Fairness for machine learning software in education: A systematic mapping study

IF 3.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Nga Pham , Hung Pham Ngoc , Anh Nguyen-Duc
{"title":"Fairness for machine learning software in education: A systematic mapping study","authors":"Nga Pham ,&nbsp;Hung Pham Ngoc ,&nbsp;Anh Nguyen-Duc","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.112244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The integration of machine learning (ML) systems into various sectors, notably education, has great potential to transform business workflows and decision-making processes. However, this technological advancement brings forth critical ethical concerns, particularly concerning the fairness of decisions affecting diverse groups of people. Our objective was to systematically map out the landscape of ML fairness research in higher education by exploring seven key research questions. These questions span a range of topics from the types of ML algorithms used in education to the methods of fairness assessment and the results achieved in terms of equity. We included 63 primary studies published between 2002 and 2023. The most common setting for AI Fairness research are: traditional machine learning algorithms (Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Decision Tree), sensitive variables (gender, race, ethnicity), and various definitions of fairness (Group fairness, Demographic parity, Equalized odds). We also identify several future research directions, including fairness assurance for multiple sensitive variables, combining different fairness concepts and metrics, open-source benchmarking tools, and fairness testing for modern ML/AI models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Software","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 112244"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121224002887","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of machine learning (ML) systems into various sectors, notably education, has great potential to transform business workflows and decision-making processes. However, this technological advancement brings forth critical ethical concerns, particularly concerning the fairness of decisions affecting diverse groups of people. Our objective was to systematically map out the landscape of ML fairness research in higher education by exploring seven key research questions. These questions span a range of topics from the types of ML algorithms used in education to the methods of fairness assessment and the results achieved in terms of equity. We included 63 primary studies published between 2002 and 2023. The most common setting for AI Fairness research are: traditional machine learning algorithms (Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Decision Tree), sensitive variables (gender, race, ethnicity), and various definitions of fairness (Group fairness, Demographic parity, Equalized odds). We also identify several future research directions, including fairness assurance for multiple sensitive variables, combining different fairness concepts and metrics, open-source benchmarking tools, and fairness testing for modern ML/AI models.
教育领域机器学习软件的公平性:系统绘图研究
将机器学习(ML)系统集成到各行各业,特别是教育领域,具有改变业务工作流程和决策过程的巨大潜力。然而,这一技术进步也带来了重要的伦理问题,尤其是影响不同人群的决策公平性问题。我们的目标是通过探索七个关键的研究问题,系统地勾勒出高等教育中的 ML 公平性研究图景。这些问题涵盖了从教育中使用的 ML 算法类型到公平性评估方法以及在公平性方面取得的成果等一系列主题。我们收录了 2002 年至 2023 年间发表的 63 项主要研究。人工智能公平性研究最常见的背景是:传统的机器学习算法(逻辑回归、随机森林、决策树)、敏感变量(性别、种族、民族)以及各种公平性定义(群体公平性、人口统计学均等、均等赔率)。我们还确定了几个未来的研究方向,包括多个敏感变量的公平性保证、不同公平性概念和指标的结合、开源基准测试工具以及现代 ML/AI 模型的公平性测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Systems and Software
Journal of Systems and Software 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
193
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Systems and Software publishes papers covering all aspects of software engineering and related hardware-software-systems issues. All articles should include a validation of the idea presented, e.g. through case studies, experiments, or systematic comparisons with other approaches already in practice. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: •Methods and tools for, and empirical studies on, software requirements, design, architecture, verification and validation, maintenance and evolution •Agile, model-driven, service-oriented, open source and global software development •Approaches for mobile, multiprocessing, real-time, distributed, cloud-based, dependable and virtualized systems •Human factors and management concerns of software development •Data management and big data issues of software systems •Metrics and evaluation, data mining of software development resources •Business and economic aspects of software development processes The journal welcomes state-of-the-art surveys and reports of practical experience for all of these topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信