Running therapy or antidepressants as treatments for immunometabolic depression in patients with depressive and anxiety disorders: A secondary analysis of the MOTAR study.
Sarah R Vreijling, Brenda W J H Penninx, Josine E Verhoeven, Charlotte E Teunissen, Elena R Blujdea, Aartjan T F Beekman, Femke Lamers, Rick Jansen
{"title":"Running therapy or antidepressants as treatments for immunometabolic depression in patients with depressive and anxiety disorders: A secondary analysis of the MOTAR study.","authors":"Sarah R Vreijling, Brenda W J H Penninx, Josine E Verhoeven, Charlotte E Teunissen, Elena R Blujdea, Aartjan T F Beekman, Femke Lamers, Rick Jansen","doi":"10.1016/j.bbi.2024.10.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise promotes immunometabolic health and is increasingly recognized as an effective depression treatment. Exercise may be beneficial for patients with immunometabolic depression (IMD), who experience inflammatory and metabolic dysregulations and may respond less to antidepressants. This secondary analysis of the MOTAR study compared the effects of running therapy and antidepressants on IMD features among patients with depression and/or anxiety disorder. We additionally assessed whether baseline IMD moderated intervention effects on depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants received 16 weeks of group-based running therapy (N = 96) or escitalopram/sertraline (N = 45) in a partially randomized patient preference design. IMD features included atypical, energy-related symptom (AES) severity, inflammation index (CRP, IFN-γ, IL-6, TNF-α), metabolic syndrome index, three metabolite principle components (PC) (derived from 73 metabolites) and a composite IMD index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interventions differed in changes in the metabolic syndrome index (d = 0.59, p = 0.026) and IMD index (d = 0.85, p < 0.001). While running therapy decreased both outcomes, the antidepressant group showed an increased IMD index. Although groups did not differ statistically significant in changes in AES severity, inflammation index, and metabolite PC1, results indicated a consistent trend towards greater improvement with running therapy across these outcomes as well (d = 0.38 to 0.52). Baseline IMD did not moderate intervention effects on depression outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that exercise more effectively targets the IMD dimension than antidepressants. Patients with IMD did not benefit more from running therapy than antidepressants in terms of reductions in depression. Exercise should be considered an alternative or complementary treatment to particularly reduce IMD features in depressed patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Trialregister.nl Number of identification: NTR3460.</p>","PeriodicalId":9199,"journal":{"name":"Brain, Behavior, and Immunity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain, Behavior, and Immunity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2024.10.033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Exercise promotes immunometabolic health and is increasingly recognized as an effective depression treatment. Exercise may be beneficial for patients with immunometabolic depression (IMD), who experience inflammatory and metabolic dysregulations and may respond less to antidepressants. This secondary analysis of the MOTAR study compared the effects of running therapy and antidepressants on IMD features among patients with depression and/or anxiety disorder. We additionally assessed whether baseline IMD moderated intervention effects on depression.
Methods: Participants received 16 weeks of group-based running therapy (N = 96) or escitalopram/sertraline (N = 45) in a partially randomized patient preference design. IMD features included atypical, energy-related symptom (AES) severity, inflammation index (CRP, IFN-γ, IL-6, TNF-α), metabolic syndrome index, three metabolite principle components (PC) (derived from 73 metabolites) and a composite IMD index.
Results: Interventions differed in changes in the metabolic syndrome index (d = 0.59, p = 0.026) and IMD index (d = 0.85, p < 0.001). While running therapy decreased both outcomes, the antidepressant group showed an increased IMD index. Although groups did not differ statistically significant in changes in AES severity, inflammation index, and metabolite PC1, results indicated a consistent trend towards greater improvement with running therapy across these outcomes as well (d = 0.38 to 0.52). Baseline IMD did not moderate intervention effects on depression outcomes.
Conclusions: This study suggests that exercise more effectively targets the IMD dimension than antidepressants. Patients with IMD did not benefit more from running therapy than antidepressants in terms of reductions in depression. Exercise should be considered an alternative or complementary treatment to particularly reduce IMD features in depressed patients.
Trial registration: Trialregister.nl Number of identification: NTR3460.
期刊介绍:
Established in 1987, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity proudly serves as the official journal of the Psychoneuroimmunology Research Society (PNIRS). This pioneering journal is dedicated to publishing peer-reviewed basic, experimental, and clinical studies that explore the intricate interactions among behavioral, neural, endocrine, and immune systems in both humans and animals.
As an international and interdisciplinary platform, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity focuses on original research spanning neuroscience, immunology, integrative physiology, behavioral biology, psychiatry, psychology, and clinical medicine. The journal is inclusive of research conducted at various levels, including molecular, cellular, social, and whole organism perspectives. With a commitment to efficiency, the journal facilitates online submission and review, ensuring timely publication of experimental results. Manuscripts typically undergo peer review and are returned to authors within 30 days of submission. It's worth noting that Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, published eight times a year, does not impose submission fees or page charges, fostering an open and accessible platform for scientific discourse.