Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safety, and Clinical Outcomes of Ginsenosides as Adjuvant Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
IF 2.9 3区 医学Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
{"title":"Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safety, and Clinical Outcomes of Ginsenosides as Adjuvant Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.","authors":"Renjie Zhang, Yiling Liao, Yuan Gao, Hengyu Tian, Shenfeng Wu, Qingteng Zeng, Qinghua He, Ruikun Zhang, Chunshan Wei, Jialin Liu","doi":"10.1177/15347354241293790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Ginsenosides (GS), including total GS, Rh2, Rg3 and compound K (CK), have been utilized as adjuvants in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), surgery, and chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) therapy. However, the safety and efficacy of such combination treatments have been contradictory across different studies. This study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of GS as adjuvant therapy for HCC. <b>Methods</b>: A literature search of PubMed, CNKI, Wanfang Data, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted up to May 2024 for clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on GS-based adjuvant treatments for HCC. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted relevant data, and assessed study quality. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4. <b>Results</b>: Nineteen articles involving 1448 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that GS as an adjuvant therapy for HCC improved disease control rate (risk ratio (RR) = 1.42, 95% CI [1.26, 1.60]), objective response rate (RR = 1.20, 95% CI [1.09, 1.32]), life quality (RR = 1.49, 95% CI [1.23, 1.79]), 1-year overall survival rate (RR = 1.27, 95% CI [1.06, 1.52]), 2-year overall survival rate (RR = 1.43, 95% CI [1.06, 1.95]), ehanced Child-Pugh in A level (RR = 1.59, 95% CI [1.08, 2.34]), Child-Pugh in B level (RR = 1.28, 95% CI [1.08, 1.52]); increased CD3<sup>+</sup> (MD = 8.81, 95% CI [3.91, 13.71]), NKC (MD = 8.00, 95% CI [6.76, 9.24]) and CD4<sup>+</sup> (MD = 9.38, 95% CI [8.04, 10.72]), and reduced incidence of adverse reactions including nausea and vomiting (RR = 0.66, 95% CI [0.57, 0.77]), anorexia (RR = 0.33, 95% CI [0.21, 0.50]), leukopenia (RR = 0.55, 95% CI [0.46, 0.67]) and myelosuppression (RR = 0.54, 95% CI [0.40, 0.74]); decreased Child-Pugh in C level (RR = 0.43, 95% CI [0.27, 0.68]) and CD4<sup>+</sup>/CD8<sup>+</sup> ratio (MD = 0.50, 95% CI [0.47, 0.57]). <b>Conclusions</b>: In summary, GS combined with Western medical approaches (TACE, surgery, chemotherapy) for the treatment of HCC can improve clinical efficacy, increase overall survival rates, enhance patient life quality, and reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions. However, due to the generally low quality of the included studies, more large-sample, multi-center, high-quality, RCTs are warranted to further consolidate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13734,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Cancer Therapies","volume":"23 ","pages":"15347354241293790"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11526256/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Cancer Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347354241293790","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Ginsenosides (GS), including total GS, Rh2, Rg3 and compound K (CK), have been utilized as adjuvants in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), surgery, and chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) therapy. However, the safety and efficacy of such combination treatments have been contradictory across different studies. This study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of GS as adjuvant therapy for HCC. Methods: A literature search of PubMed, CNKI, Wanfang Data, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted up to May 2024 for clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on GS-based adjuvant treatments for HCC. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted relevant data, and assessed study quality. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4. Results: Nineteen articles involving 1448 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that GS as an adjuvant therapy for HCC improved disease control rate (risk ratio (RR) = 1.42, 95% CI [1.26, 1.60]), objective response rate (RR = 1.20, 95% CI [1.09, 1.32]), life quality (RR = 1.49, 95% CI [1.23, 1.79]), 1-year overall survival rate (RR = 1.27, 95% CI [1.06, 1.52]), 2-year overall survival rate (RR = 1.43, 95% CI [1.06, 1.95]), ehanced Child-Pugh in A level (RR = 1.59, 95% CI [1.08, 2.34]), Child-Pugh in B level (RR = 1.28, 95% CI [1.08, 1.52]); increased CD3+ (MD = 8.81, 95% CI [3.91, 13.71]), NKC (MD = 8.00, 95% CI [6.76, 9.24]) and CD4+ (MD = 9.38, 95% CI [8.04, 10.72]), and reduced incidence of adverse reactions including nausea and vomiting (RR = 0.66, 95% CI [0.57, 0.77]), anorexia (RR = 0.33, 95% CI [0.21, 0.50]), leukopenia (RR = 0.55, 95% CI [0.46, 0.67]) and myelosuppression (RR = 0.54, 95% CI [0.40, 0.74]); decreased Child-Pugh in C level (RR = 0.43, 95% CI [0.27, 0.68]) and CD4+/CD8+ ratio (MD = 0.50, 95% CI [0.47, 0.57]). Conclusions: In summary, GS combined with Western medical approaches (TACE, surgery, chemotherapy) for the treatment of HCC can improve clinical efficacy, increase overall survival rates, enhance patient life quality, and reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions. However, due to the generally low quality of the included studies, more large-sample, multi-center, high-quality, RCTs are warranted to further consolidate these findings.
