Revisiting logical image formats for future digital forensics: A comprehensive analysis on L01 and AFF4-L

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Sorin Im , Hyunah Park , Jihun Joun , Sangjin Lee , Jungheum Park
{"title":"Revisiting logical image formats for future digital forensics: A comprehensive analysis on L01 and AFF4-L","authors":"Sorin Im ,&nbsp;Hyunah Park ,&nbsp;Jihun Joun ,&nbsp;Sangjin Lee ,&nbsp;Jungheum Park","doi":"10.1016/j.fsidi.2024.301811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the capacity of storage devices continues to increase significantly and cloud environments emerge, there is a need to perform logical imaging to selectively collect specific data relevant to a case. However, there is currently insufficient research addressing the appropriateness and usability of logical image file formats, which could potentially raise issues in terms of the originality and integrity of digital evidence. This study performs a comprehensive analysis of the internal structures and metadata of existing proprietary and open-source logical image file formats, with a particular focus on the L01 and AFF4-L. <span>Furthermore</span>, this study reveals several limitations of each file format and the supporting tools through practical experiments including metadata manipulation and stress tests. More specifically, the potential for loss of originality and metadata manipulation during and after logical imaging underscores the necessity for the development and standardization of more advanced logical image file formats to systematically manage different types of digital evidence from different sources. The findings of this research also demonstrate the necessity of collective efforts from the community for the continuous improvement of logical image file formats.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48481,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666281724001355","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the capacity of storage devices continues to increase significantly and cloud environments emerge, there is a need to perform logical imaging to selectively collect specific data relevant to a case. However, there is currently insufficient research addressing the appropriateness and usability of logical image file formats, which could potentially raise issues in terms of the originality and integrity of digital evidence. This study performs a comprehensive analysis of the internal structures and metadata of existing proprietary and open-source logical image file formats, with a particular focus on the L01 and AFF4-L. Furthermore, this study reveals several limitations of each file format and the supporting tools through practical experiments including metadata manipulation and stress tests. More specifically, the potential for loss of originality and metadata manipulation during and after logical imaging underscores the necessity for the development and standardization of more advanced logical image file formats to systematically manage different types of digital evidence from different sources. The findings of this research also demonstrate the necessity of collective efforts from the community for the continuous improvement of logical image file formats.
重新审视未来数字取证的逻辑图像格式:对 L01 和 AFF4-L 的全面分析
随着存储设备容量的不断大幅增加和云环境的出现,有必要进行逻辑成像,以有选择性地收集与案件相关的特定数据。然而,目前针对逻辑图像文件格式的适当性和可用性的研究还不够充分,这可能会在数字证据的原始性和完整性方面引发问题。本研究对现有的专有和开源逻辑图像文件格式的内部结构和元数据进行了全面分析,尤其侧重于 L01 和 AFF4-L。此外,本研究还通过元数据操作和压力测试等实际实验,揭示了每种文件格式和支持工具的若干局限性。更具体地说,在逻辑成像过程中和之后可能出现的原始性丢失和元数据操作,突出表明有必要开发更先进的逻辑图像文件格式并使之标准化,以便系统地管理来自不同来源的不同类型的数字证据。这项研究的结果还表明,需要社会各界共同努力,不断改进逻辑图像文件格式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信