Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis: Optimal Tests to Differentiate From Flares.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Susan M Goodman, Insa Mannstadt, Kathleen Tam, Bella Mehta, Alejandro Kochen, Lorien Shakib, Peter Sculco, Alberto Carli, Stephen Batter, Jose Rodriguez, Anne R Bass, Jason L Blevins, Andy O Miller, Linda Russell, Laura Donlin, Allina Nocon, Mark Figgie
{"title":"Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis: Optimal Tests to Differentiate From Flares.","authors":"Susan M Goodman, Insa Mannstadt, Kathleen Tam, Bella Mehta, Alejandro Kochen, Lorien Shakib, Peter Sculco, Alberto Carli, Stephen Batter, Jose Rodriguez, Anne R Bass, Jason L Blevins, Andy O Miller, Linda Russell, Laura Donlin, Allina Nocon, Mark Figgie","doi":"10.1097/RHU.0000000000002157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) is challenging, as features of IA flares can mimic infection. We aimed to cross-sectionally determine if the optimal tests to diagnose PJI in osteoarthritis were present in patients with IA flares.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled patients from October 2020 to July 2022 in 3 groups: (a) PJI-total joint arthroplasty patients undergoing revision for infection, (b) IA Flare-IA patients with a flaring native joint, and (c) IA Aseptic-total joint arthroplasty patients with IA undergoing aseptic arthroplasty revision. We compared blood and synovial fluid markers between the cohorts using Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher exact tests to assess marker sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 52 cases overall, 40% had rheumatoid arthritis, 20% psoriatic arthritis, and 11% osteoarthritis (in PJI group). PJI cases had higher C-reactive protein (CRP) and synovial fluid polymorphonuclear neutrophil percentage (%PMN). Alpha-defensin tested positive in 93% of PJI cases, 20% of IA Flares, and 6% of IA Aseptic (p < 0.01). Synovial white blood cell count >3000/μL and positive alpha-defensin were highly sensitive (100%) in diagnosing infection; however, specificity was 50% for white blood cell counts and 79% for alpha-defensin. PJI diagnosis was nearly 5 times more likely with positive alpha-defensin and almost 6 times more likely with %PMNs >80. Blood markers interleukin-6, procalcitonin, and d-dimer were neither sensitive nor specific, whereas erythrocyte sedimentation rate and CRP showed 80% sensitivity, but 47% and 58% respective specificities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although synovial %PMNs, CRP, and alpha-defensin are sensitive tests for diagnosing PJI, they are less specific and may be positive in IA flares.</p>","PeriodicalId":14745,"journal":{"name":"JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000002157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) is challenging, as features of IA flares can mimic infection. We aimed to cross-sectionally determine if the optimal tests to diagnose PJI in osteoarthritis were present in patients with IA flares.

Methods: We enrolled patients from October 2020 to July 2022 in 3 groups: (a) PJI-total joint arthroplasty patients undergoing revision for infection, (b) IA Flare-IA patients with a flaring native joint, and (c) IA Aseptic-total joint arthroplasty patients with IA undergoing aseptic arthroplasty revision. We compared blood and synovial fluid markers between the cohorts using Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher exact tests to assess marker sensitivity and specificity.

Results: Of 52 cases overall, 40% had rheumatoid arthritis, 20% psoriatic arthritis, and 11% osteoarthritis (in PJI group). PJI cases had higher C-reactive protein (CRP) and synovial fluid polymorphonuclear neutrophil percentage (%PMN). Alpha-defensin tested positive in 93% of PJI cases, 20% of IA Flares, and 6% of IA Aseptic (p < 0.01). Synovial white blood cell count >3000/μL and positive alpha-defensin were highly sensitive (100%) in diagnosing infection; however, specificity was 50% for white blood cell counts and 79% for alpha-defensin. PJI diagnosis was nearly 5 times more likely with positive alpha-defensin and almost 6 times more likely with %PMNs >80. Blood markers interleukin-6, procalcitonin, and d-dimer were neither sensitive nor specific, whereas erythrocyte sedimentation rate and CRP showed 80% sensitivity, but 47% and 58% respective specificities.

Conclusions: Although synovial %PMNs, CRP, and alpha-defensin are sensitive tests for diagnosing PJI, they are less specific and may be positive in IA flares.

炎症性关节炎患者的假体周围关节感染:区分炎症性关节炎的最佳检测方法
目的:诊断炎症性关节炎(IA)患者的假体周围关节感染(PJI)具有挑战性,因为IA发作的特征可能与感染相似。我们的目的是横向确定诊断骨关节炎患者 PJI 的最佳检查是否存在于 IA 复发患者中:我们在 2020 年 10 月至 2022 年 7 月期间招募了 3 组患者:(a)PJI--因感染接受翻修的全关节关节成形术患者;(b)IA 爆发--原生关节外翻的 IA 患者;以及(c)IA 无菌--接受无菌关节成形术翻修的 IA 全关节关节成形术患者。我们使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和费舍尔精确检验比较了各组间的血液和滑液标记物,以评估标记物的敏感性和特异性:在52例病例中,40%患有类风湿性关节炎,20%患有银屑病关节炎,11%患有骨关节炎(PJI组)。PJI病例的C反应蛋白(CRP)和滑膜液多形核中性粒细胞百分比(%PMN)较高。93% 的 PJI 病例、20% 的 IA Flares 病例和 6% 的 IA Aseptic 病例的α-防御素检测呈阳性(P < 0.01)。滑膜白细胞计数>3000/μL和α-防御素阳性对诊断感染高度敏感(100%);但白细胞计数的特异性为50%,α-防御素的特异性为79%。α-防御素呈阳性时,PJI 诊断的可能性几乎是α-防御素呈阳性时的 5 倍,PMNs 百分比大于 80 时,PJI 诊断的可能性几乎是α-防御素呈阳性时的 6 倍。血液标记物白细胞介素-6、降钙素原和二聚体既不敏感也不特异,而红细胞沉降率和 CRP 的敏感性为 80%,但特异性分别为 47% 和 58%:结论:尽管滑膜PMNs%、CRP和α-防御素是诊断PJI的敏感检测指标,但它们的特异性较低,在IA复发时可能呈阳性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
228
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology the peer-reviewed, bimonthly journal that rheumatologists asked for. Each issue contains practical information on patient care in a clinically oriented, easy-to-read format. Our commitment is to timely, relevant coverage of the topics and issues shaping current practice. We pack each issue with original articles, case reports, reviews, brief reports, expert commentary, letters to the editor, and more. This is where you''ll find the answers to tough patient management issues as well as the latest information about technological advances affecting your practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信