Mobility of radiological technologists within the Asia Pacific: a comparative study between Japan and Australia

Abstract

Background

Facilitating international mobility among radiological technologists (RTs) has the potential to enhance clinical practice of individual practitioners, their host countries and their country of origin when they return home. The key to maximizing the benefits and managing drawbacks of such mobility lies in international cooperation and information exchange. This study investigated the licensing/registration systems for RTs to explore the possibility of promoting transnational movement for qualified RTs to practice within the Asia Pacific region.

Methods

Ten countries/regions in the Asia Pacific region were selected based on two primary types of licensing/registration systems: single and multiple registration. Invitations were extended to presidents of professional societies or board members from national registration bodies. Participants completed an initial questionnaire, followed by semi-structured interviews online. Data was analysed using thematic analysis. This presentation focuses on Japan and Australia, comparing the similarities and differences of a single and multiple registration respectively.

Results

In Japan, diagnostic imaging, radiation therapy, and nuclear medicine operate under a single license, while Australia requires separate registration for each of the three specialisations. In Japan, a diploma is the minimum education requirement, whereas Australia requires a bachelor's degree. Both countries offer licensing/registration pathways determined through individual assessments. Language was recognized as one of the main barriers in the mobility of RTs between the two countries.

Conclusions

The unrestricted movement of RTs between Japan and Australia is presently limited. Our ongoing analysis of the systems in the remaining countries/regions aims to inform and identify potential pathways for RTs to practice within the Asia-Pacific region. With appropriate policies and strategies in place, a well-established international movement has the potential to mitigate workforce shortages, enhance patient safety, and foster mutual development in clinical practice.