Fifteen-Year Experience of a Single Institution: Outcomes for Early-Stage Hodgkins Lymphoma Comparing Chemotherapy Alone Versus Combined Modality Therapy
Joshua Y. Qian MD , Radhesh Amin BS , Humzah Ali BS , Yichun Cao MPH , Jeffrey M. Switchenko PhD , Arif S. Rashid MD , Pamela B. Allen MD , Sheela Hanasoge MBBS, PhD , Mohammad K. Khan MD, PhD
{"title":"Fifteen-Year Experience of a Single Institution: Outcomes for Early-Stage Hodgkins Lymphoma Comparing Chemotherapy Alone Versus Combined Modality Therapy","authors":"Joshua Y. Qian MD , Radhesh Amin BS , Humzah Ali BS , Yichun Cao MPH , Jeffrey M. Switchenko PhD , Arif S. Rashid MD , Pamela B. Allen MD , Sheela Hanasoge MBBS, PhD , Mohammad K. Khan MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy is the current standard treatment for early-stage Hodgkins lymphoma (HL). The use of consolidative radiation therapy (RT) in addition to chemotherapy may lead to better survival rates but is controversial because of concerns about long-term toxicity. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes of patients receiving ABVD chemotherapy alone (CTX alone) versus ABVD with consolidative RT (CMT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>A single-institution, retrospective review of patients with HL diagnosed from 2000 to 2014 was conducted. Patients were identified from the National Cancer Database. Inclusion criteria included patients aged ≥18 years, with stage I or II HL, who received ABVD with a complete response with/without CMT. Consolidative RT must have been started within 90 days of completing chemotherapy. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Follow-up details and treatment responses were collected from medical record reviews. Standard statistical analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate relapse-free survival (RFS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred and 8 patients with early-stage HL were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 31 years (range, 19-72). Most patients were female (63%) and Caucasian (65%). stage II HL was present in 89%of patients, 89% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0 or 1, 35% had B symptoms, and 9% had extranodal involvement. A total of 52.8% received CMT (<em>n</em> = 57) and 47.2% received CTX alone (<em>n</em> = 51). The CMT group had fewer cycles of chemotherapy compared to the CTX-alone group (mean cycles, 5.2 vs 5.7, <em>P</em> = 0.045). Twenty-four relapse events occurred in the CTX-alone group, while no relapse events occurred in the CMT group. RFS at 10 years was significantly improved in the CMT group (100%) compared to CTX alone (47.4%, <em>P</em> < .0001; HR = .03, <em>P</em> < .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ABVD with consolidative RT was associated with improved RFS. Further studies of toxicity comparisons, advanced stages, and nonfavorable HL are warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 12","pages":"Article 101636"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy is the current standard treatment for early-stage Hodgkins lymphoma (HL). The use of consolidative radiation therapy (RT) in addition to chemotherapy may lead to better survival rates but is controversial because of concerns about long-term toxicity. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes of patients receiving ABVD chemotherapy alone (CTX alone) versus ABVD with consolidative RT (CMT).
Methods and Materials
A single-institution, retrospective review of patients with HL diagnosed from 2000 to 2014 was conducted. Patients were identified from the National Cancer Database. Inclusion criteria included patients aged ≥18 years, with stage I or II HL, who received ABVD with a complete response with/without CMT. Consolidative RT must have been started within 90 days of completing chemotherapy. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Follow-up details and treatment responses were collected from medical record reviews. Standard statistical analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate relapse-free survival (RFS).
Results
One hundred and 8 patients with early-stage HL were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 31 years (range, 19-72). Most patients were female (63%) and Caucasian (65%). stage II HL was present in 89%of patients, 89% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0 or 1, 35% had B symptoms, and 9% had extranodal involvement. A total of 52.8% received CMT (n = 57) and 47.2% received CTX alone (n = 51). The CMT group had fewer cycles of chemotherapy compared to the CTX-alone group (mean cycles, 5.2 vs 5.7, P = 0.045). Twenty-four relapse events occurred in the CTX-alone group, while no relapse events occurred in the CMT group. RFS at 10 years was significantly improved in the CMT group (100%) compared to CTX alone (47.4%, P < .0001; HR = .03, P < .001).
Conclusions
ABVD with consolidative RT was associated with improved RFS. Further studies of toxicity comparisons, advanced stages, and nonfavorable HL are warranted.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.