Shuning Chen , Shaopeng Xia , Xiangzhou Cai , Chunyan Zou , Jingen Chen
{"title":"Development of fuel depletion code for molten salt reactor with very deep burnup","authors":"Shuning Chen , Shaopeng Xia , Xiangzhou Cai , Chunyan Zou , Jingen Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A liquid-fueled molten salt reactor (MSR) can reach a deep burnup based on online reprocessing and continuously refueling, which requires significantly different burnup calculation methods for MSRs compared with those for the traditional reactors. To address the unique burnup features and consider the fidelity of isotopic evolution in an MSR, a fuel depletion code ThorMCB is developed based on the OpenMC coupled with a specific depletion code, MODEC. Furthermore, to lower the computational cost of acquiring the equilibrium state through the time evolution step by step for an MSR, an equilibrium burnup calculation code ThorMCB-eq based on the OpenMC and MODEC is developed, which can obtain the equilibrium burnup efficiently. A single fuel lattice of MSR and an a Molten Salt Fast Reactor (MSFR) benchmark are applied for verifying the correctness of the ThorMCB and ThorMCB-eq codes. Compared with a neutron transport calculation code KENO-VI coupled with MODEC, the maximum deviation of the dominant heavy nuclides (HNs) at equilibrium state by ThorMCB is less than 10%, and that of the total mass of fission products (FPs) is less than 3%. For the MSFR benchmark, the neutronic parameters including temperature reactivity coefficient, the mass evolution of main HNs and FPs and breeding ratio (BR) from ThorMCB agree with the references. The equilibrium behavior can be quickly obtained with ThorMCB-eq, and the relative mass deviations of most nuclides keep around 2% in comparison with the results of step-by-step burnup evolution with ThorMCB. Furthermore, the same fuel contents and micro one-group cross sections at equilibrium are obtained with two different types of start-up fuels and a constant power density and fuel reprocessing scheme. In conclusion, the verified results indicate that ThorMCB and ThorMCB-eq can both provide reliable simulation for depletion evolution and equilibrium burnup for MSR fuel cycle.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 105506"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197024004566","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A liquid-fueled molten salt reactor (MSR) can reach a deep burnup based on online reprocessing and continuously refueling, which requires significantly different burnup calculation methods for MSRs compared with those for the traditional reactors. To address the unique burnup features and consider the fidelity of isotopic evolution in an MSR, a fuel depletion code ThorMCB is developed based on the OpenMC coupled with a specific depletion code, MODEC. Furthermore, to lower the computational cost of acquiring the equilibrium state through the time evolution step by step for an MSR, an equilibrium burnup calculation code ThorMCB-eq based on the OpenMC and MODEC is developed, which can obtain the equilibrium burnup efficiently. A single fuel lattice of MSR and an a Molten Salt Fast Reactor (MSFR) benchmark are applied for verifying the correctness of the ThorMCB and ThorMCB-eq codes. Compared with a neutron transport calculation code KENO-VI coupled with MODEC, the maximum deviation of the dominant heavy nuclides (HNs) at equilibrium state by ThorMCB is less than 10%, and that of the total mass of fission products (FPs) is less than 3%. For the MSFR benchmark, the neutronic parameters including temperature reactivity coefficient, the mass evolution of main HNs and FPs and breeding ratio (BR) from ThorMCB agree with the references. The equilibrium behavior can be quickly obtained with ThorMCB-eq, and the relative mass deviations of most nuclides keep around 2% in comparison with the results of step-by-step burnup evolution with ThorMCB. Furthermore, the same fuel contents and micro one-group cross sections at equilibrium are obtained with two different types of start-up fuels and a constant power density and fuel reprocessing scheme. In conclusion, the verified results indicate that ThorMCB and ThorMCB-eq can both provide reliable simulation for depletion evolution and equilibrium burnup for MSR fuel cycle.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field.
Please note the following:
1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy.
2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc.
3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.