H Karpatkin , E Cohen , J Rachwani , Z Amster , E Giovine , G Bonilla
{"title":"High Intensity Interval Gait Training vs Moderate Intensity Continuous Gait training in Multiple Sclerosis: Impact on gait and balance","authors":"H Karpatkin , E Cohen , J Rachwani , Z Amster , E Giovine , G Bonilla","doi":"10.1016/j.msard.2024.105929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><div>High Intensity Interval Gait Training (HIIGT) has been shown to improve walking performance in neurologic conditions such as stroke but its impact on Multiple Sclerosis (MS) has not been well examined. The current standard of care for gait training for persons with MS (pwMS) is Moderate Intensity Continuous Gait Training (MICGT). The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of HIIGT to MICGT on gait and balance performance in pwMS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ambulatory pwMS were randomized into either a HIIGT or a MICGT condition. Participants in the HIIGT condition alternated 30 seconds of maximum effort fast walking with one minute of seated rest for 25 minutes. The MICGT group walked for 20 continuous minutes at a comfortable pace. Training was performed twice a week for 6 weeks. Primary outcome measures are the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>To date 12 subjects (7 male, age 54.2, EDSS 3.4) have completed the study. 6MWT distances improved from 413 to 507 meters in the HIIGT group and from 445 to 473m in the MICGT group (MDC=88 meters). The HIIGT improved in FGA from 16.7 to 23.0 while the MICGT improved from 17.8 to 19.2.(MDC=6). Data collection is currently ongoing and is expected to conclude by 12/25. No adverse events were reported by either group.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Both groups improved but the MDC for both primary outcome measures was only exceeded in the HIIGT group. Despite concerns about fatigue common in MS, the HIIGT sessions were well tolerated. Although the training was not specific to balance, subjects who underwent HIIGT improved balance performance, suggesting that the impact of HIIGT may extend beyond walking. These finding suggests that HIIGT may be a more effective physical therapy intervention for pwMS than the current standard of care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18958,"journal":{"name":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211034824005054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Purpose
High Intensity Interval Gait Training (HIIGT) has been shown to improve walking performance in neurologic conditions such as stroke but its impact on Multiple Sclerosis (MS) has not been well examined. The current standard of care for gait training for persons with MS (pwMS) is Moderate Intensity Continuous Gait Training (MICGT). The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of HIIGT to MICGT on gait and balance performance in pwMS.
Methods
Ambulatory pwMS were randomized into either a HIIGT or a MICGT condition. Participants in the HIIGT condition alternated 30 seconds of maximum effort fast walking with one minute of seated rest for 25 minutes. The MICGT group walked for 20 continuous minutes at a comfortable pace. Training was performed twice a week for 6 weeks. Primary outcome measures are the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA).
Results
To date 12 subjects (7 male, age 54.2, EDSS 3.4) have completed the study. 6MWT distances improved from 413 to 507 meters in the HIIGT group and from 445 to 473m in the MICGT group (MDC=88 meters). The HIIGT improved in FGA from 16.7 to 23.0 while the MICGT improved from 17.8 to 19.2.(MDC=6). Data collection is currently ongoing and is expected to conclude by 12/25. No adverse events were reported by either group.
Discussion
Both groups improved but the MDC for both primary outcome measures was only exceeded in the HIIGT group. Despite concerns about fatigue common in MS, the HIIGT sessions were well tolerated. Although the training was not specific to balance, subjects who underwent HIIGT improved balance performance, suggesting that the impact of HIIGT may extend beyond walking. These finding suggests that HIIGT may be a more effective physical therapy intervention for pwMS than the current standard of care.
期刊介绍:
Multiple Sclerosis is an area of ever expanding research and escalating publications. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders is a wide ranging international journal supported by key researchers from all neuroscience domains that focus on MS and associated disease of the central nervous system. The primary aim of this new journal is the rapid publication of high quality original research in the field. Important secondary aims will be timely updates and editorials on important scientific and clinical care advances, controversies in the field, and invited opinion articles from current thought leaders on topical issues. One section of the journal will focus on teaching, written to enhance the practice of community and academic neurologists involved in the care of MS patients. Summaries of key articles written for a lay audience will be provided as an on-line resource.
A team of four chief editors is supported by leading section editors who will commission and appraise original and review articles concerning: clinical neurology, neuroimaging, neuropathology, neuroepidemiology, therapeutics, genetics / transcriptomics, experimental models, neuroimmunology, biomarkers, neuropsychology, neurorehabilitation, measurement scales, teaching, neuroethics and lay communication.