Comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors for recurrent nephrolithiasis among patients with pre-existing nephrolithiasis or gout: target trial emulation studies.

IF 105.7 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Natalie McCormick, Chio Yokose, Na Lu, Deborah J Wexler, J Antonio Aviña-Zubieta, Mary A De Vera, Saiajay Chigurupati, Kiara Tan, Chixiang Chen, Rozalina McCoy, Gary C Curhan, Hyon K Choi
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors for recurrent nephrolithiasis among patients with pre-existing nephrolithiasis or gout: target trial emulation studies.","authors":"Natalie McCormick, Chio Yokose, Na Lu, Deborah J Wexler, J Antonio Aviña-Zubieta, Mary A De Vera, Saiajay Chigurupati, Kiara Tan, Chixiang Chen, Rozalina McCoy, Gary C Curhan, Hyon K Choi","doi":"10.1136/bmj-2024-080035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To emulate target trials comparing recurrence of nephrolithiasis among patients with pre-existing nephrolithiasis (overall and stratified by concomitant gout) initiating sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors versus an active comparator.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Target trial emulation studies.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Canadian population database, January 2014 to June 2022.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>20 146 patients with nephrolithiasis and type 2 diabetes, including those with concomitant gout at baseline, a high risk group.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Initiation of an SGLT-2 inhibitor or glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, with a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor as alternative comparator.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was recurrent nephrolithiasis events ascertained from diagnoses during emergency department visits, hospital admissions, or outpatient visits. Secondary outcomes included nephrolithiasis resulting in hospital admission or emergency department visits and flare-up of gout, as well as a positive control outcome (genital infection) and negative control outcomes (osteoarthritis encounter and appendicitis). Poisson and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used (primary analyses), as well as overlap weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After inverse probability of treatment weighting, 1924 recurrent nephrolithiasis events occurred among the 14 456 weighted patients who used an SGLT-2 inhibitor (105.3 per 1000 person years), compared with 853 events among the 5877 weighted patients who used a GLP-1 receptor agonist (156.4 per 1000 person years). The adjusted rate ratio was 0.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.79) and rate difference was -51 (95% CI -63 to -40) per 1000 person years, with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 20. Among those with recently active nephrolithiasis, the absolute rate difference was 219 per 1000 person years (NNT of 5). Protective associations persisted for nephrolithiasis events that required emergency department visits, hospital admissions, or procedures, and when an SGLT-2 inhibitor was compared with a DPP-4 inhibitor (rate ratio 0.73 (0.68 to 0.78), rate difference -38 (-46 to -29) per 1000 person years (NNT of 26)). Protective associations also persisted among patients with nephrolithiasis and concomitant gout, with a rate ratio of 0.67 (0.57 to 0.79) and rate difference of -53 (95% CI -78 to -27) per 1000 person years versus a GLP-1 receptor agonist (NNT of 19), and 0.63 (0.55 to 0.72) and-62 (-81 to -42) per 1000 person years, respectively, versus a DPP-4 inhibitor (NNT of 16). Furthermore, SGLT-2 inhibitor use was associated with a lower rate of gout flare-ups (rate ratio 0.72, 0.54 to 0.95, rate difference -16, -31 to -1 per 1000 person years) compared with GLP-1 receptor agonists (0.65, 0.52 to 0.82, and -21, -33 to -9 per 1000 person years) compared with DPP-4 inhibitors. SGLT-2 inhibitor initiators showed higher risk of genital infection (eg, hazard ratio 2.21, 95% CI 1.68 to 2.90, and rate difference 13 per 1000 person years), but no altered risk of osteoarthritis encounter (0.87, 0.68 to 1.1, and -2 per 1000 person years) or appendicitis (1.07, 0.69 to 1.67, and 1 per 1000 person years). Results were similar when propensity score overlap weighting was applied.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The benefits associated with SGLT-2 inhibitor for patients with nephrolithiasis in these target trial emulations suggest they may be a useful addition to current treatments to simultaneously manage nephrolithiasis recurrence and comorbidities, including gout.</p>","PeriodicalId":9201,"journal":{"name":"BMJ : British Medical Journal","volume":"387 ","pages":"e080035"},"PeriodicalIF":105.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ : British Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-080035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To emulate target trials comparing recurrence of nephrolithiasis among patients with pre-existing nephrolithiasis (overall and stratified by concomitant gout) initiating sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors versus an active comparator.

Design: Target trial emulation studies.

Setting: Canadian population database, January 2014 to June 2022.

Participants: 20 146 patients with nephrolithiasis and type 2 diabetes, including those with concomitant gout at baseline, a high risk group.

Interventions: Initiation of an SGLT-2 inhibitor or glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, with a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor as alternative comparator.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was recurrent nephrolithiasis events ascertained from diagnoses during emergency department visits, hospital admissions, or outpatient visits. Secondary outcomes included nephrolithiasis resulting in hospital admission or emergency department visits and flare-up of gout, as well as a positive control outcome (genital infection) and negative control outcomes (osteoarthritis encounter and appendicitis). Poisson and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used (primary analyses), as well as overlap weighting.

