 cytokine prodrug, in combination with nivolumab (NIVO), a Programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor, demonstrated the potential to provide additional benefits over immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy in patients with urothelial carcinoma, warranting further investigation. We evaluated BEMPEG plus NIVO in cisplatin-ineligible patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase II study enrolled patients with locally advanced/surgically unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma and who were ineligible for cisplatin-based treatment. Patients received BEMPEG plus NIVO were administered intravenously every 3 weeks for ≤2 years or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review (BICR) in patients with low programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression. Secondary endpoints included ORR and duration of response in the overall population. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were exploratory endpoints.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred and eighty-eight patients were enrolled; 123 patients were PD-L1 low (combined positive score [CPS] <10; 65.4%), 59 were PD-L1 high (31.4%; CPS ≥10), and 6 had PD-L1 status unknown (3.2%). ORR per blinded independent central review in patients with PD-L1-low tumors was 17.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.6–25.8) while in all treated patients was 19.7% (95% CI 14.3–26.1). Median PFS and OS in the overall population were 3.0 months and 12.6 months, respectively. BEMPEG plus NIVO combination was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to previously reported trials; no new or unexpected safety signals were reported.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>BEMPEG plus NIVO did not meet the efficacy threshold for ORR in patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma and low PD-L1 expression.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":"43 5","pages":"Pages 330.e1-330.e9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078143924006719","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
In PIVOT-02, bempegaldesleukin (BEMPEG), a pegylated interleukin-2 cytokine prodrug, in combination with nivolumab (NIVO), a Programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor, demonstrated the potential to provide additional benefits over immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy in patients with urothelial carcinoma, warranting further investigation. We evaluated BEMPEG plus NIVO in cisplatin-ineligible patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.
Methods
This open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase II study enrolled patients with locally advanced/surgically unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma and who were ineligible for cisplatin-based treatment. Patients received BEMPEG plus NIVO were administered intravenously every 3 weeks for ≤2 years or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review (BICR) in patients with low programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression. Secondary endpoints included ORR and duration of response in the overall population. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were exploratory endpoints.
Results
One hundred and eighty-eight patients were enrolled; 123 patients were PD-L1 low (combined positive score [CPS] <10; 65.4%), 59 were PD-L1 high (31.4%; CPS ≥10), and 6 had PD-L1 status unknown (3.2%). ORR per blinded independent central review in patients with PD-L1-low tumors was 17.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.6–25.8) while in all treated patients was 19.7% (95% CI 14.3–26.1). Median PFS and OS in the overall population were 3.0 months and 12.6 months, respectively. BEMPEG plus NIVO combination was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to previously reported trials; no new or unexpected safety signals were reported.
Conclusions
BEMPEG plus NIVO did not meet the efficacy threshold for ORR in patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma and low PD-L1 expression.
期刊介绍:
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.