背景:人参皂苷(GS),包括总 GS、Rh2、Rg3 和化合物 K(CK),已被用作经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)、手术和化疗治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的辅助药物。然而,在不同的研究中,这种联合疗法的安全性和有效性却存在矛盾。本研究旨在系统评估 GS 作为 HCC 辅助疗法的疗效和安全性。研究方法截至 2024 年 5 月,我们在 PubMed、CNKI、万方数据、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase 和 Web of Science 中检索了有关基于 GS 的 HCC 辅助治疗的临床随机对照试验 (RCT)。两名研究人员独立筛选文献、提取相关数据并评估研究质量。使用RevMan 5.4进行元分析。结果:共纳入19篇文章,涉及1448名患者。Meta 分析表明,GS 作为 HCC 的辅助治疗可提高疾病控制率(风险比 (RR) = 1.42,95% CI [1.26,1.60])、客观反应率(RR = 1.20,95% CI [1.09,1.32])、生活质量(RR = 1.49,95% CI [1.23,1.79])、1 年总生存率(RR = 1.27,95% CI [1.06,1.52])、2 年总生存率(RR = 1.43,95% CI [1.06,1.95])、Child-Pugh 在 A 级(RR = 1.59,95% CI [1.08,2.34])、Child-Pugh 在 B 级(RR = 1.28,95% CI [1.08,1.52]);CD3+(MD = 8.81,95% CI [3.91,13.71])、NKC(MD = 8.00,95% CI [6.76,9.24])和 CD4+(MD = 9.38,95% CI [8.04,10.72])增加,恶心呕吐(RR = 0.66,95% CI [0.57,0.77])、厌食(RR = 0.33,95% CI [0.21,0.50])、白细胞减少(RR = 0.55,95% CI [0.46,0.67])和骨髓抑制(RR = 0.54,95% CI [0.40,0.74]);Child-Pugh in C 水平下降(RR = 0.43,95% CI [0.27,0.68])和 CD4+/CD8+ 比值下降(MD = 0.50,95% CI [0.47,0.57])。结论综上所述,GS联合西医方法(TACE、手术、化疗)治疗HCC可提高临床疗效,增加总生存率,改善患者生活质量,减少不良反应的发生。然而,由于纳入研究的质量普遍较低,因此需要更多的大样本、多中心、高质量的 RCT 研究来进一步巩固这些研究结果。
期刊介绍:
ICT is the first journal to spearhead and focus on a new and growing movement in cancer treatment. The journal emphasizes scientific understanding of alternative medicine and traditional medicine therapies, and their responsible integration with conventional health care. Integrative care includes therapeutic interventions in diet, lifestyle, exercise, stress care, and nutritional supplements, as well as experimental vaccines, chrono-chemotherapy, and other advanced treatments. Contributors are leading oncologists, researchers, nurses, and health-care professionals.