Results: After inverse probability of treatment weighting, 1924 recurrent nephrolithiasis events occurred among the 14 456 weighted patients who used an SGLT-2 inhibitor (105.3 per 1000 person years), compared with 853 events among the 5877 weighted patients who used a GLP-1 receptor agonist (156.4 per 1000 person years). The adjusted rate ratio was 0.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.79) and rate difference was -51 (95% CI -63 to -40) per 1000 person years, with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 20. Among those with recently active nephrolithiasis, the absolute rate difference was 219 per 1000 person years (NNT of 5). Protective associations persisted for nephrolithiasis events that required emergency department visits, hospital admissions, or procedures, and when an SGLT-2 inhibitor was compared with a DPP-4 inhibitor (rate ratio 0.73 (0.68 to 0.78), rate difference -38 (-46 to -29) per 1000 person years (NNT of 26)). Protective associations also persisted among patients with nephrolithiasis and concomitant gout, with a rate ratio of 0.67 (0.57 to 0.79) and rate difference of -53 (95% CI -78 to -27) per 1000 person years versus a GLP-1 receptor agonist (NNT of 19), and 0.63 (0.55 to 0.72) and-62 (-81 to -42) per 1000 person years, respectively, versus a DPP-4 inhibitor (NNT of 16). Furthermore, SGLT-2 inhibitor use was associated with a lower rate of gout flare-ups (rate ratio 0.72, 0.54 to 0.95, rate difference -16, -31 to -1 per 1000 person years) compared with GLP-1 receptor agonists (0.65, 0.52 to 0.82, and -21, -33 to -9 per 1000 person years) compared with DPP-4 inhibitors. SGLT-2 inhibitor initiators showed higher risk of genital infection (eg, hazard ratio 2.21, 95% CI 1.68 to 2.90, and rate difference 13 per 1000 person years), but no altered risk of osteoarthritis encounter (0.87, 0.68 to 1.1, and -2 per 1000 person years) or appendicitis (1.07, 0.69 to 1.67, and 1 per 1000 person years). Results were similar when propensity score overlap weighting was applied.

Conclusions: The benefits associated with SGLT-2 inhibitor for patients with nephrolithiasis in these target trial emulations suggest they may be a useful addition to current treatments to simultaneously manage nephrolithiasis recurrence and comorbidities, including gout.

钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2 抑制剂对原有肾炎或痛风患者复发性肾炎的疗效比较:目标试验模拟研究。
目标:模仿目标试验,比较已有肾炎的患者(总体和按合并痛风分层)在开始使用钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2(SGLT-2)抑制剂与活性对比剂后肾炎复发情况:设计:目标试验模拟研究:参与者:20 146 名患有肾炎和 2 型糖尿病的患者,包括基线时同时患有痛风的高危人群:干预措施:开始使用 SGLT-2 抑制剂或胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂,以二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂作为替代比较药:主要结果是根据急诊就诊、入院或门诊诊断确定的复发性肾结石事件。次要结局包括导致入院或急诊就诊的肾结石、痛风复发、阳性对照结局(生殖器感染)和阴性对照结局(骨关节炎和阑尾炎)。采用泊松和考克斯比例危险回归模型(主要分析)以及重叠加权法进行分析:经过治疗反概率加权后,使用SGLT-2抑制剂的14 456名加权患者中发生了1924例复发性肾炎事件(每1000人年105.3例),而使用GLP-1受体激动剂的5877名加权患者中发生了853例复发性肾炎事件(每1000人年156.4例)。调整后的比率比为 0.67(95% 置信区间 (CI) 0.57 至 0.79),比率差为每千人年-51(95% CI -63 至 -40),治疗所需人数 (NNT) 为 20。在近期活动性肾结石患者中,绝对比率差异为每千人年 219 例(NNT 为 5)。对于需要到急诊科就诊、入院或接受手术的肾炎事件,以及将 SGLT-2 抑制剂与 DPP-4 抑制剂进行比较时,仍存在保护性关联(比率比为 0.73(0.68 至 0.78),比率差异为每千人年-38(-46 至-29)(NNT 为 26))。与 GLP-1 受体激动剂相比,每千人年的比率比为 0.67(0.57 至 0.79),比率差为 -53(95% CI -78 至 -27)(NNT 为 19);与 DPP-4 抑制剂相比,每千人年的比率比为 0.63(0.55 至 0.72),比率差为 -62(-81 至 -42)(NNT 为 16)。此外,与 GLP-1 受体激动剂相比,与 DPP-4 抑制剂相比,使用 SGLT-2 抑制剂的痛风复发率较低(比率比为 0.72,0.54 至 0.95,比率差为-16,-31 至-1/1000 人年)(比率比为 0.65,0.52 至 0.82,比率差为-21,-33 至-9/1000 人年)。SGLT-2抑制剂启动者患生殖器感染的风险较高(例如,危险比为2.21,95% CI为1.68至2.90,比率差为13/1000人年),但患骨关节炎(0.87,0.68至1.1,-2/1000人年)或阑尾炎(1.07,0.69至1.67,1/1000人年)的风险没有改变。采用倾向得分重叠加权法时,结果相似:在这些目标试验仿真中,SGLT-2 抑制剂对肾炎患者的益处表明,它们可能是对现有治疗方法的有益补充,可同时控制肾炎复发和合并症,包括痛风。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ : British Medical Journal
BMJ : British Medical Journal Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
19.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
2997
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The BMJ (British Medical Journal) is an international peer-reviewed medical journal with a "continuous publication" model, where articles are published on bmj.com before appearing in the print journal. The website is updated daily with the latest original research, education, news, and comment articles, along with podcasts, videos, and blogs. The BMJ's editorial team is primarily located in London, with additional editors in Europe, the US, and India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信