Dynamic anterior stabilization of the shoulder using buttons

Q2 Medicine
José Carlos Garcia Jr MD, PhD, Cindy Yukie Nakano Schincariol MD, Ricardo Berriel Mendes MD, Paulo Cavalcante Muzy MD
{"title":"Dynamic anterior stabilization of the shoulder using buttons","authors":"José Carlos Garcia Jr MD, PhD,&nbsp;Cindy Yukie Nakano Schincariol MD,&nbsp;Ricardo Berriel Mendes MD,&nbsp;Paulo Cavalcante Muzy MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.06.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Surgical procedures to treat anterior shoulder instability are essentially divided into those for significant bone loss and those without relevant bone loss. However, there is a gray area between these procedures that would not require bone grafting but would benefit from improved stabilization mechanisms. This study evaluates a technique based on the triple soft tissue block, the dynamic anterior stabilization of the shoulder, using an adjustable button.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty patients that underwent surgical procedure from September 2017 to March 2022 were prospectively evaluated. All were assessed with University of California-Los Angeles, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, and measurement of external rotation of the shoulder before and 24 or more months after surgery, and the Rowe score at least 24 months postsurgery. The Rowe score was compared to the standard of 90, bone loss was also measured.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean University of California-Los Angeles score changed from 25.60 ± 2.83 before surgery to 34.60 ± 0.82 postsurgery <em>P</em> &lt; .01; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons from 84.99 ± 8.94 before surgery to 97.34 ± 4.39 postsurgery <em>P</em> &lt; .01; Rowe with an average of 98.00 ± 2.99 compared to the standard 90 of excellent results <em>P</em> &lt; .01. The average loss of lateral rotation was 2.25° ± 2.55 (0°-5°), and the average bone loss in patients was 8% ± 2.48% (0%-20%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The proposed procedure demonstrated safety and effectiveness in treating recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324001646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Surgical procedures to treat anterior shoulder instability are essentially divided into those for significant bone loss and those without relevant bone loss. However, there is a gray area between these procedures that would not require bone grafting but would benefit from improved stabilization mechanisms. This study evaluates a technique based on the triple soft tissue block, the dynamic anterior stabilization of the shoulder, using an adjustable button.

Methods

Twenty patients that underwent surgical procedure from September 2017 to March 2022 were prospectively evaluated. All were assessed with University of California-Los Angeles, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, and measurement of external rotation of the shoulder before and 24 or more months after surgery, and the Rowe score at least 24 months postsurgery. The Rowe score was compared to the standard of 90, bone loss was also measured.

Results

The mean University of California-Los Angeles score changed from 25.60 ± 2.83 before surgery to 34.60 ± 0.82 postsurgery P < .01; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons from 84.99 ± 8.94 before surgery to 97.34 ± 4.39 postsurgery P < .01; Rowe with an average of 98.00 ± 2.99 compared to the standard 90 of excellent results P < .01. The average loss of lateral rotation was 2.25° ± 2.55 (0°-5°), and the average bone loss in patients was 8% ± 2.48% (0%-20%).

Conclusion

The proposed procedure demonstrated safety and effectiveness in treating recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability.
使用纽扣动态稳定肩关节前部
背景治疗肩关节前侧不稳定的手术方法主要分为骨质严重流失和无相关骨质流失两种。然而,在这两种手术之间存在一个灰色地带,即不需要植骨,但可以从改进的稳定机制中获益。本研究评估了一种基于三重软组织阻滞的技术,即使用可调节按钮的肩关节动态前方稳定技术。方法对 2017 年 9 月至 2022 年 3 月期间接受手术治疗的 20 例患者进行了前瞻性评估。所有患者均接受了加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校、美国肩肘外科医生评分、术前和术后24个月或更长时间的肩关节外旋测量,以及术后至少24个月的Rowe评分。结果加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校的平均得分从术前的 25.60 ± 2.83 分变为术后的 34.60 ± 0.82 分 P < .01; 美国肩肘外科医生的平均得分从术前的 84.99 ± 8.94 分变为术后的 97.34 ± 4.39 分 P < .01; Rowe 的平均得分从 98.00 ± 2.99 分变为术后的 98.00 ± 2.99 分 P < .01.患者的平均侧旋损失为 2.25° ± 2.55(0°-5°),平均骨量损失为 8% ± 2.48%(0%-20%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信