The Impact of Deep Learning on Determining the Necessity of Bronchoscopy in Pediatric Foreign Body Aspiration: Can Negative Bronchoscopy Rates Be Reduced?

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Nurcan Çoşkun , Meryem Yalçınkaya , Emre Demir
{"title":"The Impact of Deep Learning on Determining the Necessity of Bronchoscopy in Pediatric Foreign Body Aspiration: Can Negative Bronchoscopy Rates Be Reduced?","authors":"Nurcan Çoşkun ,&nbsp;Meryem Yalçınkaya ,&nbsp;Emre Demir","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the role of deep learning methods in diagnosing foreign body aspiration (FBA) to reduce the frequency of negative bronchoscopy and minimize potential complications.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analysed data and radiographs from 47 pediatric patients who presented to our hospital with suspected FBA between 2019 and 2023. A control group of 63 healthy children provided a total of 110 PA CXR images, which were analysed using both convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning methods and multiple logistic regression (MLR).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CNN-deep learning method correctly predicted 16 out of 17 bronchoscopy-positive images, while the MLR model correctly predicted 13. The CNN method misclassified one positive image as negative and two negative images as positive. The MLR model misclassified four positive images as negative and two negative images as positive. The sensitivity of the CNN predictor was 94.1 %, specificity was 97.8 %, accuracy was 97.3 %, and the F1 score was 0.914. The sensitivity of the MLR predictor was 76.5 %, specificity was 97.8 %, accuracy was 94.5 %, and the F1 score was 0.812.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The CNN-deep learning method demonstrated high accuracy in determining the necessity for bronchoscopy in children with suspected FBA, significantly reducing the rate of negative bronchoscopies. This reduction may contribute to fewer unnecessary bronchoscopy procedures and complications. However, considering the risk of missing a positive case, this method should be used in conjunction with clinical evaluations. To overcome the limitations of our study, future research with larger multi-center datasets is needed to validate and enhance the findings.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study</h3><div>Original article.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>III.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":"60 2","pages":"Article 162014"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022346824009540","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study aimed to evaluate the role of deep learning methods in diagnosing foreign body aspiration (FBA) to reduce the frequency of negative bronchoscopy and minimize potential complications.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed data and radiographs from 47 pediatric patients who presented to our hospital with suspected FBA between 2019 and 2023. A control group of 63 healthy children provided a total of 110 PA CXR images, which were analysed using both convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning methods and multiple logistic regression (MLR).

Results

CNN-deep learning method correctly predicted 16 out of 17 bronchoscopy-positive images, while the MLR model correctly predicted 13. The CNN method misclassified one positive image as negative and two negative images as positive. The MLR model misclassified four positive images as negative and two negative images as positive. The sensitivity of the CNN predictor was 94.1 %, specificity was 97.8 %, accuracy was 97.3 %, and the F1 score was 0.914. The sensitivity of the MLR predictor was 76.5 %, specificity was 97.8 %, accuracy was 94.5 %, and the F1 score was 0.812.

Conclusion

The CNN-deep learning method demonstrated high accuracy in determining the necessity for bronchoscopy in children with suspected FBA, significantly reducing the rate of negative bronchoscopies. This reduction may contribute to fewer unnecessary bronchoscopy procedures and complications. However, considering the risk of missing a positive case, this method should be used in conjunction with clinical evaluations. To overcome the limitations of our study, future research with larger multi-center datasets is needed to validate and enhance the findings.

Type of study

Original article.

Level of evidence

III.
深度学习对确定小儿异物吸入是否有必要进行支气管镜检查的影响:能否降低支气管镜检查阴性率?
简介:本研究旨在评估深度学习方法在诊断异物吸入(FBA)中的作用,以减少阴性支气管镜检查的频率,并将潜在并发症降至最低。方法我们回顾性分析了2019年至2023年期间因疑似FBA到我院就诊的47名儿科患者的数据和X光片。由 63 名健康儿童组成的对照组共提供了 110 张 PA CXR 图像,我们使用基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的深度学习方法和多元逻辑回归(MLR)对这些图像进行了分析。结果CNN-深度学习方法正确预测了 17 张支气管镜阳性图像中的 16 张,而 MLR 模型正确预测了 13 张。CNN 方法将一幅阳性图像误判为阴性,将两幅阴性图像误判为阳性。MLR 模型将四张阳性图像误判为阴性,将两张阴性图像误判为阳性。CNN 预测法的灵敏度为 94.1%,特异度为 97.8%,准确度为 97.3%,F1 分数为 0.914。结论 CNN 深度学习方法在确定疑似 FBA 儿童是否有必要进行支气管镜检查方面表现出很高的准确性,大大降低了支气管镜检查的阴性率。这种降低可能有助于减少不必要的支气管镜检查和并发症。然而,考虑到漏诊阳性病例的风险,该方法应与临床评估结合使用。为了克服我们研究的局限性,今后需要进行更大规模的多中心数据集研究,以验证和完善研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信