Breathing techniques to reduce symptoms in people with serious respiratory illness: a systematic review.

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Respiratory Review Pub Date : 2024-10-30 Print Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1183/16000617.0012-2024
Angela T Burge, Adelle M Gadowski, Alice Jones, Lorena Romero, Natasha E Smallwood, Magnus Ekström, Lynn F Reinke, Ravijyot Saggu, Marlies Wijsenbeek, Anne E Holland
{"title":"Breathing techniques to reduce symptoms in people with serious respiratory illness: a systematic review.","authors":"Angela T Burge, Adelle M Gadowski, Alice Jones, Lorena Romero, Natasha E Smallwood, Magnus Ekström, Lynn F Reinke, Ravijyot Saggu, Marlies Wijsenbeek, Anne E Holland","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0012-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In adults with serious respiratory illness, breathlessness is prevalent and associated with reduced health-related quality of life. The aim of this review was to assess the impact of breathing techniques on breathlessness in adults with serious respiratory illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases were searched to identify randomised controlled trials testing breathing techniques (techniques that aim to alter the respiratory pattern, excluding respiratory muscle training) in people with serious respiratory illness. The primary outcome was breathlessness and secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life and adverse events. Two authors independently screened for inclusion, evaluated risk of bias and extracted data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>73 randomised controlled trials were included with 5479 participants, most with COPD or asthma. Breathing exercises (pursed lip and/or diaphragmatic breathing) reduced breathlessness measured by the modified Medical Research Council scale compared to usual care (mean difference (MD) -0.40 points, 95% CI -0.70- -0.11, eight studies, n=323), although the effect did not exceed the minimal important difference. Yoga breathing also improved modified Medical Research Council score compared to usual care (MD -1.05 points, 95% CI -2.45-0.35, three studies, n=175). Breathing techniques consistently improved health-related quality of life in people with COPD and asthma on multiple health-related quality of life measures in comparison to usual care, with effects that generally exceeded the minimal important difference. No adverse events related to breathing techniques were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Breathing techniques may improve breathlessness, and consistently improve health-related quality of life, in people with serious respiratory illness. These findings support the use of breathing exercises in the care of people with serious respiratory illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"33 174","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11522968/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0012-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In adults with serious respiratory illness, breathlessness is prevalent and associated with reduced health-related quality of life. The aim of this review was to assess the impact of breathing techniques on breathlessness in adults with serious respiratory illness.

Methods: Electronic databases were searched to identify randomised controlled trials testing breathing techniques (techniques that aim to alter the respiratory pattern, excluding respiratory muscle training) in people with serious respiratory illness. The primary outcome was breathlessness and secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life and adverse events. Two authors independently screened for inclusion, evaluated risk of bias and extracted data.

Results: 73 randomised controlled trials were included with 5479 participants, most with COPD or asthma. Breathing exercises (pursed lip and/or diaphragmatic breathing) reduced breathlessness measured by the modified Medical Research Council scale compared to usual care (mean difference (MD) -0.40 points, 95% CI -0.70- -0.11, eight studies, n=323), although the effect did not exceed the minimal important difference. Yoga breathing also improved modified Medical Research Council score compared to usual care (MD -1.05 points, 95% CI -2.45-0.35, three studies, n=175). Breathing techniques consistently improved health-related quality of life in people with COPD and asthma on multiple health-related quality of life measures in comparison to usual care, with effects that generally exceeded the minimal important difference. No adverse events related to breathing techniques were reported.

Conclusion: Breathing techniques may improve breathlessness, and consistently improve health-related quality of life, in people with serious respiratory illness. These findings support the use of breathing exercises in the care of people with serious respiratory illness.

减少严重呼吸系统疾病患者症状的呼吸技巧:系统综述。
背景:在患有严重呼吸系统疾病的成人中,呼吸困难是一种普遍现象,并与健康相关的生活质量下降有关。本综述旨在评估呼吸技巧对患有严重呼吸系统疾病的成年人呼吸困难的影响:对电子数据库进行了检索,以确定针对严重呼吸系统疾病患者测试呼吸技术(旨在改变呼吸模式的技术,不包括呼吸肌训练)的随机对照试验。主要结果是呼吸困难,次要结果是与健康相关的生活质量和不良事件。两位作者独立筛选纳入试验、评估偏倚风险并提取数据:结果:共纳入了 73 项随机对照试验,共有 5479 名参与者,其中大部分患有慢性阻塞性肺病或哮喘。与常规护理相比,呼吸练习(抿唇呼吸和/或横膈膜呼吸)减少了改良医学研究委员会量表测量的窒息感(平均差(MD)-0.40 分,95% CI -0.70--0.11,8 项研究,n=323),尽管效果未超过最小重要差异。与常规护理相比,瑜伽呼吸也能提高医学研究委员会的修正评分(MD -1.05分,95% CI -2.45-0.35,三项研究,人数=175)。与常规护理相比,呼吸技巧能持续改善慢性阻塞性肺病和哮喘患者在多种健康相关生活质量测量指标上的健康相关生活质量,其效果通常超过最小重要差异。没有与呼吸技巧相关的不良事件报告:呼吸技巧可改善呼吸困难,并持续改善严重呼吸系统疾病患者的健康相关生活质量。这些研究结果支持在重症呼吸系统疾病患者的护理中使用呼吸练习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Respiratory Review
European Respiratory Review Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
1.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Review (ERR) is an open-access journal published by the European Respiratory Society (ERS), serving as a vital resource for respiratory professionals by delivering updates on medicine, science, and surgery in the field. ERR features state-of-the-art review articles, editorials, correspondence, and summaries of recent research findings and studies covering a wide range of topics including COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pulmonary infections. Articles are published continuously and compiled into quarterly issues within a single annual volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信