Slađana Radinović, Hans A. Winther, Seshadri Nadathur, Will J. Percival, Enrique Paillas, Tristan Sohrab Fraser, Elena Massara, Alex Woodfinden
{"title":"Alcock–Paczyński effect on void-finding","authors":"Slađana Radinović, Hans A. Winther, Seshadri Nadathur, Will J. Percival, Enrique Paillas, Tristan Sohrab Fraser, Elena Massara, Alex Woodfinden","doi":"10.1051/0004-6361/202451358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Under the assumption of statistical isotropy, and in the absence of directional selection effects, a stack of voids is expected to be spherically symmetric, which makes it an excellent object to use for an Alcock–Paczyński (AP) test. This test is commonly carried out using the void-galaxy cross-correlation function (CCF), which has emerged as a competitive probe, especially in combination with the galaxy-galaxy auto-correlation function. Current studies of the AP effect around voids assume that void-centre positions are influenced by the choice of fiducial cosmology in the same way as galaxy positions. We show that this assumption, though prevalent in the literature, is complicated by the response of void-finding algorithms to shifts in tracer positions. Using stretched simulation boxes to emulate the AP effect, we investigate how the void-galaxy CCF changes due to its presence, revealing an additional effect imprinted in the CCF that must be accounted for. The effect originates from the response of void finders to the distorted tracer field – which leads to reduction of the amplitude of the AP signal in the CCF – and thus depends on the specific void-finding algorithm used. We present results for four different void-finding packages, namely REVOLVER, VIDE, voxel, and the spherical void finder in the Pylians3 library, demonstrating how incorrect treatment of the AP effect results in biases in the recovered parameters, regardless of the technique used. Finally, we propose a method to alleviate this issue without resorting to complex and finder-specific modelling of the void-finder response to AP.","PeriodicalId":8571,"journal":{"name":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451358","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Under the assumption of statistical isotropy, and in the absence of directional selection effects, a stack of voids is expected to be spherically symmetric, which makes it an excellent object to use for an Alcock–Paczyński (AP) test. This test is commonly carried out using the void-galaxy cross-correlation function (CCF), which has emerged as a competitive probe, especially in combination with the galaxy-galaxy auto-correlation function. Current studies of the AP effect around voids assume that void-centre positions are influenced by the choice of fiducial cosmology in the same way as galaxy positions. We show that this assumption, though prevalent in the literature, is complicated by the response of void-finding algorithms to shifts in tracer positions. Using stretched simulation boxes to emulate the AP effect, we investigate how the void-galaxy CCF changes due to its presence, revealing an additional effect imprinted in the CCF that must be accounted for. The effect originates from the response of void finders to the distorted tracer field – which leads to reduction of the amplitude of the AP signal in the CCF – and thus depends on the specific void-finding algorithm used. We present results for four different void-finding packages, namely REVOLVER, VIDE, voxel, and the spherical void finder in the Pylians3 library, demonstrating how incorrect treatment of the AP effect results in biases in the recovered parameters, regardless of the technique used. Finally, we propose a method to alleviate this issue without resorting to complex and finder-specific modelling of the void-finder response to AP.
在统计各向同性的假设下,在没有方向选择效应的情况下,一堆空洞预计是球对称的,这使它成为阿尔科克-帕钦斯基(AP)检验的极好对象。这种测试通常使用空隙-星系交叉相关函数(CCF)来进行,CCF 已成为一种有竞争力的探测器,尤其是与星系-星系自相关函数结合使用时。目前对空洞周围 AP 效应的研究假定,空洞中心位置与星系位置一样受基准宇宙学选择的影响。我们的研究表明,这种假设虽然在文献中很普遍,但由于空洞寻找算法对示踪剂位置移动的反应而变得复杂。我们利用拉伸模拟盒来模拟AP效应,研究了空洞-星系CCF如何因AP效应的存在而发生变化,揭示了CCF中必须考虑的额外效应。这种效应源于虚空探测仪对扭曲示踪场的响应--这会导致 CCF 中 AP 信号振幅的减小--因此取决于所使用的特定虚空探测算法。我们展示了 REVOLVER、VIDE、voxel 和 Pylians3 库中的球形空隙寻找器这四种不同空隙寻找软件包的结果,证明了无论使用哪种技术,对 AP 效应的不正确处理都会导致恢复的参数出现偏差。最后,我们提出了一种方法来缓解这一问题,而无需诉诸复杂和特定的空洞探测仪对 AP 的响应建模。
期刊介绍:
Astronomy & Astrophysics is an international Journal that publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysics (theoretical, observational, and instrumental) independently of the techniques used to obtain the results.