{"title":"Assessing the Diagnostic Reference Levels of Head CT Scan at Garoua Regional Medical Imaging Center","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) are benchmarks used in medical imaging to optimize radiation doses while maintaining diagnostic image quality. They have emerged as a critical tool in this endeavor, serving as benchmarks to ensure that radiation doses from CT scans are kept within acceptable limits without compromising diagnostic efficacy. This study focuses on establishing DRLs for head CT scans at the Garoua Regional Hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross sectional study was performed from January to December 2022. Our sample included adult patients who have Head CT examination. Some variable parameters considered are: The patient age, sex, CT indications, the DLP, the CTDIvol, the voltage, rotation time and slice thickness. The DRL for each type of indication was defined as the 75th percentile of its PDL and CTDIvol</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>621 CT scan were analyzed revealing a male predominance (52.5%) and diverse indications, with strokes and traumas accounting for 27.2%. The mean age of patients was 42 ± 7 years (18 - 99 years), 37.8% were between 18 to 29 years old. The Dose distributions, specifically CTDIvol and DLP, are detailed for different protocols including strokes, non-vascular cases, sinus examinations, and angiography: 692±243 mGy·cm, 669±152mGy·cm, 78±23mGy·cm, 320±82mGy·cm. The study highlights the prevalence of stroke and trauma protocols, emphasizing the need for tailored imaging approaches for diverse neurological conditions. Comparative analyses with international practices in Uganda and Ireland reveal variations in radiation dose metrics across locations and devices.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings underscore the importance of optimizing radiation doses while maintaining diagnostic efficacy. The study not only contributes to regional DRLs but also provides a foundation for enhancing patient safety, refining imaging practices, and promoting dose optimization strategies in head CT scans.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865424002376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) are benchmarks used in medical imaging to optimize radiation doses while maintaining diagnostic image quality. They have emerged as a critical tool in this endeavor, serving as benchmarks to ensure that radiation doses from CT scans are kept within acceptable limits without compromising diagnostic efficacy. This study focuses on establishing DRLs for head CT scans at the Garoua Regional Hospital.
Methods
A cross sectional study was performed from January to December 2022. Our sample included adult patients who have Head CT examination. Some variable parameters considered are: The patient age, sex, CT indications, the DLP, the CTDIvol, the voltage, rotation time and slice thickness. The DRL for each type of indication was defined as the 75th percentile of its PDL and CTDIvol
Results
621 CT scan were analyzed revealing a male predominance (52.5%) and diverse indications, with strokes and traumas accounting for 27.2%. The mean age of patients was 42 ± 7 years (18 - 99 years), 37.8% were between 18 to 29 years old. The Dose distributions, specifically CTDIvol and DLP, are detailed for different protocols including strokes, non-vascular cases, sinus examinations, and angiography: 692±243 mGy·cm, 669±152mGy·cm, 78±23mGy·cm, 320±82mGy·cm. The study highlights the prevalence of stroke and trauma protocols, emphasizing the need for tailored imaging approaches for diverse neurological conditions. Comparative analyses with international practices in Uganda and Ireland reveal variations in radiation dose metrics across locations and devices.
Conclusion
The findings underscore the importance of optimizing radiation doses while maintaining diagnostic efficacy. The study not only contributes to regional DRLs but also provides a foundation for enhancing patient safety, refining imaging practices, and promoting dose optimization strategies in head CT scans.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. This journal is published four times a year and is circulated to approximately 11,000 medical radiation technologists, libraries and radiology departments throughout Canada, the United States and overseas. The Journal publishes articles on recent research, new technology and techniques, professional practices, technologists viewpoints as well as relevant book reviews.