Analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis population for Surgical Site Infection Risk Factors

Abstract

Objective

The incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing surgical correction varies but is commonly reported between 0.5 and 6.7 %. The identification of modifiable risk factors is crucial to preventing these infections in the AIS population. Some potential modifiable risk factors include the use of stainless-steel implants, a larger volume of instrumentation and an increased volume of blood products transfused. However, evidence in support of these factors and others representing true risk for the development of SSI is limited and often varies. We aimed to determine the incidence of SSI in AIS undergoing primary scoliosis fusion at our hospital, and explore demographic and clinical variables in the development of SSI in AIS.

Methods

This was a case control retrospective study. Patients aged 10-19 year-old that underwent posterior spinal fusion for initial correction of AIS at our hospital between the years 2012–2020 were eligible. Patients with any previous spine surgery or spine fracture were excluded. A descriptive analysis was then performed on the data.

Results

Of the 334 patients on which data was collected, one SSI was identified resulting in an incidence of infection of 0.3 %. The largest ethnicity represented was Caucasian with 254 patients. The average age was 14.3 years with averaged follow-up of 6.6 years. The majority of patients (252) received implants composed of titanium and cobalt chrome. The average operation duration was 5 h and 7.7 min, and the average hospital stay was 4.2 days. The average amount of blood loss was 553 ml. Chlorhexidine wipes or some other antimicrobial preparation was used on 197 patients and betadine solution was used on 321.185 patients were recorded to have received either antibiotic-loaded allograft or antibiotic powder and 326 patients were recorded to have received intraoperative antibiotics.

Conclusions

The long term clinical follow up of our study and low incidence of infection provide additional evidence for the benefit of antimicrobial techniques and risk factor mitigation previously suggested in the literature for the prevention of SSI in AIS.

Level of evidence

Level III.