Patient controlled epidural analgesia during labor: Protocol for a scoping review.

IF 1.9 4区医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1111/aas.14548

Magnus Grønbæk Henriksen, Nikoline Svensson, Ann Merete Møller

{"title":"Patient controlled epidural analgesia during labor: Protocol for a scoping review.","authors":"Magnus Grønbæk Henriksen, Nikoline Svensson, Ann Merete Møller","doi":"10.1111/aas.14548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Childbirth remains one of the most painful experiences for women. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia provides the women in labor with self-control and thereby a shorter time interval between onset of pain and administration of analgesia, thus potentially improving the childbirth experience. This scoping review aims to investigate PCEA during labor involving maternal satisfaction, risks of adverse effects and obstetric interventions by mapping the evidence and identifying gaps in the current evidence base.Methods: The forthcoming review will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A systematic search will be carried out across major peer-reviewed databases and gray literature will be sought. All study types involving women in labor receiving PCEA will be eligible for inclusion. The extracted data will be charted regarding trial characteristics, population/participation characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and key findings.Results: The results will be presented through relevant tables, figures, and graphs when appropriate. Alongside this, we present the data descriptively to explain how the results align with the objectives of the review.Conclusion: PCEA offers women greater autonomy during childbirth, making it essential to examine its effects and potential risks. By mapping current evidence regarding PCEA, this review aims to identify knowledge gaps and provide insights to enhance maternal care and improve childbirth experiences.","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":"e14548"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Childbirth remains one of the most painful experiences for women. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia provides the women in labor with self-control and thereby a shorter time interval between onset of pain and administration of analgesia, thus potentially improving the childbirth experience. This scoping review aims to investigate PCEA during labor involving maternal satisfaction, risks of adverse effects and obstetric interventions by mapping the evidence and identifying gaps in the current evidence base.

Methods: The forthcoming review will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A systematic search will be carried out across major peer-reviewed databases and gray literature will be sought. All study types involving women in labor receiving PCEA will be eligible for inclusion. The extracted data will be charted regarding trial characteristics, population/participation characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and key findings.

Results: The results will be presented through relevant tables, figures, and graphs when appropriate. Alongside this, we present the data descriptively to explain how the results align with the objectives of the review.

Conclusion: PCEA offers women greater autonomy during childbirth, making it essential to examine its effects and potential risks. By mapping current evidence regarding PCEA, this review aims to identify knowledge gaps and provide insights to enhance maternal care and improve childbirth experiences.

查看原文本刊更多论文

分娩过程中的患者自控硬膜外镇痛：范围界定审查协议。

背景：分娩仍然是妇女最痛苦的经历之一。患者自控硬膜外镇痛为产妇提供了自我控制能力，从而缩短了疼痛发作与镇痛给药之间的时间间隔，因此有可能改善分娩体验。本次范围界定综述旨在通过绘制证据图并找出当前证据库中的不足之处，调查分娩过程中的 PCEA 在产妇满意度、不良反应风险和产科干预方面的作用：即将开展的综述将遵守《系统综述和荟萃分析扩展至范围界定综述的首选报告项目》（PRISMA-ScR）和 JBI 范围界定综述方法。我们将在主要的同行评议数据库中进行系统检索，并寻找灰色文献。所有涉及接受 PCEA 的产妇的研究类型均可纳入。提取的数据将以图表形式列出试验特征、人群/参与特征、干预措施、结果和主要结论：结果：在适当的时候，我们将通过相关的表格、数字和图表来展示结果。同时，我们还将以描述性的方式呈现数据，以解释结果如何与综述目标相一致：PCEA 为妇女在分娩过程中提供了更大的自主权，因此研究其效果和潜在风险至关重要。本综述旨在通过对有关 PCEA 的现有证据进行分析，找出知识差距，为加强孕产妇护理和改善分娩体验提供真知灼见。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 医学-麻醉学

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

9.50%

发文量

157

审稿时长

3-8 weeks

期刊介绍： Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.