Navigating battery choices: A comparative study of lithium iron phosphate and nickel manganese cobalt battery technologies

Solomon Evro, Abdurahman Ajumobi, Darrell Mayon, Olusegun Stanley Tomomewo
{"title":"Navigating battery choices: A comparative study of lithium iron phosphate and nickel manganese cobalt battery technologies","authors":"Solomon Evro,&nbsp;Abdurahman Ajumobi,&nbsp;Darrell Mayon,&nbsp;Olusegun Stanley Tomomewo","doi":"10.1016/j.fub.2024.100007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research offers a comparative study on Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) and Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) battery technologies through an extensive methodological approach that focuses on their chemical properties, performance metrics, cost efficiency, safety profiles, environmental footprints as well as innovatively comparing their market dynamics and technical performance to provide strategic recommendations and projections. Based upon an exhaustive examination into electrochemical attributes, thermal behavior, life cycle management aspects along with current trends within markets allow us to create a framework against which these most popular electricity storage alternatives might be assessed. Our results show LFP batteries are safer with life cycles beyond 2000 cycles at approximately 30 % lower costs than other similar battery technologies. They have enhanced heat resistance with the ability to operate effectively up to 60 °C besides having significantly reduced carbon footprints. On the other hand, NMC batteries have high energy densities, reaching 260 Wh/kg making them suitable for portable electronics and electric vehicles with a lot of power requirements although their costs are higher and there are environmental concerns associated with their cobalt and nickel content. The work confirms that LFP batteries are increasingly being adopted in markets due to cost advantages and safety improvements. We recognize the continued importance of NMC batteries in high performance areas due to their superior energy output ratings. LFP is recommended for applications requiring long lifetimes while NMC is ideal when high power is needed. The study indicates the need for better battery technology development towards improved efficiency and safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100560,"journal":{"name":"Future Batteries","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100007"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Batteries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950264024000078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research offers a comparative study on Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) and Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) battery technologies through an extensive methodological approach that focuses on their chemical properties, performance metrics, cost efficiency, safety profiles, environmental footprints as well as innovatively comparing their market dynamics and technical performance to provide strategic recommendations and projections. Based upon an exhaustive examination into electrochemical attributes, thermal behavior, life cycle management aspects along with current trends within markets allow us to create a framework against which these most popular electricity storage alternatives might be assessed. Our results show LFP batteries are safer with life cycles beyond 2000 cycles at approximately 30 % lower costs than other similar battery technologies. They have enhanced heat resistance with the ability to operate effectively up to 60 °C besides having significantly reduced carbon footprints. On the other hand, NMC batteries have high energy densities, reaching 260 Wh/kg making them suitable for portable electronics and electric vehicles with a lot of power requirements although their costs are higher and there are environmental concerns associated with their cobalt and nickel content. The work confirms that LFP batteries are increasingly being adopted in markets due to cost advantages and safety improvements. We recognize the continued importance of NMC batteries in high performance areas due to their superior energy output ratings. LFP is recommended for applications requiring long lifetimes while NMC is ideal when high power is needed. The study indicates the need for better battery technology development towards improved efficiency and safety.
电池选择导航:磷酸铁锂和镍锰钴电池技术比较研究
本研究通过广泛的方法论,对磷酸铁锂(LFP)和镍锰钴(NMC)电池技术进行了比较研究,重点关注它们的化学特性、性能指标、成本效率、安全性能、环境足迹,并创新性地比较了它们的市场动态和技术性能,以提供战略建议和预测。基于对电化学属性、热行为、生命周期管理方面以及当前市场趋势的详尽研究,我们创建了一个框架,并据此对这些最流行的电力存储替代品进行评估。我们的研究结果表明,LFP 电池更安全,使用寿命超过 2000 次,成本比其他类似电池技术低约 30%。它们具有更强的耐热性,能够在高达 60 °C 的温度下有效工作,而且碳足迹显著减少。另一方面,NMC 电池的能量密度高,可达 260 Wh/kg,因此适用于需要大量电力的便携式电子产品和电动汽车,但其成本较高,而且其钴和镍含量引起了环境问题。这项工作证实,由于成本优势和安全性的提高,低温多晶体电池正被越来越多的市场所采用。我们认识到,由于 NMC 电池具有卓越的额定能量输出,因此在高性能领域仍具有重要意义。在需要长寿命的应用中,建议使用全氟锂电池,而在需要高功率的应用中,NMC 电池则是理想之选。这项研究表明,需要更好地开发电池技术,以提高效率和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信