Comparative exploration on EEG signal filtering using window control methods

Q3 Mathematics
Aruna Pant , Adesh Kumar , Chaman Verma , Zoltán Illés
{"title":"Comparative exploration on EEG signal filtering using window control methods","authors":"Aruna Pant ,&nbsp;Adesh Kumar ,&nbsp;Chaman Verma ,&nbsp;Zoltán Illés","doi":"10.1016/j.rico.2024.100485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Electroencephalography (EEG) is used to monitor brain activity. The brain signals consist of different frequency band signals delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma waves. The signals are affected by external noise which reduces the quality of the EEG signal due to which it becomes difficult to do further processing of EEG signals like feature extraction or extraction of meaningful features from EEG signal. Therefore, it becomes important to filter the noise from the EEG signal before feature extraction or classification of the EEG signal. The research article presents an overview of different types of windowing filter techniques like Rectangular, Bartlett, Hamming, Hanning, and Kaiser windows applied for finite impulse response (FIR) behavior which is used for EEG signal processing for different brain waves processed in different frequency bands. The comparative analysis is carried out in terms of the response time of brain frequency bands for different windowing filter techniques using the MATLAB 2023 signal processing simulation tool. The novelty of the work lies in estimating minimum latency and appropriate filter selection for various typical EEG waves, since the EEG signals are pre-supposed in the hardware chip design, noise elimination is the first step in high-performance computing applications. The Bartlett window band stop has an optimal response time of 12.666 s for delta waves, a highpass filter with a response time of 16.187 s for theta waves, a bandpass with a response time of 13.122 s for alpha waves, a highpass filter with a response time of 17.866 s for beta waves, and a highpass filter with a response time of 13.797 s for gamma waves. The Barlett window FIR filter is well-suited for EEG applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34733,"journal":{"name":"Results in Control and Optimization","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100485"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Control and Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666720724001152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) is used to monitor brain activity. The brain signals consist of different frequency band signals delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma waves. The signals are affected by external noise which reduces the quality of the EEG signal due to which it becomes difficult to do further processing of EEG signals like feature extraction or extraction of meaningful features from EEG signal. Therefore, it becomes important to filter the noise from the EEG signal before feature extraction or classification of the EEG signal. The research article presents an overview of different types of windowing filter techniques like Rectangular, Bartlett, Hamming, Hanning, and Kaiser windows applied for finite impulse response (FIR) behavior which is used for EEG signal processing for different brain waves processed in different frequency bands. The comparative analysis is carried out in terms of the response time of brain frequency bands for different windowing filter techniques using the MATLAB 2023 signal processing simulation tool. The novelty of the work lies in estimating minimum latency and appropriate filter selection for various typical EEG waves, since the EEG signals are pre-supposed in the hardware chip design, noise elimination is the first step in high-performance computing applications. The Bartlett window band stop has an optimal response time of 12.666 s for delta waves, a highpass filter with a response time of 16.187 s for theta waves, a bandpass with a response time of 13.122 s for alpha waves, a highpass filter with a response time of 17.866 s for beta waves, and a highpass filter with a response time of 13.797 s for gamma waves. The Barlett window FIR filter is well-suited for EEG applications.
使用窗口控制方法进行脑电信号滤波的比较探索
脑电图(EEG)用于监测大脑活动。脑电信号由不同频段的信号δ波、θ波、α波、β波和γ波组成。这些信号会受到外部噪声的影响,从而降低脑电信号的质量,因此很难对脑电信号进行进一步处理,如特征提取或从脑电信号中提取有意义的特征。因此,在对脑电信号进行特征提取或分类之前,过滤脑电信号中的噪声变得非常重要。研究文章概述了不同类型的开窗滤波技术,如矩形窗、巴特利窗、汉明窗、汉宁窗和凯撒窗等,这些技术适用于有限脉冲响应(FIR)行为,用于在不同频段处理不同脑电波的脑电信号处理。使用 MATLAB 2023 信号处理仿真工具对不同窗滤波器技术的大脑频段响应时间进行了比较分析。这项工作的新颖之处在于估算各种典型脑电图波的最小延迟和适当的滤波器选择,因为脑电图信号在硬件芯片设计中是预先假定的,噪声消除是高性能计算应用的第一步。巴特利特窗带阻波器对三角波的最佳响应时间为 12.666 秒,高通滤波器对三角波的响应时间为 16.187 秒,带通滤波器对阿尔法波的响应时间为 13.122 秒,高通滤波器对贝塔波的响应时间为 17.866 秒,高通滤波器对伽马波的响应时间为 13.797 秒。巴利特窗 FIR 滤波器非常适合脑电图应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Results in Control and Optimization
Results in Control and Optimization Mathematics-Control and Optimization
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
91 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信