A pilot study of AI-assisted reading of prostate MRI in Organized Prostate Cancer Testing.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Erik Thimansson, Sophia Zackrisson, Fredrik Jäderling, Max Alterbeck, Thomas Jiborn, Anders Bjartell, Jonas Wallström
{"title":"A pilot study of AI-assisted reading of prostate MRI in Organized Prostate Cancer Testing.","authors":"Erik Thimansson, Sophia Zackrisson, Fredrik Jäderling, Max Alterbeck, Thomas Jiborn, Anders Bjartell, Jonas Wallström","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of AI-assisted reading of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in Organized Prostate cancer Testing (OPT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study including 57 men with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels ≥3 µg/L that performed bi-parametric MRI in OPT. The results of a CE-marked deep learning (DL) algorithm for prostate MRI lesion detection were compared with assessments performed by on-site radiologists and reference radiologists. Per patient PI-RADS (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System)/Likert scores were cross-tabulated and compared with biopsy outcomes, if performed. Positive MRI was defined as PI-RADS/Likert ≥4. Reader variability was assessed with weighted kappa scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of positive MRIs was 13 (23%), 8 (14%), and 29 (51%) for the local radiologists, expert consensus, and DL, respectively. Kappa scores were moderate for local radiologists versus expert consensus 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.74), slight for local radiologists versus DL 0.12 (95% CI: -0.07 to 0.32), and slight for expert consensus versus DL 0.17 (95% CI: -0.01 to 0.35). Out of 10 cases with biopsy proven prostate cancer with Gleason ≥3+4 the DL scored 7 as Likert ≥4.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The Dl-algorithm showed low agreement with both local and expert radiologists. Training and validation of DL-algorithms in specific screening cohorts is essential before introduction in organized testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"63 ","pages":"816-821"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40475","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of AI-assisted reading of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in Organized Prostate cancer Testing (OPT).

Methods: Retrospective cohort study including 57 men with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels ≥3 µg/L that performed bi-parametric MRI in OPT. The results of a CE-marked deep learning (DL) algorithm for prostate MRI lesion detection were compared with assessments performed by on-site radiologists and reference radiologists. Per patient PI-RADS (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System)/Likert scores were cross-tabulated and compared with biopsy outcomes, if performed. Positive MRI was defined as PI-RADS/Likert ≥4. Reader variability was assessed with weighted kappa scores.

Results: The number of positive MRIs was 13 (23%), 8 (14%), and 29 (51%) for the local radiologists, expert consensus, and DL, respectively. Kappa scores were moderate for local radiologists versus expert consensus 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.74), slight for local radiologists versus DL 0.12 (95% CI: -0.07 to 0.32), and slight for expert consensus versus DL 0.17 (95% CI: -0.01 to 0.35). Out of 10 cases with biopsy proven prostate cancer with Gleason ≥3+4 the DL scored 7 as Likert ≥4.

Interpretation: The Dl-algorithm showed low agreement with both local and expert radiologists. Training and validation of DL-algorithms in specific screening cohorts is essential before introduction in organized testing.

在有组织的前列腺癌检测中进行人工智能辅助读取前列腺 MRI 的试点研究。
目的评估前列腺磁共振成像(MRI)人工智能辅助读片在前列腺癌组织化检测(OPT)中的可行性:回顾性队列研究,包括57名前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平升高≥3 µg/L的男性,他们在OPT中进行了双参数磁共振成像。将 CE 标记的深度学习 (DL) 算法的前列腺 MRI 病灶检测结果与现场放射科医生和参考放射科医生的评估结果进行了比较。对每位患者的 PI-RADS(前列腺成像报告和数据系统)/Likert 分数进行交叉分析,并与活检结果(如果进行了活检)进行比较。PI-RADS/Likert≥4为MRI阳性。用加权卡帕评分评估读者的差异性:当地放射科医生、专家共识和 DL 的 MRI 阳性数量分别为 13 例(23%)、8 例(14%)和 29 例(51%)。当地放射科医生与专家共识的 Kappa 评分为中度 0.55(95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.37-0.74),当地放射科医生与 DL 的 Kappa 评分为轻度 0.12(95% CI:-0.07-0.32),专家共识与 DL 的 Kappa 评分为轻度 0.17(95% CI:-0.01-0.35)。在 10 例经活检证实的前列腺癌患者中,Gleason ≥3+4 的 DL 得分为 7,Likert ≥4.Interpretation:DL算法与当地和放射科专家的一致性较低。在将 DL 算法引入有组织的测试之前,有必要在特定的筛查人群中对其进行培训和验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信