{"title":"Optimal cut-off values of the active knee extension test for diagnosing hamstring tightness","authors":"Wootaek Lim","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.10.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Active knee extension (AKE) is widely used to assess hamstring length, and an 'AKE >20°' is often used as the criterion for diagnosing tightness. However, the scientific evidence for this is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study measured and analysed AKE according to sex in two groups with different exercise participation levels to identify the appropriateness of current criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In the supine position, 90° flexion of the hip and knee joints was performed. The maximal knee extension was measured using a goniometer. Cut-off values for diagnosing hamstring tightness were calculated in three different ways as 'mean-1SD', 'mean-2SD', and 'mean-3SD'.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were significant differences in AKE between groups and between sexes. In group A, representing normal healthy adults, cut-off values defined as mean-1SD and mean-2SD were 33.5° and 19.7° in male participants and 28.0° and 15.7° in female participants, respectively. There was a weak correlation between AKE and body mass index, but not between AKE and height and between AKE and weight.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study found that the level of exercise participation significantly affects AKE, and female participants consistently had high flexibility regardless of exercise participation. Therefore, the current cut-off value, widely used in research and clinical settings, may not be a suitable criterion for diagnosing hamstring tightness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224004662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Active knee extension (AKE) is widely used to assess hamstring length, and an 'AKE >20°' is often used as the criterion for diagnosing tightness. However, the scientific evidence for this is unclear.
Objective
This study measured and analysed AKE according to sex in two groups with different exercise participation levels to identify the appropriateness of current criteria.
Methods
In the supine position, 90° flexion of the hip and knee joints was performed. The maximal knee extension was measured using a goniometer. Cut-off values for diagnosing hamstring tightness were calculated in three different ways as 'mean-1SD', 'mean-2SD', and 'mean-3SD'.
Results
There were significant differences in AKE between groups and between sexes. In group A, representing normal healthy adults, cut-off values defined as mean-1SD and mean-2SD were 33.5° and 19.7° in male participants and 28.0° and 15.7° in female participants, respectively. There was a weak correlation between AKE and body mass index, but not between AKE and height and between AKE and weight.
Conclusion
This study found that the level of exercise participation significantly affects AKE, and female participants consistently had high flexibility regardless of exercise participation. Therefore, the current cut-off value, widely used in research and clinical settings, may not be a suitable criterion for diagnosing hamstring tightness.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina